TheVolterra13

I saw someone mentioning a theory where at the end main trio dies again and then we'll see their new reincarnations. Like a cycle of fate that cannot be broken. And this point - I'd say that could very well happen.

That's for sure. The best ending is everyone getting therapy and taking responsibility for their actions.

The difference between SH and JB is that the fist one announces his presence. The car scene is the best example. He made sure SB knew who he was and why he was following her after she met that drunk creep. You can even see her smiling because she understands that the only reason he would follow her is to make sure she would get home safe. That's it. JB on the other hand... he tracks her phone and just pops up where she is "accidentally", follows her friend's profile just to see what she's doing and even reads her private diary to find out what she like. Psycho or not - it's not okay. Even if you put a label on him - it doesn't justify that behaviour.

Oh, I'm sure JB will be portrayed as this "innocent boy who got caught up with crazy people around him". But, tbh, it doesn't matter. In the end, no matter what reasons you had, you have to answer for your behaviour. Like, SH should either be fired or even sentenced for forgings evidence. But JB... I'd put him into mental hospital. The dude is a stalker with violent tendencies. I can list tons of examples so far, but what's the point? We're watching the same drama. Our perception is what different. Like, I personally hate a trope when (usually) a girl saves a guy from himself or changes him. But someone can think the whole "love defeats all evil" thing is romantic. I'm just not one of them and I could never understand it no matter how hard I tried.

He's also her student, so all that "body contact" it highly inappropriate. As well as the fact that she's constantly meeting him outside of class, even goes to his house.
I wonder if people would be more inclined to see how wrong this is if the roles were reversed.

I do hope most people would be smarter than that. But at the same time, I wonder what the intent of this drama was. Do they really want us to believe in romanticisation of toxic behaviours or do they trust that background music and "longing" shots wouldn't fool us? I wish I knew the answer.

As a girl who spends "too much time reading novels" I would beg to different. Reading has nothing to do with being naive to the point of being reckless.

I keep coming back into the comments section just to see that some people still ship FL with JB... like, I truly don't get it. How? Why? Just... the hell?
The only person I see him with by the end of this mess is a therapist. I would also consider medical treatment in isolation from society. Just to be safe.

" if you keep meeting someone accidentally, you may think that he's your fate, but let's also not forget that there might be a chance that he's stalking at you" this fits this drama perfectly

I completely agree about Sabin's characters! Not only she's being unprofessional to the point where it's uncomfortable, but she's way to naive and reckless. She's a grown woman, a professor at university, a forensic at NFC, also has a connection to museum, yet she hangs out with her student outside of classrooms and even goes to his house at knight? Like, the hell? It's especially confusing because she's told that he's a murder suspect and there evidence against him, she's like "well, he didn't kill anyone before my eyes, so I'm not gonna believe it until I see it". Girl, don't you have any self preservation instincts?
And the whole thing with "experiment" was low key sexual assaults.

So, let get this straight. In the present timeline we have:
1) a guy with a disturbing family, dark past and connection as well as overall creepy behaviour. Plus, for some reason, he decides to hand out with his professor. A LOT.
2) an unprofessional professor, who for some reason gets involved in her student's life on top of being completely irrational and reckless. Oh, and does she even know what a concept of ethics is? You don't go around touching and kissing people without their permission. It's not an experiment, it's a sexual assault.
3) a prosecutor who's willing to fabricate evidence to make sure murderers get behind bars. And for some reason in the light of other things, that seems the most reasonable. And it shouldn't be. The hell?
What a great cast of characters we have. I love it.

I do love civil discussions.

I get where you're coming from, but I have a strong believe that toxic relationships shouldn't' be portrait as "romantic" on TV.

I do hope he get's help. That boy needed psychiatrist in both timelines, not "love".

I hope JB will also get professional help. His past self already suffered the conveniences of an untreated trauma.

I mean... you do you. But you have to understand that other people might not enjoy it. For some it might even be triggering.

I feel you. For me, the hardest part to understand so far is the writer's intentions. I can get behind the scrip being so undeveloped, especially since I think her first big project, but I have to understand what she's trying to do. Because so far I see lots of potentials, but very sloppy execution.
And I also have a problem with it being advertised as a "love triangle drama". Because if that's really what they're trying to "sell" us - I don't get it.

The writing is all over the place, that's for sure.

I mean, yeah, the prosecutor isn't your typical "goody-two-shoes" and his actions are illegal, but at least he has a decent reasons. It doesn't make it okay, only understandable. Plus, I'd take a character who's fixed on putting "bad guys" in jail over the one who's killing them because they "deserve it" any day.

I'd be seriously pissed off if that happens. But it might as well. This drama is all over the place, let's face it.