Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: Sep 22, 2024
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: timbuktu
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: June 17, 2018
Replying to Spukhafte Fernwirkungen Oct 1, 2022
Title Good Job
Idk what your idea of "way too old" is but seeing as how she's only 32, she's still got quite a while to play…
Yeah. She has more than a decade for a lot of good roles. I hope she takes up lot of interesting projects.
On Good Job Sep 30, 2022
Title Good Job
Lead actress has a face suited for historical dramas. She should try some, before getting way too old.
On Good Job Sep 30, 2022
Title Good Job
It is somewhat fun because sidekicks(secretary, lawyer cum hacker, bread girl) have better comedic timing than main leads. Story is threadbare and writers forgot about telescopic zoom abilities of actress after pilot episode.
Romance is cringe - but not boring. Plot is definitely boring(due to lack of it).
On Her Private Life Sep 30, 2022
Main leads were ok, but supporting cast was bad. Premise was threadbare and mostly kept forgotten to accommodate for cliche romance. On the whole - tiring to sit through. Such dramas should be 2 hour movies only.
On Love in Contract Sep 30, 2022
Trash drama. Zero script. Non-existent romance. Park Min-young should marry and retire. What was the last good drama? Healer, I guess.
Replying to Lothlorien Apr 22, 2021
Title Rattan
Are you sure you want it spoiled? He's the ML. They show the child died but not really. Now you know why romance…
Sorry, I misunderstood in beginning. Its pretty convoluted - some tree/vine relation. I'm still not clear which Chinese myth this refers to.
Replying to Lothlorien Apr 22, 2021
Title Rattan
Are you sure you want it spoiled? He's the ML. They show the child died but not really. Now you know why romance…
Pretty convoluted!
Replying to Lesleynn Apr 9, 2021
Title Rattan Spoiler
Can someone spoil it for me what happens to Si Teng child I’m on eps 7 . Thanks
Are you sure you want it spoiled? He's the ML. They show the child died but not really. Now you know why romance is so light.
On Rattan Apr 9, 2021
Title Rattan
Very beautifully made drama. Romance is understandably light since plant and human romance won't make sense anyways. Even at the end, it is more a kind of liking for each other. In some sense the story is more like Chinese dramas from 2005 era when the story was built in many layers. You have to look at the story from point of view of Rattan(Si Teng) trying to find her identity.
Replying to Bethany Feb 5, 2021
Review True Beauty
The whole premise of this drama is being a cringe cheesy drama. If you watch this drama knowing that you don't…
Yeah Park Yoo Na's cuteness can make one do foolish things. Why did I even begin watching this travesty?
Akansha Feb 4, 2021
Review True Beauty
It's a stupid drama with no justification to its title "True Beauty". Maybe they should've read Keats:

A thing of beauty is a joy forever
Its loveliness increases, it will never
Pass into nothingness;
Replying to SUNSET Jan 23, 2021
Title True Beauty
Is this the heirs remake....? Epspcialy the love triangle part... it's fully copied from that...I feel this is…
Nothing can be more overrated than Heirs. It is beyond overrated. And love triangle is basically half of all Kdramas. But yeah, love triangle is boring. Can't even call it a triangle.
Replying to Navia Jan 23, 2021
Title True Beauty
I never had expectation that Seojun will be together with Jugyeong since the beginning, and I never wish. I know…
The lead pair is selfish. They don't care for friendship, only their own puppy love.
On True Beauty Jan 22, 2021
Title True Beauty
Soojin being rejected looked sad. She's a sensible person stuck in a candy filled sappy drama. Park Yoo Na, just do your own drama already. Being stuck in a mediocre story line is worst.

I hope she breaks up the lead couple and the drama ends in everybody going their own ways, and audience smashing their screens.