News 
.
Quiet, unhurried movie. It seems to have two halves, two sides of the same story. In the first - good now, bad later; in the second - vice versa: bad now, good later. The locations are the same, the places are the same, but the conversations and words seem to be put on a different frequency.
The first half is the complete opposite of the second. Communication there is not soulful, not honest, not sincere. And that's what makes that heaviness at the end. And in the second half, everything changes: dialogues become deeper, more honest, sincere - and this makes her feel especially soulful.
The key point is the scene at the lecture, when the director says that words do not matter. At that moment, he finally seems to understand: what matters is not how beautifully you speak, but how real you are. It seems to me that this is the main message of the film: true intimacy is born not from the right phrases, but from sincerity - even if it causes pain.
The first half is the complete opposite of the second. Communication there is not soulful, not honest, not sincere. And that's what makes that heaviness at the end. And in the second half, everything changes: dialogues become deeper, more honest, sincere - and this makes her feel especially soulful.
The key point is the scene at the lecture, when the director says that words do not matter. At that moment, he finally seems to understand: what matters is not how beautifully you speak, but how real you are. It seems to me that this is the main message of the film: true intimacy is born not from the right phrases, but from sincerity - even if it causes pain.
Was this review helpful to you?
