Sanoya

This is easily a 10/10. Real cinema is back.

You said you read a newspaper about the case if you did then why are you here commenting nonsense?? There was evidence provided: medical records and photos of her bruised body. THE BENCH SAW THAT AND DEEMED THE DAMAGE DONE NOT VIOLENT ENOUGH. So what fucking nonsense are you saying? This isn’t a damn false accusations the girls downstairs was bruised and damaged taking up to two weeks for recovery. That man was her fucking friend she knew for years even probably before he was popular. They were eating and drinking before who would’ve thought that an acquaintance of years would turn into a monster overnight and suddenly rape you? This is a korea thing, a middle schooler mugged and rape a middle age woman while she was on her way from work one night it was caught on cctv her eyes were bruised shut her body was full of bruises and she had difficulty walking; the middle schooler got away with paying a fine cause they claim there was lack of evidence too and how he was just too young to understand what he was doing. I hate rape apologist and victim blaming the most. Don’t reply back to me! I MADE MY COMMENT TO SPREAD AWARENESS TO PEOPLE WHO WANTS TO LISTEN AND NOT GIVE SUPPORT AND HEART EYES TO A LITERAL RAPIST. Not for you who’s tryna find every excuse under the sun to defend him.

None of what you’re saying makes sense. A is single and lives alone. My writing came from the official court documents. If you have to be in a near death situation to prove that you were rape then what a world we live in. That’s only the Korean rule btw. She had enough proof the Korean law just doesn’t protect women.

You’re shaming the victim and furthermore you have not read the statement I left either. They hadn’t just met they were friends who’ve known eachother for a while. She went to meet up with another friend and Lee was also there.

Around 2016 it span until 2018-19 though. he went unpunished so he was still able to act unaffected.

Are you hearing yourself? read back your message ALOUD.....ANY FORM OF UNCONSENTED SEX IS RAPE!!! I don't think you understand if you want to have sex and i don't want to so you force yourself on me anyways thats rape if you want to have sex and i don't want to and you coerce me into doing something i'm clearly uncomfortable with, that's rape. I can make up several other scenarios to let you know how important consent is. IT'S NOT FORIEGN IT'S BASIC DECENCY!!.

You wanna talk about being violently intimidated and there being no evidence? She went to report the crime and you know what the police did? sent her back home to gather evidence, THEY SENT THE VICTIM BACK TO THE SCENE OF THE CRIME TO GATHER EVIDENCE INSTEAD OF GOING WITH AND HELPING HER. Nevertheless SHE PROVIDED EVIDENCE OF HER CLAIMS WHEN SHE PRESENTED PHOTOS OF HER SCARRED BODY ALONG WITH MEDICAL REPORTS ON HER NETHER REGIONS THAT WOULD TAKE TWO WHOLE WEEKS TO HEAL.

wanna know what Seoul Court did with that evidence? They decided it wasn't enough because she wasn't "HURT ENOUGH" and before i'm accused of making stuff up according to official court documents and i quote "Here, the level of violence/intimidation is important. –> It must have rendered resistance “impossible or extremely difficult.” This means: If the accuser could have reasonably resisted or ran away at any point, the court is unlikely to recognize rape." SHE WAS RAPED AND YOU LOT KEEP DEFENDING THIS DISGUSTING MAN CAUSE YOU THINK HE CAN ACT, TOTALLY DISREGARDING WHAT THE VICTIM HAD TO GO THROUGH. that doesn't make you edgy it makes you a rape apologist.

They didn't declare him not guilty of not raping her he was declared not guilty because the nature of the "crime" and how much she was hurt was declared not violeng enough. In simpler terms she was raped but Korean laws requires a certain level of violence when rape happen for it to be considered as rape. Again these aren't my words but came directly from the Seoul Court bench. Furthermore in the original verdict of Victim A false accusation defamation charge she was declared not guilty by judge Seo Jeong Hyeon But somehow she still ended up serving time of eight months HOW?

ya'll will defend the worst of the worst scumbags as long as they have a korean citizenship with a perm. disgusting

They had all the right actors and a relatively workable script that could've given us a good enough script, yet for some unknown reason they keep lengthing the show and added stupid filler episodes. there's no saving this show. long drawn out and boring. I can see everybody forgiving eachother. RUBBISH!

LEE JIN WOOK IS A SEX OFFENDER AND RAPIST, HE OPENLY ADMITTED TO HAVING UNCONSENTED SEX WITH 'A' , THE VICTIM . HE GOT AWAY WITH THIS VICIOUS ACT BECAUSE JUDGE DECIDED HIS CRIMES WERE NOT VIOLENT ENOUGH{how can an act of rape not be violent?} AND EVEN THOUGH HE GOT AWAY HE WAS NOT REMORSEFUL BUT INSTEAD CHOSE TO TAKE EVEN MORE DAMAGING ACTIONS TOWARDS THE VICTIM BU SUING HER FOR DEFAMATION EVEN THOUGH BTW HE ADMITTED FROM HIS OWN MOUTH THE ACT OF SEX WAS UNCONSENTED BETWEEN THEM.

Actor Lee Jin-wook was eating at a ramen restaurant with an acquaintance when the acquaintance called a woman, referred to as A, whom he knew. After the three finished their meal, they each returned to their homes. Lee Jin-wook then asked his acquaintance for A's phone number.

Later, at 11 p.m., Lee Jin-wook contacted A, asking if he could come over to her place. A initially refused, but Lee Jin-wook sent another message and made a call. Eventually, A allowed him to
come. When Lee Jin-wook arrived, he mentioned feeling uncomfortable due to his makeup and asked if he could shower. After showering, he came out without wearing underwear and allegedly committed sexual assault.

The victim in this case ended up being convicted of a crime due to Lee Jin-wook's counter-lawsuit and was sentenced to eight months in prison. As a result, she now faces significant disadvantages when it comes to traveling abroad or seeking employment. Due to her criminal record from the prison sentence, obtaining visa approval has become difficult, making it nearly impossible for her to immigrate or travel to other countries.

Additionally, in South Korea, many companies restrict employment to candidates who have "no disqualifications for international travel," further limiting her job prospects.

She simply invited Lee Jin-wook into her space and, out of consideration, allowed him to come over, but this led to her being labeled a 'ggotbaem"(a derogatory term used to describe a woman who seduces men to exploit them financially) In reality, she is just a victim of sexual violence.

PLEASE BRING THE RAPIST LEE JIN WOOK TO JUSTICE, THE VICTIM STILL RELIVES THE VILE ACT DONE TO HER EVERYDAY NOW SHE HAS TO SEE HIM EVERYTIME SHE TURNS HER TV ON.

There were literally bruises on various parts of her body, including her ankle, knee, shoulder, cervical vertebrae, and lower back. She resisted the court just didn't recognized her effort of escape because it was noot severe enough. In korea unless your're brutally beaten up by the perpetrator then they won't consider it as rape if there is even a sligh chance you could run away or shout for help.

There was evidence to show he raped her but they were dismissed because korea does not recognize it as rape. they're simply sayiing that telling a man no i don't want to sleep with you isn't enough to consider them as a rapist.

in accordance to his statement he went to his house to have sex with her that does not mean she had felt the same way about him. in his statement he made it appear as if he 'thought' she had the same intention of sleeping with him when she didn't or else she would have consented.

"Normally, “lack of consent” is proven by showing that: the rapist used violence/intimidation (as a means) or the victim was already incapacitated (and the rapist was able to take advantage of that). Here, the level of violence/intimidation is important. –> It must have rendered resistance “impossible or extremely difficult.” This means: If the accuser could have reasonably resisted or ran away at any point, the court is unlikely to recognize rape. Having said “no” (alone) is insufficient. The court will also consider the circumstances under which the individuals entered and left the premises" This proves he got away with what he did because of the way he commited the act of the crime as it is not recognize as rape. 1. he was her friend so she trusted him enough to give him her house code so he could freely enter in and out the house. 2. Even though there was bruises all over her body, she didn't run away according to court documents 3.Even though she expressed clear displeasure of not wanting to sleep with him her telling him no alone was not sufficient for it to be ruled as rape.

IN HIS ACTUAL STATEMENT WHEN ASKED IF SHE CONSENTED HIS ANSWERED WAS NO OR LEANED TOWARDS THAT SIDE.AT NO POINT IN THE HEARING DID HE SAY HE ASKED HER FOR CONSENT OR WAS GIVEN IT. he wasked if she gave consent several times, Hence said base on his testimony.

that's it for you, rape apologist

The full bench stated, “There is room for suspicion that the two people had consensual sex. However, A not wanting sexual relations is consistent with her testimony and there is probability that sexual relations took place against A’s will.” They continued, “Based on Lee Jin Wook’s testimony, there was no asking of consent for sexual relations nor was consent given by A. In light of this, the indictment and crime cannot be proven.” Literally from the offical court document released by dispatch and your're telling me you've never seen this? it was already established he was a rapist....

I'm not debating with you. there is no room for debate when consent was not given or asked. not only did the details of that article stated that he did not get or asked for her consent should tell you everything.

"The full bench stated, “There is room for suspicion that the two people had consensual sex. However, A not wanting sexual relations is consistent with her testimony and there is probability that sexual relations took place against A’s will.” They continued, “Based on Lee Jin Wook’s testimony, there was no asking of consent for sexual relations nor was consent given by A. In light of this, the indictment and crime cannot be proven.” The bench knew he didn't ask her consent and they knew there was a probablity that he did it against her will but they still issued a not uilty verdict. They never cared to bring that man to justice from the very begining.

People are saying she recanted her statement,she did not; she was consistent with her story to the very end.

Statememts from original court documents of lee stating he did not ask for consent neither did A gave it to him: https://www.asianjunkie.com/2017/06/16/lee-jin-wook-did-not-ask-for-or-get-consent-of-alleged-sexual-assault-victim-judge-says/

Lee Jin Wook did not receive a sentence because the judge said that not giving consent is not enough to be considered rape. Therefore the Not guilty verdict as i state before does not mean he was false accused or is in anyway innocent.

https://newsfeed.dispatch.co.kr/552579

" Its good you know (understand) what evidence were presented before making an opinion. So your point basically is saying that the evidence against him could not proof that he was guilty." evidence and proof are two different things. Evidence would be a video of me shooting a man in an alley WHILE Proof would be if there is a witness at the scene who saw me do it, my alibi if any was debunked at the time of the crime, and finally if my lawyers can't convince the judge the person in the video isn't me. The vidence was enough the judge just refused to see it as uch along with being more conce with Lee's lawyer statements.

ACCORDING TO THE JUDGE HIS CRIMES WERE NOT VIOLENT ENOUGH FOR HIM TO BE CHARGED. that's literally what the ruling stated and those were not my words.

it's no longer an accusation when the accuse openly admitted to commiting the act, he said from his very mouth that he did have sex with her without her consenting, why you keep ignoring that part?

Mind you there was evidence of her body being bruised from him forcing her, literal photo evidence taken on the same day and two days after he commited the act. I don't think you understand NOT GETTING CONSENT from the second party involved in a act such as sex that requires CONSENT means you were forced. You simply cannot defend that, you can't have sex on your own you need both parties consent and involvement with all the bruises on her body from being grabbed you dear to say she was not forced?

LINK:https://newsfeed.dispatch.co.kr/552579

I know they have such naive thinking about koreans. as if the NTN room has proven nothing about the mature of korean men and how the laws defend and protect them.

Ofcourse one day a family member of mine, friend or even myself could be falsely accused if that's what you're implying but that's not the case with Lee Jin Wook though; he wasn't falsely accused he admitted to his crimes there's a clear difference.

He literally admitted to having sex with her without her consent. HE SAID THAT FROM HIS OWN MOUTH, that was his side of the story......if you think i'm bias why don't you do your own due diligence and thoroughly research the case? I have never once spoke up for justice for an "alleged" victim without doing thorough research from both sides. I need you to understand that a 'Not Guity' verdict where the case ended up being dismissed and can't be appealed doesn't make the perpetrator innoceny ESPECIALLY WHEN HE ADMITTED TO THE CRIME HIMSELF.

LINK:https://newsfeed.dispatch.co.kr/552579

LEE OPENLY ADMITTED HE DID RAPE HER WHEN HE SAID THE SEX WAS UNCONSENTED SO HOW IS IT FALSE ACCUSATION/MISINFORMATION? have you no shame for what the victim went through? the court documents are still there the artices and statement are still there for you to read. Nothing I have said or written on here is without proof or evidence. Feeling sorry for a rapist makes you a rape apologist. I don't normally wish bad for people so sincerely hope you never become a victim of violent sex crimes and if you do I hope someone will hear and believe you instead of doing what you're doing to the victim right now