Re_red0

omg theres a difference between enjoying it and letting people live. point is that its a consensual relationship from all parties. you have no right to judge it. thats the whole point of it being represented. they wouldnt be in there in the first place if it werent for people like u. how does anyone care abt anything this much omg

because its in terms of how much u LIKE it. You are no critic, why are you rating it objectively. not a single drama would be a 10 then bcz none are flawless.

yeah i agree with everything u said.

he's advertised as the male lead. so idt they want u to believe he isnt coming back. like ure supposed to know that

idk seems fair to me. the punishment that you mentioned seems like it would have been delivered to an angel that made a mistake. her saving people despite being from hell doesn't really connect, her punishing people though makes more sense(also from an entertainment perspective, lets not lie punishment is much more enjoyable). as for the cleanup crew, theyre also from hell so im pretty sure this is supposed to be their job anw rather than hers

I agree, thats very true. now, they showed us a metaphorical flower thing when they mentioned murder so maybe they have a different definition of what is considered murder? Either way, I hope they deal with this part well because that is actually the only complaint i have so far, i do not rlly understand how it is murder but there seems to be symbolism behind it so hopefully, they wont leave it as a plot hole

i mean she was demoted which also gets rid of a lot of her powers. She still gets to punish people but has to put in an effort since the whole point of her punishment is that it's supposed to be difficult for her. so her being able to do everything would kind of defeat the point of her getting punished

im loving this sm. and the way she cannot punish anyone unless they commit murd3r makes this all the more interesting. Loving the two leads as well, they're both great

"terrible analysis of his character". acting like theres anything to his character is actually even crazier

but that wasnt because "she was hiding her feelings" he litr puts her down every time to hide his feelings

prove me wrong then

"his character is flawed" sure id accept that IF he had any redeeming quality which he doesnt. and yes good friends NEVER ghost their friends. last i checked, ghosting should never be forgiven in the first place. but yea sure keep acting like good friends would act the way he does. forgiving ghosting is act crazy

uhh. why is no one hating doesnt mean everyone HAS to hate him. but no one hating him is completely abnormal. if anything ure acting all toxic by saying "eww" when i said nothing but the truth. another person who only likes seung hyo bcz they find him handsome. i bet millions that u would not like him if it werent for his looks as the guy has 0 redeeming qualities. but sure call random people toxic

no. he yells at her when she litr acts as "nosy" as he does anyways. but SHE doesnt insult and yell at him in an "abusive father" way. and yes people should in fact hate on him, why is no one hating on someone who is an OBJECTIVELY bad friend. he apologized after blaming her lol. apologizing doesnt make it right. if u genuinely look at ep 3 to 6 and tell me u do not understand how hes a bad friend then i have nothing else to say either bcz thats crazy

and please do explain your point? its foreign to many? nope if ure old enough to watch this show u definitely know what an open relationship is. unless u mean children which arent the target audience since every single episode talks abt s3x. everyone knows abt the existence of both of those. ure just someone who cant help but get offended when a drama tells u "mind ur own damn business when it comes to other ppls relationships"

by insulting her?? he litr uses words such as "pathetic" and wtv and also yells at her every single episode and it doesnt matter if he said hes immature. does that justify his behavior? believe it or not, in real life he would not be considered a good friend and litr everyone would be attacking him for being a red flag. yall just like him cz u find him handsome. Plus, they dont act like that to each other. every single time shes yelling at him is in response to his behavior and it is very obvious she doesnt enjoy him insulting her and litr yelling like a person with anger issues every single episode. 1-He ghosted her despite being her friend(even if u have feelings for ur friend, u do not ghost ur friend, that makes u a bad friend and a bad person in general).2- with the exception of the last episode he never saw himself as someone in the wrong and it doesnt change the fact that he blamed her for not telling him abt the stomach cancer DESPITE HIM BEING THE ONE WHO GHOSTED HER IN THE FIRST PLACE. 3- I have the whole right to hate a character especially if theyre a horrible person . "b-but hes always on her side" sure but it always has to come in a package with him acting condescending towards her 24/7, yelling or embarassing her IN PUBLIC( ehem ehem for example when she fell and broke that one vase, i do not care if he was worried abt her)

seung hyo is genuinely my least favorite character. there hasnt been a single episode, not a single one, where he hasn't acted like a complete pos towards seok ryu. not only yelling at her 24/7 but also insulting her and constantly bringing her down. mind you, he hasn't apologized after ANY of these moments. hes litr the type of guy who would pull a little girls pigtails in kindergarten bcz he likes her. im sorry but why is no one hating

yea being show on tv isnt glorification really. last i checked im not accusing vincenzo of glorifying murd3r just bcz it appeared and was justified in some cases in the show. lets stop acting like normalization and glorification are the same thing

your second point is so stupid. yes we should in fact ignore many laws. afghanistans current laws for ex literally forbid women from showing their faces or even speaking in public spaces. the USA litr legalizes guns. france litr makes hijabs illegal in many situations. some laws should in fact be ignored so dont u dare act like a smart@ss. as for the first point, i was saying u dont get to criticize them, freedom of speech is a thing, doesnt mean u dont get to deal with the consequences of people ANSWERING what u said. u being a literal drama queen in the comments literally ASKED for replies. as for the third point, that is untrue. maybe learn history, the majority of wars that were completely unrelated to religion were actually not major wars at all, so yea if u ignore the GRAVITY of wars then we could say they were rare. Wars related to religion were ALL without exception very big wars that caused many deaths. TWO gen0cides that are happening RIGHT NOW are literally happening all because of judaism. so yea ig if u do not categorize gen0cides as wars then that really decreases the negative impact of religion bcz most of those "wars" were in fact just mass murd3rs and gen0cides so i guess thats my bad. i mean if we look at charts. in the last 78 years, 89 pakistanis were k!lled over blasphemy and thats only in pakistan. dont get me started on homosexuality. lets not use religious laws as our moral compass please.

bro there was litr a case abt it one week ago in my country. majority of muslim countries do in fact follow that law. you do not know what ure talking abt, ive litr studied those laws. and stop with the "without her consent" a child cannot consent. child marriage is in fact legal in the majority of muslim countries IF parents consent to it. so the girls age of consent would still be 18 but that doesnt stop pedophilia from being legalized. and the chuch has been villainized in the west for pedophilia for ages. yall just need to admit to ur own problems instead of deflecting litr lying abt ur own laws. stop spreading misinformation abt the laws of your own country. and i do not care if ur religion told u to do that or not im telling you that the majority of countries where pedophilia is legalized are the more conservative countries rather than the west. the lowest age of consent world wide is in nigeria. the age of consent issue is still present in europe and NA but issues relating to pedophilia legally are the most prominent in africa, south america and asia followed by europe and then NA. notice how the western countries are the last ones ive stated with the exception of south america. the age of consent issue is actually the one thats the least dangerous out of all the laws legalizing pedophilia(taking into consideration the fact that the victim is rarely believed regardless of their age) since that still means parents cannot force their child to marry an 80 year old which cannot be said about many other countries in other regions of the world.