"Pregnant men?" You're renaming women and calling it different or worldbuilding
Assigning characters to predetermined social roles based on werewolf mythology doesn't amount to social commentary or subversion. In some conservative cultures, women have had to adopt male disguises to access resources reserved for men. Omegas concealing their identities as betas or alphas mirrors the lived experiences of women and isn't an unprecedented or fascinating occurrence
Omegaverse isn't "queer"
One of my comments expressing an unfavorable view of omegaverse, which I labeled a "cesspool of obscenity," was taken down and subjected to censorship. Why's censorship deemed acceptable in this instance, and not in others? If deemed necessary, it'd be logically consistent and acceptable to apply censorship to an entire genre
"Pregnant men?" You're renaming women and calling it different or worldbuilding
Omegaverse's alternative "reproductive" system distances the characters from the human experience. They're not men, women, male, female, or gay. They're an undefined category of being
The genre's nothing more than a regurgitation of the harmful societal constructs that girls and women have been fighting against, with more saliva and scent-marking. It's not fun, and I don't believe it'd be a loss if it were censored or destroyed
That's my point. There's an unfair imbalance in the entertainment industry when BLs with deep storylines and character…
Blind devotion to omegaverse by its fans has incentivized authors and producers to promote it at the expense of BLs within the spheres of novels, comics, animations, and recently, dramas
The genre's shocking in theory. In practice, it's not
Societal pressure to conform to "straight" norms burdens relationships with the expectation of producing offspring. Omegaverse panders to the societal comfort zones of dominance, submission, and compulsory procreation, garnering widespread backing and interest
"As far as I know there's only...ONE omegaverse show??? So...."
We don’t need more of it, we need something better
Responding to online content in public forums is well within the bounds of legal and moral behavior. It's not…
Spamming refers to the repeated posting of irrelevant or identical content. Every comment I've made is a fresh addition to the conversation, differing from those that came before
Harassment is a targeted and persistent effort to hurt another person. Are my responses to your comments hurting you?
This page is for everyone. Voicing my disagreement with the omegaverse genre doesn't target a person, it targets a genre and puts forth an alternative perspective you're free to contemplate at your discretion. You're not forced to agree or disagree
The trailer just screams "HOLY BAD FANFICTION BATMAN". All the great Chinese BL writers with the multi chaptered…
That's my point. There's an unfair imbalance in the entertainment industry when BLs with deep storylines and character development face censorship, while omegaverse, which doesn't match that level of depth, is allowed to thrive
Omegaverse fans are undermining the hard work put into creating high-quality BLs
Can you fking stop stalking people across platforms? Seriously, no one wants your opinion shoved down their throat…
Responding to online content in public forums is well within the bounds of legal and moral behavior. It's not spamming, stalking, or harassment
Seeing as the fate of this subpar drama is sealed, there's no reason for you to be apprehensive about the comments or opinions of others. Regardless of our opposition, you'll have access to the drama
This is what the fans mean by unnecessary hate comments sometimes keep your opinion to yourself and stop Pissing…
I have no problem with gay stories or relationships. Being a gay person myself, that'd be hypocritical
I have a problem with omegaverse trying to pass off its furry-coded "straight" fetishes or obsession with non-human dominance rituals, scent marking, and heat cycles as gay storytelling
All these people who absolutely hate omegaverse are literally living in this comment section. I see the same three…
People aren’t obligated to support or stay silent about media they find problematic
"If you don't like it, just click the 'not-interested' and leave"
Based on that line of thinking, it'd make more sense for you to have ignored the negative comments, rather than writing a lengthy comment yourself in defense of something you're "not even a fan of"
Omegaverse going live-action is proof not everything that can be adapted, should be
Thank you for your respectful approach to our conversation. It's not often that I encounter a person interested in exploring the eccentricities of my thought processes. Most would've lost patience and disengaged well before this point
I'll concede that my comments might've conveyed an air of aggression. The aggressive or confrontational tone is a reflection of my strong beliefs, and I'm resolute in the position that my comments on omegaverse's creative bankruptcy or obscenity are neither an insult nor an attack on the people finding enjoyment in the genre. They're an attack on the genre itself
Online forums and comment sections bear little resemblance to bookstores. A bookstore's ambience is suited for silent introspection and immersion in the world of literature. The sharing of opinions and recommendations occurs between acquaintances or friends. Strangers don't disturb others' reading or purchasing decisions in these physical spaces
The open, expansive architecture of online spaces creates an environment conducive to conversation among everyone, irrespective of their backgrounds or prior acquaintance. They're marketplaces of ideas, where we can respond to and challenge prevailing narratives. No one's walking up to anyone. The implicit understanding within online spaces is that one's opinions will be met with either reinforcement or resistance
"I'm not implying you SHOULD be making different choices, as your choices are yours to make, but my interest was peaked" "The manner in which you've chosen to engage with others on this thread-- those who unabashedly enjoy omegaverse stories-- leads me to believe you may have this tendency"
Admittedly, I'm of the belief that the people relishing problematic content, as per my judgment, possess less-than-refined tastes or preferences. There's a thrill in the back-and-forth exchanges that result from confronting them or the content in question
I do value the opportunity to participate in respectful conversations with others. The aforementioned behavior doesn't define me
Omegaverse isn't "queer"
One of my comments expressing an unfavorable view of omegaverse, which I labeled a "cesspool of obscenity," was taken down and subjected to censorship. Why's censorship deemed acceptable in this instance, and not in others? If deemed necessary, it'd be logically consistent and acceptable to apply censorship to an entire genre
The genre's nothing more than a regurgitation of the harmful societal constructs that girls and women have been fighting against, with more saliva and scent-marking. It's not fun, and I don't believe it'd be a loss if it were censored or destroyed
The genre's shocking in theory. In practice, it's not
Societal pressure to conform to "straight" norms burdens relationships with the expectation of producing offspring. Omegaverse panders to the societal comfort zones of dominance, submission, and compulsory procreation, garnering widespread backing and interest
"As far as I know there's only...ONE omegaverse show??? So...."
We don’t need more of it, we need something better
Harassment is a targeted and persistent effort to hurt another person. Are my responses to your comments hurting you?
This page is for everyone. Voicing my disagreement with the omegaverse genre doesn't target a person, it targets a genre and puts forth an alternative perspective you're free to contemplate at your discretion. You're not forced to agree or disagree
Omegaverse fans are undermining the hard work put into creating high-quality BLs
Pregnancy is a function of the woman's body and something only women can experience. The pregnant "men" you speak of are women
Seeing as the fate of this subpar drama is sealed, there's no reason for you to be apprehensive about the comments or opinions of others. Regardless of our opposition, you'll have access to the drama
I have a problem with omegaverse trying to pass off its furry-coded "straight" fetishes or obsession with non-human dominance rituals, scent marking, and heat cycles as gay storytelling
"If you don't like it, just click the 'not-interested' and leave"
Based on that line of thinking, it'd make more sense for you to have ignored the negative comments, rather than writing a lengthy comment yourself in defense of something you're "not even a fan of"
I'll concede that my comments might've conveyed an air of aggression. The aggressive or confrontational tone is a reflection of my strong beliefs, and I'm resolute in the position that my comments on omegaverse's creative bankruptcy or obscenity are neither an insult nor an attack on the people finding enjoyment in the genre. They're an attack on the genre itself
Online forums and comment sections bear little resemblance to bookstores. A bookstore's ambience is suited for silent introspection and immersion in the world of literature. The sharing of opinions and recommendations occurs between acquaintances or friends. Strangers don't disturb others' reading or purchasing decisions in these physical spaces
The open, expansive architecture of online spaces creates an environment conducive to conversation among everyone, irrespective of their backgrounds or prior acquaintance. They're marketplaces of ideas, where we can respond to and challenge prevailing narratives. No one's walking up to anyone. The implicit understanding within online spaces is that one's opinions will be met with either reinforcement or resistance
"I'm not implying you SHOULD be making different choices, as your choices are yours to make, but my interest was peaked"
"The manner in which you've chosen to engage with others on this thread-- those who unabashedly enjoy omegaverse stories-- leads me to believe you may have this tendency"
Admittedly, I'm of the belief that the people relishing problematic content, as per my judgment, possess less-than-refined tastes or preferences. There's a thrill in the back-and-forth exchanges that result from confronting them or the content in question
I do value the opportunity to participate in respectful conversations with others. The aforementioned behavior doesn't define me