I totally loved the episode, but I did find it unbelievable that Porsche was that drunk after a few glasses of…
Maybe Porsche still doesn’t get the importance and seriousness of his role, and in the next episode, he will have to confront reality, based on the preview.
He’s not flamboyant because he’s gay... Clearly his brothers and other characters in the series are gay/bi…
To me it’s not though ^^” and don’t misspell my name please… you can dislike the series, I just thought that your comment was misleading and wanted to clarify.
He’s not flamboyant because he’s gay... Clearly his brothers and other characters in the series are gay/bi…
I’ve seen many extra and theatrical straight characters. You still think that what they were portraying was the stereotype of a gay man, when it wasn’t. No one in the series perceives his behavior as being the result of his sexuality. With “irrelevant” I was referring to the fact that the personality of the character is not linked to their sexuality. You misunderstood me.
You mix a lot of stuff together, I call logical fallacy. The trans women argument is a separate one.
He’s not flamboyant because he’s gay... Clearly his brothers and other characters in the series are gay/bi…
I’ve seen many extra and theatrical straight characters. You still think that what they were portraying was the stereotype of a gay man, when it wasn’t. No one in the series perceives his behavior as being the result of his sexuality. With “irrelevant” I was referring to the fact that the personality of the character is not linked to their sexuality. You misunderstood me.
You mix a lot of stuff together, I call logical fallacy. The trans women argument is a separate one.
Whilst, again, I do have some reservations about the decisions in the writing (such as Porsche drinking to a stupor…
I also like the fact that Kinn seems to be intrigued by Porsche as a person, first of all. Kinn looks like he’s interested in discovering more about him. He seems curious. At the same time I can sense their physical attraction, which is still relevant. I like how multi-layered the characters seem to be.
I haven't watched episode 2 yet since I'm waiting for the series to finish airing, but if you are talking about…
Tankhun is the oldest brother, and he’s like that because he’s spoiled and clearly thinks he can do anything he wants without consequences and everyone around him must go along with his crazy ideas, it’s not because of his sexuality.
He’s not flamboyant because he’s gay... Clearly his brothers and other characters in the series are gay/bi…
Yes, we couldn’t disagree more. I guess everyone enjoys different things. It’s like we watched two different shows, so we probably look for different things in a series, and that’s fine. I didn’t find anything so unrealistic to take me out of the story.
I totally loved the episode, but I did find it unbelievable that Porsche was that drunk after a few glasses of…
I think you replied to me, because I got the notification. It’s fine though! I agree with you ^^ my goal is to enjoy this series as much as possible, so I’ll gladly overlook insignificant details
I totally loved the episode, but I did find it unbelievable that Porsche was that drunk after a few glasses of…
Don’t take it so seriously! ^^” That detail didn’t have any influence at all on my enjoyment of the episode. The glasses were almost empty and Porsche was used to drinking a lot of alcohol at the bar he worked in, so it is unbelievable to me. But I really don’t care, I loved the scene when he kicked Kinn by mistake XD
I'm curious: Do the majority of commenters here feel that episode 2 was funny?I feel badly for the actor playing…
He’s not flamboyant because he’s gay... Clearly his brothers and other characters in the series are gay/bi too and they’re not like that. He’s really good at playing such a comedic character. He’s very likable to me.
With “irrelevant” I was referring to the fact that the personality of the character is not linked to their sexuality. You misunderstood me.
You mix a lot of stuff together, I call logical fallacy. The trans women argument is a separate one.
With “irrelevant” I was referring to the fact that the personality of the character is not linked to their sexuality. You misunderstood me.
You mix a lot of stuff together, I call logical fallacy. The trans women argument is a separate one.
He’s really good at playing such a comedic character. He’s very likable to me.