It's fine to wish for Season 2 but it wasn't an open-ended story, it was part of the plot.
They hinted it during the prison assassination incident which gave us very important clues:
1. The cure in his blood is replenished whenever he dies in a brutal way unexpectedly 2. He cannot die because the cure is replenished when he dies in a brutal way unexpectedly
That was the secret he was taunting the CEO about. Sooner or later, his blood will stop having the cure unless he is killed in a brutal way unexpectedly. All throughout the series, he was deliberately creating scenarios where someone will murder him when he least expects it. It was the only way to force the cure to replenish in his blood.
This is what he was experimenting on ever since, how to actually produce the cure outside of being killed brutally unexpectedly. He was trying to find what's triggering it. He was trying to find that biological component that's contributing to it.
It is theoretically sound. We do have biological chemicals that only shows up when we're in certain situation. This is also how natural immunity from viruses and diseases developed before humanity learned to manually create vaccines.
Unfortunately, he failed in finding the answer. So, to ensure the cure won't be gone forever, he had to orchestrate such situations to keep the cure inside him.
The second question is, why is it that if a person takes a medical exam, the cure in them is nulled. He failed to find the answer to that as well. It is very similar to quantum physics, once you observe something, it settles into one state. But before we observed it, a quanta possesses all possible states it can take. This cure, for some unknown reason, disappears when someone tries to "observe" a patient he cured.
Now going back to Season 2, this is why there won't be any. Him being revealed to be alive was not a revelation at all. We already know that since the prison assassination incident. It was only a closure for the attorney.
In fact, I believe they should've ended the scene with him being undecided if he'll throw the vial or not. Making the ML call made the ending weak. The scene wasn't needed since we already know he's alive. So it was better to leave the attorney mysterious about his decision.
MDL doesn't have the Plus+ / Multiverse version yet, so if you want to submit it.The differences are:
- Two hours long - Lots of never before scenes - Better character development - Longer scenes - 3rd alternative ending - Introduces alternate timelines / universes
Basically, since parallel universe / time travel is quantum physics, they explored the What-Ifs.
I heard there are 2 different endings and a possible 3rd?How do we watch the different endings currently available?https://worldofbuzz.com/louis-koo-reveals-back-to-the-past-has-an-extended-version-with-a-third-ending-released-if-one-condition-is-met/
Third alternate ending is in the "Plus+" version or "Multiverse" version.
As far as this Korean adaptation is concerned, I'm suspecting these two characters:1. soon-to-be 3rd husband:…
Ahh. The hand thing. In the past, her bf attacked her and injured her hand. In the present, for some reason, she repeated that incident.
Although, I just remembered, the Prosecutor probably asked her what to do. At least based on when they captured and tortured her, the Prosecutor said something like "I thought I can use her".
People focusing just on the cheating arc are crazy here, there sexual trafficking going on and all they care about…
Just ignore them. They're a waste to deal with. I gave up on them. 😅 For one, it's fiction but they're so affected. Secondly, it's being used as a plot device to make it even more interesting, but they're ignoring that fact. Third, any human being do make mistakes and it has been proven scientifically that if we don't reign in our hormones, it does lead to mistakes in certain situations. But they don't want to admit it either. They act high and mighty. I just hope they don't make the same mistake themselves one day. 🤣
As far as this Korean adaptation is concerned, I'm suspecting these two characters:
1. soon-to-be 3rd husband: The real brain behind Connect In.
a. How was it that one of the hotel Connect In is using is his company's client? b. How was it that knows how to crack the system of Connect In?
Only the devs know how to bypass all the security they put in their software. Unless they want his character to be the world's greatest and ultimate hacker—which would be high school level writing.
2. The revenge victim.
I'm suspecting she's the child of the attorney.
a. She intentionally got close to her "younger sister". b. She was partially holding back on cutting her face, because she's trying to sort out her thoughts: revenge vs she's innocent why should I use her, she's my "half sister". c. She could've killed the other attorney with her drugs but only gave a.small dose. d. She duplicated the incident her "mother" had, for what? Only reason is to remind her it is not over. e. She got too angry when the attorney said to move on. For her, it's revenge. It is deeply personal. What could have made it so? Only plausible answer is, her father is the prosecuter and she hated it, her mother is the attorney and she doesn't even remember her. f. She saw the baby clothes the attorney was keeping and she was taken by surprise. Her idea was she abandoned her, but after seeing it, maybe she had a reason. g. She made sure the laptop is safe from Connect In suspects. But she's going to use it to get information about the suspects and destroy them herself. h. She left because she realized her "mother" completely abandoned her past, which includes her.
They really played well the fact that it is brands that we're actually paying for. Be it things or food. We're paying for the brand, the name, the prestige, everything else are just bonuses or a small percentage of the price.
They also played well how local products are exported elsewhere, branded as Made in elsewhere, then imported back in the origin country. This is very true. There are many Made in the Philippines products that are later imported here with Made in US/CANADA/EU and a different branding. It is a legitimate process in the industry.
The two "Sarah's" do not look similar at all regardless of what the show was preaching, lol. That whole…
That is the entire point so the "truth" is obvious.
When Sarah Kim was telling the detective the "truth", her narration was not matching the scenes we were shown. She never told the detective she saw her husband at the event, but the scene was telling us that she did.
And the husband recognized her, which helped the viewer to recognize that she is the real Sarah Kim. But Sarah said to her husband that he got someone mixed up. That was her telling him, "you haven't seen me", because right then and there, she figured out her final curtain call.
1 
1. The cure in his blood is replenished whenever he dies in a brutal way unexpectedly
2. He cannot die because the cure is replenished when he dies in a brutal way unexpectedly
That was the secret he was taunting the CEO about. Sooner or later, his blood will stop having the cure unless he is killed in a brutal way unexpectedly. All throughout the series, he was deliberately creating scenarios where someone will murder him when he least expects it. It was the only way to force the cure to replenish in his blood.
This is what he was experimenting on ever since, how to actually produce the cure outside of being killed brutally unexpectedly. He was trying to find what's triggering it. He was trying to find that biological component that's contributing to it.
It is theoretically sound. We do have biological chemicals that only shows up when we're in certain situation. This is also how natural immunity from viruses and diseases developed before humanity learned to manually create vaccines.
Unfortunately, he failed in finding the answer. So, to ensure the cure won't be gone forever, he had to orchestrate such situations to keep the cure inside him.
The second question is, why is it that if a person takes a medical exam, the cure in them is nulled. He failed to find the answer to that as well. It is very similar to quantum physics, once you observe something, it settles into one state. But before we observed it, a quanta possesses all possible states it can take. This cure, for some unknown reason, disappears when someone tries to "observe" a patient he cured.
Now going back to Season 2, this is why there won't be any. Him being revealed to be alive was not a revelation at all. We already know that since the prison assassination incident. It was only a closure for the attorney.
In fact, I believe they should've ended the scene with him being undecided if he'll throw the vial or not. Making the ML call made the ending weak. The scene wasn't needed since we already know he's alive. So it was better to leave the attorney mysterious about his decision.
Still, it reached 3 seasons?
- Lots of never before scenes
- Better character development
- Longer scenes
- 3rd alternative ending
- Introduces alternate timelines / universes
Basically, since parallel universe / time travel is quantum physics, they explored the What-Ifs.
The differences are:
Be sure to watch this first before watching the Plus+ / Multiverse version.
It's currently in theaters.
The original had 3 Seasons.
Were there ahything they adapted from the original besides the concept?
Although, I just remembered, the Prosecutor probably asked her what to do. At least based on when they captured and tortured her, the Prosecutor said something like "I thought I can use her".
1. soon-to-be 3rd husband: The real brain behind Connect In.
a. How was it that one of the hotel Connect In is using is his company's client?
b. How was it that knows how to crack the system of Connect In?
Only the devs know how to bypass all the security they put in their software. Unless they want his character to be the world's greatest and ultimate hacker—which would be high school level writing.
2. The revenge victim.
I'm suspecting she's the child of the attorney.
a. She intentionally got close to her "younger sister".
b. She was partially holding back on cutting her face, because she's trying to sort out her thoughts: revenge vs she's innocent why should I use her, she's my "half sister".
c. She could've killed the other attorney with her drugs but only gave a.small dose.
d. She duplicated the incident her "mother" had, for what? Only reason is to remind her it is not over.
e. She got too angry when the attorney said to move on. For her, it's revenge. It is deeply personal. What could have made it so? Only plausible answer is, her father is the prosecuter and she hated it, her mother is the attorney and she doesn't even remember her.
f. She saw the baby clothes the attorney was keeping and she was taken by surprise. Her idea was she abandoned her, but after seeing it, maybe she had a reason.
g. She made sure the laptop is safe from Connect In suspects. But she's going to use it to get information about the suspects and destroy them herself.
h. She left because she realized her "mother" completely abandoned her past, which includes her.
They also played well how local products are exported elsewhere, branded as Made in elsewhere, then imported back in the origin country. This is very true. There are many Made in the Philippines products that are later imported here with Made in US/CANADA/EU and a different branding. It is a legitimate process in the industry.
When Sarah Kim was telling the detective the "truth", her narration was not matching the scenes we were shown. She never told the detective she saw her husband at the event, but the scene was telling us that she did.
And the husband recognized her, which helped the viewer to recognize that she is the real Sarah Kim. But Sarah said to her husband that he got someone mixed up. That was her telling him, "you haven't seen me", because right then and there, she figured out her final curtain call.
They already did. That's why they want her to admit it herself.
They also cannot use the "witnesses" because they either are keeping quiet, or they want things to be private, or crazy in the head.
> And why didn't the police look for her kidney surgery mark?!
They already know it. But that won't prove anything. She can simply create a new story. And they cannot force her without a warrant.