yes, the episodes on kisskh are jumbled, so watch ep 1-4, then 21-24, then proceed from ep 5. i think that's the correct order, not sure if it's been edited since I watched it though
They uploaded the re-edited version already. It was an error. And they fixed it right away.
i've only seen what was uploaded online, but that was still crazy for not just one but multiple episodes in the first third to have major editing issues. i just thought it was funny to see the very apparent greenscreen shifting and the ropes etc.
forget the blunt writing and cheesy dialogue transmission, did no one notice all the editing bloopers?! We can see the green screen, ropes, and warehouse where they're shooting the show multiple times and I've only seen 10 eps. I was shook ep 10's warehouse exposure was so funny to me.
the episodes are jumbled, but in the correct order, the tattoo shifts to FL at last episode and it seems like now she will be travelling to past over and over. There's no answer to anything though. It'd be nice to have a S2...
there is got to be season 2 to resolve all the eunuch and godfather issues
if you watched it on kisskih, i'm pretty sure the last ep is supposed to when the tattoo transfers to FL. the upload got the order wrong and the last 4-5 eps should actually be in the middle, but since the episode numbers are right on the opening I'm not sure wth is going tbh
I think kisskh put the episodes in disorder, because the last few eps don't match the plot line and have scenes that appear in the memory sequence but not before then. Also the last episodes have the nearly full tattoo on ML's hand, so i think the order was messed up in uploading it.
🤮What a bunch of absolute nonsense. You sound like some creepy man making excuses for why it is ok for grown…
Wow, you're actually commenting on a post from 2 years ago, but I'll go along with it to clarify. 1) This comment was in reply to the many commentators who were claiming that the age was sick and should be illegal, completely based on the fact that the laws in THEIR country follow a different age of majority - being 18. 18 is most common in WESTERN countries, however when I used "western view," I was talking about western ideologies, as these thoughts are mostly from western cultures, not southern or eastern. Even if you're Korean, using ideologies from the west still make them western views, because it's not from your culture that those laws and ideas came from, but were adapted from the west.
2) I was clarifying that even if you disagree with the age of the FL, no law was broken so you can't force your own country's laws to make it seem like it was or should be an illegal act.
3) You stated: "Just because a country has not changed their law YET does not mean that it is morally correct or in the best interest of the people." -->
You are implying that the consent laws in your country or your thoughts on consent have reached peak morals, when in fact like I mentioned, other countries would think you are the ones morally wrong and not in the best interest for the people as you're age of consents are less than theirs. By stating this, you are also implying that Thailand is yet to have "moral" age laws and hasn't developed "yet," unless they follow your age laws.
4) You stated: "Sensible people in countries where the age of consent is less than 18-21 still understand that a relationship between someone who is still developing and someone who is fully grown is dangerous in multiple ways." -->
Firstly, the actors were not in a relationship and that was not the argument being made either. Secondly, besides the fact that no law was broken and she's already at the age of consent, even if you were to use the "18 year old" age, she's only a year younger so it's not like it's some huge difference. Her turning 18 in a few months wouldn't have made a drastic difference on her maturity. So bringing up the fact that she's "underage" in this case doesn't make sense, especially since no intimate scenes or dialogue was created between the couple. Turning 18, wouldn't have increased her power dynamic over the ML's age. Thus, your first comment also doesn't make sense, since she wasn't taken advantage of, nor did I support that type of behaviour in my comment at all. If there had been extreme scenes or dialogues then you could extend your point about the age gap, but nothing of the sort happened.
5) If you want to talk about brain maturity development, you should also know that females develop faster than their male counterparts, so the maturity of a man few years older will not be drastic either and rather pretty close in maturity where she might possibly be more mature than him. Obviously, other factors influence the maturity, not just age, which is why I mentioned the culture and environment of the non-west countries- so stop infantizing the FL.
You can google this and learn more: "The fully formed brains of women and men are almost the same, but the rate of development is substantially different. Girls reach the halfway point of brain development at 11 years of age and the brain is fully developed at 21-22. Boys reach the halfway point at 15 and the brain does not finish developing until 30"
Further, since she's at the age of consent in TH, it's safe to assume that she most likely accepted the script herself and knew what she was doing - unless it's proven that she was forced into this without her consent; and even then it has nothing to do with her age, but rather her consent of autonomy.
Also, you stating what you think is best for women in different cultures and economic countries based on the beliefs of YOUR education and YOUR country's laws is a great example of the dangers of unequal power dynamics, since you want to bring it up. People like you who think they have achieved an intelligence higher than another person based on their education or own research is laughable. You're already biased towards your learned ideas and use it to judge another with a condescending tone. BTW, the "research" you found, tell me did it not originate from western ideologies and viewpoints? Not only that, but all you did in your comment was rant about how your thoughts are right and anyone who strays from those values should be ashamed and persecuted. Ask your question to yourself, "Do you not understand anything about the dangers of an unequal power dynamic??"
I replied for educational purposes and any further replies from your view will not be responded to, so you can have the last word and calm your ego down.
pretty sure this was posted only b/c of the hate Lily got on the last article she posted on Lu Si's interview where Lily made it seem that Lu Si had "nothing to learn from Duanwu" lol
1) This comment was in reply to the many commentators who were claiming that the age was sick and should be illegal, completely based on the fact that the laws in THEIR country follow a different age of majority - being 18. 18 is most common in WESTERN countries, however when I used "western view," I was talking about western ideologies, as these thoughts are mostly from western cultures, not southern or eastern. Even if you're Korean, using ideologies from the west still make them western views, because it's not from your culture that those laws and ideas came from, but were adapted from the west.
2) I was clarifying that even if you disagree with the age of the FL, no law was broken so you can't force your own country's laws to make it seem like it was or should be an illegal act.
3) You stated: "Just because a country has not changed their law YET does not mean that it is morally correct or in the best interest of the people." -->
You are implying that the consent laws in your country or your thoughts on consent have reached peak morals, when in fact like I mentioned, other countries would think you are the ones morally wrong and not in the best interest for the people as you're age of consents are less than theirs. By stating this, you are also implying that Thailand is yet to have "moral" age laws and hasn't developed "yet," unless they follow your age laws.
4) You stated: "Sensible people in countries where the age of consent is less than 18-21 still understand that a relationship between someone who is still developing and someone who is fully grown is dangerous in multiple ways." -->
Firstly, the actors were not in a relationship and that was not the argument being made either.
Secondly, besides the fact that no law was broken and she's already at the age of consent, even if you were to use the "18 year old" age, she's only a year younger so it's not like it's some huge difference. Her turning 18 in a few months wouldn't have made a drastic difference on her maturity. So bringing up the fact that she's "underage" in this case doesn't make sense, especially since no intimate scenes or dialogue was created between the couple. Turning 18, wouldn't have increased her power dynamic over the ML's age. Thus, your first comment also doesn't make sense, since she wasn't taken advantage of, nor did I support that type of behaviour in my comment at all. If there had been extreme scenes or dialogues then you could extend your point about the age gap, but nothing of the sort happened.
5) If you want to talk about brain maturity development, you should also know that females develop faster than their male counterparts, so the maturity of a man few years older will not be drastic either and rather pretty close in maturity where she might possibly be more mature than him. Obviously, other factors influence the maturity, not just age, which is why I mentioned the culture and environment of the non-west countries- so stop infantizing the FL.
You can google this and learn more: "The fully formed brains of women and men are almost the same, but the rate of development is substantially different. Girls reach the halfway point of brain development at 11 years of age and the brain is fully developed at 21-22. Boys reach the halfway point at 15 and the brain does not finish developing until 30"
Further, since she's at the age of consent in TH, it's safe to assume that she most likely accepted the script herself and knew what she was doing - unless it's proven that she was forced into this without her consent; and even then it has nothing to do with her age, but rather her consent of autonomy.
Also, you stating what you think is best for women in different cultures and economic countries based on the beliefs of YOUR education and YOUR country's laws is a great example of the dangers of unequal power dynamics, since you want to bring it up. People like you who think they have achieved an intelligence higher than another person based on their education or own research is laughable. You're already biased towards your learned ideas and use it to judge another with a condescending tone. BTW, the "research" you found, tell me did it not originate from western ideologies and viewpoints? Not only that, but all you did in your comment was rant about how your thoughts are right and anyone who strays from those values should be ashamed and persecuted.
Ask your question to yourself, "Do you not understand anything about the dangers of an unequal power dynamic??"
I replied for educational purposes and any further replies from your view will not be responded to, so you can have the last word and calm your ego down.