ariel alba

Also I Can't Reach You or Kimi ni wa Todokanai. I failed to tell you. This is Japanese.

I'm also watching Kiseki, dear to me, My Personal Weatherman, Love in Translation, absolute zero, Dangerous Romance, Only Friends, Venus In The Sky, My Universe, Our Story (Filipina).

Besides I Feel You Linger in the Air, what other series are you watching right now?

Thank you. I would have liked to help a friend who doesn't understand English well. It's a shame they deleted the novel so quickly from Wattpad.

Hello again. Having read the novel allows you (let me call you) to have a much broader vision of the events. Grace once again.

Hello. Thanks for your reply. I haven't had the opportunity to read the novel. Do you know where I can find it in Spanish?

How reckless Khun Yai and Jom have been to kiss, look at each other, play, flirt, dance in front of anyone. They are on notice, because they know that they have been seen together by several people, including the first's uncle. They continue to expose themselves to homophobia not in a country like Thailand where homosexuality today in the 21st century is still illegal, but in a 20th century Thailand where the few and fragile rights of members of the LGBT+ community did not even exist, which can we say? ? they enjoy today. Jom learns from his friend Ming that the rumor about his relationship with Khun Yai has already spread among the servants, however, he has not discussed anything with his lover. And Khun Yai's attitude is reckless to say the least and he has not protected Jom as he should. When what will soon explode before their faces, I don't think Jom will suffer Khun Yai's fate of being forced to marry his unknown cousin until the last episode, or being sent by his parents to Victorian England to study so that he forgets to Jom or until tempers calm down. No, other torments await him, and Khun Yai has failed to protect him.
In episode 7 the word “gay” was mentioned, however, the term gay as a concept was not used until the 60s and 70s of the last century, when the homosexual community of the American city of San Francisco adopted the term in its fights for social rights.
And it seems that some characters in the series, such as Ming, the girl he is in love with, Ming's mother and others, were the first activists for gay rights in 20th century Thailand.

How reckless Khun Yai and Jom have been to kiss, look at each other, play, flirt, dance in front of anyone. They are on notice, because they know that they have been seen together by several people, including the first's uncle. They continue to expose themselves to homophobia not in a country like Thailand where homosexuality today in the 21st century is still illegal, but in a 20th century Thailand where the few and fragile rights of members of the LGBT+ community did not even exist, which can we say? ? they enjoy today. Jom learns from his friend Ming that the rumor about his relationship with Khun Yai has already spread among the servants, however, he has not discussed anything with his lover. And Khun Yai's attitude is reckless to say the least and he has not protected Jom as he should. When what will soon explode before their faces, I don't think Jom will suffer Khun Yai's fate of being forced to marry his unknown cousin until the last episode, or being sent by his parents to Victorian England to study so that he forgets to Jom or until tempers calm down. No, other torments await him, and Khun Yai has failed to protect him.
In episode 7 the word “gay” was mentioned, however, the term gay as a concept was not used until the 60s and 70s of the last century, when the homosexual community of the American city of San Francisco adopted the term in its fights for social rights.
And it seems that some characters in the series, such as Ming, the girl he is in love with, Ming's mother and others, were the first activists for gay rights in 20th century Thailand.

What I like most about The Miracle of Teddy Bear is that it is not your average, typical BL. In other words, there is no boy knows boy here, and due to an absurd circumstance they are enemies. One of them is an athlete and the other is the classic school nerd, until one day the scholar and math genius falls while trying to grab a book in the library and lands in the arms of his archenemy and they both feel a “gut current.” go through the entire body and... No, the good thing about that series is that it does not repeat the same thing that we have seen ad nauseam. I have already seen that story 50 or 100 times. I wanted to see something new, and The Miracle... does it. The production, performances and story are phenomenal.
What I like most about The Miracle of Teddy Bear is that it constantly surprises us with a touch of reality that brings us back to reality, something difficult to see in BL-themed series. In these, their characters and stories generally have nothing to do with reality.
What I like most about The Miracle of Teddy Bear is the possibility it gives us as an audience to interrelate, interconnect stories and plots that at first seem isolated, unconnected.
In this fairy tale, Tofu is a simple and frank character, direct in his innocence and naivete. It's like a child who doesn't know the world and wants to know it. He senses that this is bigger than his poor little teddy bear head is capable of imagining, and he sets off to discover it. He does everything for love, first of all jovial, childish, to receive the hug of the boy who always hugged him in joy and sadness; and then, in order to make happy that person in whom he recognizes a bitter and sad being, this naive love is transformed to give way to a romance. He wants to bring joy and happiness to Nut.
And Nut is the most complex character. You get to know his personality, his past, his temperament, as the series progresses. You imagine you know everything about him and the next scene destroys everything you believed to make way for another human being, much richer, more complex, completely unknown, unfathomable, to be discovered.
It is a story with a lot of depth, with a quality script, well written and structured, and some great characters. The resource or technique of building the story and the characters as the scenes unfold and of offering us this complexity and richness as the images happen before our retina, is very difficult to find in a Thai BL. We discover secrets and connect the dots together with the characters of the series. Not even Nut, the “owner” of the enigmas, is capable of knowing or describing the scope and depth of all the unknowns. The mysteries little by little accumulate and in the same way they are unraveled. It also uses the little-exploited formula of telling a BL story intertwined with a family drama. The family drama is harmoniously and organically integrated with the BL theme.

Hello. I see a lot of people upset that Tofu "dies". Let's remember that Tofu is a teddy bear, an inanimate being. There are two essential, key details to understand the story. Both occur in the final episode, minutes from closing. Nut writes on the computer about Tofu's story. I had already written about Thatarn and now I fulfilled the promise of writing the story of the teddy bear who becomes a person. And suddenly Tofu appears before him. Let us remember that at this time Tofu had already “died”. It is the evening of any day. They hug and tell each other again that they were happy with each other... And in the next scene we see Nut, wearing the same clothes from the previous scene, waking up with the bear in her arms. Nut woke up from a dream in which a teddy bear came to life and came to make him happy, making him reconcile with his mother and Thatarn, the love of his life, with whom he had broken up because of his father's homophobia.
And the other point occurs in the same farewell: in the following scene, after Nut wakes up, he gets ready to go to work like every morning. He leaves the room, and the teddy bear comes to life as it also happens every morning when he is left alone, to tell us: “I hope Nut is happy in “real life” and doesn't need a miracle…”. This confirms what I always thought: It was all a dream of Nut's that helped him stop being a sad and bitter person and become someone happy.

Hello. I have the file or video of this movie, but in its original language, Tagalog, which I don't understand. I would like to be able to view the film with a Spanish subtitle incorporated or, failing that, to be able to have the subtitles in .srt format in Spanish, English or another language. Thanks in advance to those who can help me.

Kanghan's grandmother pressures him: If he doesn't pass the midterms, she will change his tutor. I sense that the lady understands that her grandson is happy with Lom, that she senses that Kanghan likes to spend time with Lom, since the change in the boy's attitude and behavior is noticeable, in addition to his happiness at being close to him. I am not categorically saying that the grandmother understands that her grandson is in love, since it is still too early to speak in these terms and the boys are now beginning to recognize to themselves that they are in love, despite knowing to us from the previous episode that There is a bond between the two that dates back to when they were teenagers. Kanghan then asks Lom if he were not his guardian and, therefore, did not get the monthly money he needed to pay the debt and be able to live with some comfort, what would happen to him? On the one hand, he knows what can happen to him with the gangsters if he doesn't pay. On the other hand, it's good that Kanghan cares about Lom, but I would also like him to wish that Lom remained his guardian because he wouldn't want to leave his life. This must be the main motivation for Kanghan to strengthen his interest in studies.
“This means that the wind is very important for the windmills, right?” Kanghan asks Lom by candlelight. In addition to being a very romantic scene, it has a powerful meaning because wind and mill match their names.
Poverty led Lom to prostitute herself. This is a reality from which classist, poor societies with social inequalities are not free. And what was Kanghan doing with that girl in the restaurant? I would have liked him to be there, but because I followed Lom worried that he would do something wrong, as he did, even if he had a justification.

I believe that as an audience we have to know as many personality traits of each character as we can to understand and sympathize with them or feel aversion to playing negative characters.
I start from the idea that Zo and no one is obliged to inform their partner about their past, the loves they had, their experiences, etc. This is a matter of whether or not you want to tell him. In the same way, neither Joke nor anyone is obliged to demand that their partner tell them about their past, etc. This is one thing, but it is quite another for us, as an audience, to know the past of Zo, of Joke and of all the characters. Joke (the writer, of course) has various ways of informing us about their characteristics, their distinctive traits. For example, tearing up a photo in which you kiss with your previous or only partner (be it a man or a woman). Or blocking calls from that person on your phone and making a comment like "don't insist, don't bother, you and I already broke up." Joke is not required to tell Zo, but as the public we need this information. We would already have this information from his past and thus we are characterizing him as a character. This is an obligation of the author or screenwriter. What if Joke contracted HIV from his previous partner? What if he was unfaithful to his previous partner(s) and therefore Zo can also suffer from those infidelities? And if he is promiscuous?
Every character in a work (theatrical, literary, audiovisual...) has to be characterized. The characterization is a key element so that we can understand and appreciate, as a public, as consumers, that work.
The characterization process is arduous, as both actors and directors need to work together to create complex, realistic characters that can connect with the audience and get the audience to connect with them. If not, it is most likely to end in failure, like those you complain about so much, because the lack of characterization is one of the main reasons for those disappointments and fiascoes.
The characterization of the characters has the function of transforming the actors and actresses into the characters they will play in the play, according to the script. And for this, the actors and actresses have to understand the character as faithfully as possible. Otherwise they will not achieve credible characters. If they do not achieve believable characters, the public does not like the character and, therefore, does not like the story that is told. The reader or viewer of the work has to make a portrait, a drawing, an image, an idea about the personality of the protagonist and other characters in his mind.
These characters are not real. The scriptwriter is in charge of creating and developing characters in a story. Character characterization is one of the most important parts of a fictional story. To the extent that each character is better elaborated, with the greatest amount of nuances and psychological complexities, so will be their level of emotional connection with the public.
herefore, a good characterization of characters can only be achieved with a good script. And this has to define different aspects, such as the character's personality, his psychological traits, his physical traits (both visible and audible), his past, his dreams, his aspirations, his hobbies, his fears, his failures, his frustrations, his ways of expressing themselves, their aspirations, etc. Joke and all other characters express themselves through voice and/or actions. The action of the characters modifies the story.

From the first scenes of the series we are aware that Joke is gay, in love with Zo and determined to win him over. I have no doubt that many, if not all, of us thought that Zo was straight. Everything seemed to indicate that Joke had given Zo his homosexual awakening. Everything seemed to indicate that Joke's love had led Zo towards self-discovery or, at best, to confirmation in the case of being a closet gay. How wrong we were. In episode 7 Zo, who had never previously indicated that he was anything other than straight, shocks us unpleasantly by revealing that he had a crush on his best friend some time ago and his suffering at his rejection. Is he bisexual then? Why pretend to Nita, if she's gay? Is confused? Was she ashamed to admit her homosexuality early before her suitor? Why wait so long to reveal this information to the man he is in love with and is supposed to be the love of his life? Does anyone think that it is not important that, as an audience, they reveal their sexual orientation to us as part of the characterization? Does anyone think it's not important for Zo to point out her homosexuality to Joke? If it's not important, why reveal it then? Why reveal it just when the series has nearly moved to its conclusion? Just to lengthen the series with this "dramatic twist" and allow for one more episode in which Zo would "by chance" find herself, hours after revealing it, with her former best friend, after having lost contact with him for years? Have you had any family, social or other pressure that forced you to hide your homosexuality? Why did he play with Joke by throwing signs that he was only interested in Nita, that is, girls, and not boys? Why these constant errors or faults in the characterization of the characters?

Oh I forgot to tell you Hidden Plan, Wedding Plan, Jun & Jun and Be mine superstar, Love Class II, Minatos Launtromat Season 2, Kiseki: Dear To Me. We agreed. I also see them now, while they are broadcast. Lovely writer I finished watching it about two or three months ago. Oxigen, Call It What You Want I I and II have also recently finished. Thanks for the suggestion. I will keep her in mind.

Has Joke ever had a sexual relationship before? I do not think. I do not remember having reported having had any relationship previously. Nita wasn't even a girlfriend. They confuse me, because in episode 8 he is going to have sex with Zo for the first time, and Zo tells him "I never...", and Joke smiles. Instead of telling him “I never have either…”, he tells him to trust him, that he will treat him well… How nice he would have confessed to him in those moments that he too was a virgin.
The fact that as a public we do not know whether or not Joke has previously had a romantic relationship that has even been sexual, only demonstrates the poor characterization of the characters, the terrible writing of the series. An entire episode was dedicated to catching a stalker and, as Joke's reward for "discovering" and catching him, Zo would give himself up to him. The episode and the entire series could have been more forceful with better elaborated dialogue and writing.

What other series do you watch right now? I have several, like Dangerous Romance, I Feel You Linger In The Air, Love in Translation, My Personal Weatherman, among others. Still defining which ones I will see until the end.

Thanks for your comments (allow me to call you). I also hope to see Charn's kindness and human side. I do not doubt the love for Tinn achieved it. And Tan is another, along with Tee, who deserves a happy ending.

If we consider the concept of revenge, it consists primarily of reprimanding a person or group in response to a perceived wrongdoing. Although many aspects of revenge resemble the concept of justice, revenge in general pursues an injurious rather than harmonious objective.
That is why the desire for revenge consists in forcing whoever has done something bad to suffer the same pain as the one who committed the evil first, or to make sure that this person or group will not commit said evil again.
If Charn has gotten his revenge, why hasn't he gotten over his mother's death? Why, in 10 years, if he decided to return to the place where the events occurred, is he only doing so because of the current circumstances?

He defeated the "capitalists" and the mayor of the town? Where do they tell us this?