TheStarsOfTheLion

If so, then it's suck. I'm really interested in this one and Enchante.
To me, Bad Buddy seems like a genetic Romeo and Julien with the main hype coming from the two lead actors and not the story or plot itself. And Not Me is about delinquent gangsters but I can't get that feeling from the intro teaser, again, another series with the hype mostly coming from the lead actors.
I agree with you that this trailer is not as good as the old trailer (which was taken down).

I have just watched the first episode (strange, it isn't marked for VIP as some people here claimed to be, and I can watch it normally). I can say that it's gold! I couldn't stop laughing while watching it because of the ridiculousness it presented. And all the handsome/cute boys there are a bonus too.

I think the doctor has the right to find out about the relation between Tian and his friend - Torfun, or do some digging on the person his best friend trying to woo and warn him if something was off. It's normal for a friend.

I still can't get pass the first episode of SOTUS, as I don't like hazing :( To me, it seems like a bullying activity.

I think "horror" and "sexual" are two different things. May be he likes to write about characters screaming their head off from being chased by a bloody ghost, but not about characters screaming erotically in bed? Especially when he is a virgin so he may still sensitive and shy about that part.

I think every episode counted. They need to be able to attract and hold viewers over each episode, not wait until episode 5 or so to do that. It's nearly half the way already. Sometimes a bad trailer can even affect the whole series from the get-go.

All reviews and comments about the quality of a series that are made here are opinions too. And I have seen quite a few of praise and even some reviews with scores of 9 and 10 already. Non objected.

You lament about me not want to understand you, but do you really want to understand me? May be you should stop put a label on other such as "dishonest" and "hypocrit" and really read what I wrote.
That ONE point you try to make is also that ONE point I answer.

I will use your very own example to make the situation more clear: If I steal from you, a.k.a take your stuffs from you without your consent, and that me the wrong one; will it also apply to you when you take back what I took from you, obviously without my consent. Does taking back your stuffs that I stole make you a wrong one also?
Back on the problem at hand in case you still refuse to read and only asking others to understand you: When someone tell me that I should and should not do something while it's not their place to do so, does pointing it out and making it clear that it's not within their right really make me a hypocrite?

You should look back at the beginning of this thread, at the context of those comments. There is a difference between the case of bubibu and dllmzca.
Due to my limitation in English, it's hard for me to express it, so I will use an example: If I use my freedom of speech to attack your freedom of speech and prevent you from using it, then whether I'm right or not? If I'm right then it means only me have the right to express my opinion, isn't it? If I'm not then it means I can't tell you what and how you can express, meaning I can't use freedom of speech on you that way despite my own freedom; does the later clause contradicts and make you a hypocrite at all? I think not (if it is then the clause "I'm right" is true).
The case of dllmzca is quite similar (this thread begins with bubibu's comment).

I saw more hypocrites among the fan than the anti-fan. For example, in comment section of a series (that I wouldn't name it here), there are those who make a fuss about the few dislikes the series get on premiere, reasoning that before watching one shouldn't know the quality of the episode to dislike it, which is reasonable; however they seem to conveniently ignore hundreds of likes the series got before the it was aired.

With the way I see it, it's you the one distorting other's words.
To my understanding, dllmzca means that everyone here are entitled to voice their opinion about the quality of the movie/series, whether they are positive or negative reviews. To accept praise and positive responses unconditionally (without reasons why it's good or which parts is good) while demand the negative responses must giving out their reasons to be "constructive", it's ridiculous and seem like a double standard (I haven't seen anyone asking those who praises, saying a series is good, wonderful, masterpiece for their reasons).
It's mean Mr./Mrs. bubibu can express their love for the series to the sky, but shouldn't prevent those who don't like it from voicing their own (in their own way).