TheStarsOfTheLion

The 2nd season is not really a remake. The first 4 episodes and a half of episode 5 may be a recap of the 1st season, but from then onward, it's new content.
Watching it or not still up to you anyway.

Personally, I like second season better. The main couple in the first season may had better look, better visual, but I didn't feel the "love" in their interactions. The couple in 2nd season was better at that.
Anyway, I think MoonSooRin17 gave good suggestions.

On the contrary, I think 2Moons2 is better, much better.
The first season 2Moons was released in 2017, a two-year gap before 2Moons2, so the recap can help old viewers get close to the new cast and help new viewers catch up with what happened. It's because you watch two of them consecutively that you find the early episodes of 2Moons2 repetitive.
Visuals of the actors is all the first season 2Moons has. I love 2Moons, but it's the book 2Moons that I love (reading it after being curious about Forth-Beam couple). With 2Moons the series, I ended up skipping a lot, especially in the latter half of the series. It's tiresome to watch. The second season 2Moons2 was better at catching my attention and interest, may be it's due to them have quicker pace. The acting of the cast in 2Moons2 do seem a little off in the beginning, but it gets better later on.

Aim wasn't dump by Jin.
From what I have collected so far, Bbomb was interested in Jin so Aim, as Bbomb's cousin, asked for Jin's facebook and made acquaintance with him in order to collect Jin's information for Bbomb. Later on, Jin confessed to Aim and they became a couple for awhile, but Aim wasn't interested in Jin. She would rather pay attention to her phone than to Jin, so after some failed attempts to gain her attention, Jin opened up about ending the relationship as a test for her attitude, and she said "yes" without hesitation.
So while Jin was the one that ended the relationship, it wasn't really a relationship in the first place, only a one-sided crush of Jin. Aim wouldn't care less.

When I go to Drama => All Content, there are 4 lines appeared below: Category, Sort, Area, Fees. Click on Thailand in Area.
I did it on desktop, so if you did it on phone or app, then it may be different. I find the app slow and hard to navigate so I don't use it.

I think the boss just said that he doesn't want to deal with drug. His organization can still do other things such as bar, club, casino, underground fighting, gambling, weapon dealing, loan shark,... Maybe.

Thailand if you can, of course. And I think WeTV is originated from China so you can try that. Other countries in South East Asia may worth a try too.

Too bad. It's the same with me on Nitiman the series. I can't watch it on WeTV.
However, I afraid posting a direct link to another webside here might violate some terms of use. Better be careful.

I was able to filter for it on WeTV by clicking on Drama => All Content => Area: Thailand. Maybe you should give that a try.

It was aired officially on WeTV for free, no need to watch on dramacool.

The actor of Sun was in Mr. Merman. No wonder he looks familiar to me.
He's so handsome and hot.

Jin was rumored as a playboy. Rumors may not be true. Fact is, Jin was quite committed to his relationship with Aim.
As for other characters' stories, I doubt there would be any progress, or they will just suddenly become couples at the end.

I gave out my points, and I have repeated it, yet you never reply to them or counter them. The first 2 questions relating to the topic in my previous post, you still haven't answered.
You cannot give out your reasons but demand me to understand you, otherwise I'm "obtuse".

Look up at your very first post, to remind yourself what is the topic here.
In the last few posts, you no longer talk about or mention about the writer, Jin and Bbomb or the sex drive, the topic. All you wrote about in your posts is about me. I can see here the name-calling, the dismissing of personal value ("what does NOT exist and is NOT valid are any opinions you may have on sex and relationships"; it's a fallacy here; I have no sex so my opinion of how it feel or how to do it may not valid, but my opinion on whether two guys would have it while sleep together is still valid, same as even though I never cook I can still say whether something tastes good or bad), and now the attack on my English because it's not my first language.

An argument would go nowhere when one side refuses to use reasons but relies on fallacies and personal attacks instead. I no longer see reason from you, only a will to never accept that you're not right.
You can keep on your ad hominem and name-calling. The others will have their own judgments.

I will stop here.
Goodbye.

If you don't insist that they must have sex, then what is your reason to ridicule the writer about "young male sex drive" for not letting Jin and Bbomb have sex? If it isn't a must but a matter of choice and chances, then what is the basis of your claim that two guys sleeping near each other without having sex is bullshit? You go backward on your words there.
Re-read your own posts, and give out valid reasons instead of just naming my points "ridiculous".

And whether I have had sex or not doesn't deny the truth that me and people like me EXIST and we are VALID.
Once again, you ran away from the original argument. In the last few posts, you didn't give out any points to counter the points I gave, but resort to my personal matter instead.
I take it that you no longer have any valid point to contribute to the topic.

People CAN have sex at 16 or lower doesn't mean they MUST do it and will do it with ANYONE without regard to gender, situation, relationship or emotional states.

You call me pulling fallacies but you cannot point out which of my arguments is fallacy; while it's YOU who step away from the main argument: "have been written by a woman who has no understanding of the young male sex drive" and "guys that age are ready to go all the way all of the time, anyway, anyhow". You cannot give out anything to back up your original stand in the last two posts, but attacking my sex life instead. Either you no longer know what you're talking about, or you purposely do so, which is true fallacy.

So instead of proving your stand on "young male sex drive", you attack on my inexperience in sex life. Ad hominem. Fallacy.

You refuse to understand the difference between "averages" and "all", and that "averages" was even localized. Your statistics of CDC only prove that most American youngsters have sex at young age. Most, not all. And only in USA. Even in USA, your definition of "young male sex drive" mentioned above cannot be applied to all, yet you criticized a writer of an Asian country for being different from your life style.
You ignored the different between "likely" and "must", called out "bullshit" when a guy still being confused about his orientation took things slow in his relationship, which is still normal when both parties was sure about their orientation (please don't tell me all Americans couples skip dating, hand-holding, kissing, etc. and go straight to having sex; or are you Americans that different from us Easterners?). Your arguments are the abnormal here.

As for age of consent, it's not the main argument here, for it's only about whether your claim that most Americans have sex at young age is true. Still, you said yourself "The age of consent for sex in MOST states is 16", that means there are states with age of consent of 18. And while it's true that age of consent in my country is 16 now but it's only been since 2017, merely four years ago. As for the allegation, since you keep mentioning Google, you can search for Asia Argento and Jimmy Bennett yourself.

1. Whether I'm an common case or not, my case has proved that your claim that the writer " has no understanding of the young male sex drive" is wrong. Two guys sleeping on the same bed without having sex happened.

2. Please google yourself before you talk. Maybe age of consent in your state is 16, but in the majority of the world it's still 18, especially here in eastern countries. Even in USA, I still remember a case of Me Too movements in which an actress having sex with a 17 year-old boy must pay him to shut the case up; 17 is not age of consent there.

3. Your very original point is that two guys sleeping in the same bed without having sex is BULLSHIT. Then what did you imply? If it's merely just something more LIKELY to happen then it can NOT happened, too. Just because Jin and Bbomb case fall in this case doesn't mean it's BULLSHIT.

4. You talk as if I'm not a gay guy living in a real world. What? Am I someone stepping out of a comic? You want to quickly have fun with your date. Fine. It's your preference. However, people wanting to have a committed relationship before having sex like me exist too, and we are not in instinctive number either. Some straight couples even wait for their marriage night to have their first time. It's real world, not fantasies.

I'm a virgin by choice. And while I agree that still being a virgin at 28 is not a good thing, I also don't think it's bad either. At least I don't need to be concerned about STDs.
You said that I'm 11 years behind the norm, but I think it's you that are abnormal. The age of consent is 18 in majority of the world. Age of 17 is still considered a minor; so there are cases of law violation there unless all of them miraculously have sexual intercourse with people of the same age.

With the case of Jin and Bbomb, you mind set is the one that's not normal there. We are human, not wild animals. Just because we have sexual urge doesn't mean we must have sex with anyone. Otherwise, all cheating and raping cases are justified, since both parties are young, healthy and horny. I call bullshit.

I say "Bbomb need Jin's consent" have nothing to do with Bbomb being a top or bottom (I use "top" and "bottom" here because those terms are widely used, I personally don't believe in defined top and bottom in a gay relationship; they are merely sex positions which can be changed). It's because between Jin and Bbomb, I have no doubt Bbomb is the one willing to have sexual intercourse with Jin since he have already made peace with him being gay, acknowledged his love for Jin and set on courting him. On the other hand, Jin is still confused and need time for self-discovery before he can make the next step forward.

Please tell me about "young male sex drive". I'm a 28 guy and still a virgin here. While it's true that I got attracted or aroused by a few people, that doesn't mean I must jump on them. Some people may find it's okay to have one night stand, but some wouldn't do so. Even for people who are dating, there's still something called "stages of the relationship".
The case of Jin and Bbomb here is totally normal. Jin still haven't been sure whether he truly love Bbomb or not. And Bbomb need Jin's consent.

True. The old trailer is wayyyy much better.