ep 32 : Usually when a villain gets hold of an evidence incriminating him, he destroys it immediately after confirming its authenticity. Obviously not in this show. Then again cops use an implanted wiretap with a LED that blinks when it's recording...
No prospects for this show to overcome its shortcomings, It made me crave to rewatch God's quiz which has a similar feeling to it but is definitely much better.
Up to now I only saw the first episode, major flaws :
-The pacing is bad.
-Transitions from one scene to another are weak.
-Visual effects for CSI electronic presentations and thinking processes are lacking.
Other than that i wish they could be more moderate with the number geniuses and typing speed.
I'm watching the guy who plays the high priest in another drama, "Stranger". He plays a powerful magnate who directs the ministry of justice behind the scenes, a man of wealth and taste, who asserts naturally his authority when talking to others. I think he demeaned himself by appearing in this crappy drama let alone taking the role of the high priest and wearing that ridiculous outfit. I suppose, money talks.
It was entertaining, a shame the 4 last episodes' plot contained so many holes, not that they weren't there any before that... overall barely 7.5 worth in my opinion.
I think a scene is missing where Yoon Shi Wan's mother is secretly gulping alcohol and taking Prozac like candy, that would be a good way to explain her weird reaction to her son arguing with Jang Do Han, and why she seems in denial regarding her husband's situation.
Kudos to Mio, you really do stick to your principles, out of curiosity, I took a peek at the lists of those who fervently argue against rating this drama after only two episodes, especially those I engaged with, turns out you didn't rate it yet but many others were padding the ratings probably hoping to make up for potential negative ones.
Just watched ep 2 and this might end up being the worst Korean drama in recent years, lol.
IMHO she is not to blame for the ratings of When a man loves, since that kind of role actually suits her, her inexpressive face went well with the frustrating personality of the character. I don't see any improvements in her acting, Deep Rooted Tree was produced before When a man loves, and her acting was the same. What makes the difference each time is not her talent, but the role given to her, and that excludes anything close to comedy.
SSK is a one-tone actress... Hate her in blade man. She's okay in Sensory couple. She's the Kristen…
No, I said we have all the right to compare her performance to that of an actual Doctor since that her role, that's not the same for someone doing the role of an imaginary being that doesn't exist in the real world.
SSK is a one-tone actress... Hate her in blade man. She's okay in Sensory couple. She's the Kristen…
Come on Pinocchio! you know that this analogy is flawed... you are talking about A god, fruit of the writer's imagination, to which standards are we supposed to measure the acting of the one taking that role?
Is that the same as a procedure taught in high school (CPR)?
boooring.
NJH is terrible at acting and his character isn't cool or funny just punchable
Yes, I can, two episodes are more than enough considering that American networks use only one episode, the pilot, as a test for whether a show might work or is to be thrown out.
Then again cops use an implanted wiretap with a LED that blinks when it's recording...
-The pacing is bad.
-Transitions from one scene to another are weak.
-Visual effects for CSI electronic presentations and thinking processes are lacking.
Other than that i wish they could be more moderate with the number geniuses and typing speed.
One 'Like' from me too for your last reply.
Is that the same as a procedure taught in high school (CPR)?