I sincerely, with every fiber of my being hope this flops.I'd Rather watch addicted the original and stay with…
I was against Stay With Me before but I prefer that over this remake 100%. Sure, SWM isn't a BL per se but it's 100% better than what this will turn out as.
The news is that it's going to be worse than part 1, and even worse than part 2. They've already ruined part 1…
That's your opinion, which I respect, but telling others that it'll be worse before it even comes out is down right silly. Give it a watch before the judgment when or if it comes out.
That's why you should watch the first part again before watching the second one. I'm sure you have, but just a fresh reminder as to how the first part ended; to make things seem less confusing.
i think it could have been fine if they dropped the detectives/agents side story. They added nothing at all to…
I wholeheartedly agree with this comment. It made me mad because she wasn't there to stop it from happening. But alas, since she did get her ass blasted away from the house by a fucking missile rocket, I'll let that part slide.
People say this was boring lmao I found part 1 even slower nd it lacked action also nd part 2 fulfilled it. This…
I've said this on another person's comment and I'm repeating it here as to why I prefer the first part. I prefer the first one to the second, truthfully, because it adds to the factor of how all of this happened in the first place. How they were made and all that.
Why does everyone criticize this film so much, for me it turned out to be better than the first part, the action,…
I prefer the first one to the second, truthfully, because it adds to the factor of how all of this happened in the first place. How they were made and all that.
It is indeed concerning knowing the nature of the novel and how the production for this adaption said that they…
That's indeed true, however, I would've still wanted to watch this if it weren't for the whole situation with the sixteen year old and twenty-seven year old pairing. That's so damn weird and disturbing.
The problem for me is that there are actual children going to be in this adaption of the novel. Sure, the characters…
Ah, I completely misunderstood you, then. Thank you for clearing it up. I just looked at DFF's comment section and I have to say that I'm disappointed in people. It's fine if the age difference between two main leads are in their 20s or above, but anywhere below? Get me out of there.
wow the comments below about masculine actors got me like 🤮btw one actor being in love sick and now addicted…
The problem for me is that there are actual children going to be in this adaption of the novel. Sure, the characters in the novels were underage, but to represent them as actual children via Thai BLs? Why not cast them as young looking actors instead? I'm going to have to pass on that one, chief. And yes, I consider 16 year olds as children considering my age. I don't give a damn if there's a legal age of consent in Thailand for 16 year olds, but no. This ain't it, bruh.
I'm concerned about how there are two 16 year olds in this version... I'm very concerned since it's about THE Addicted Heroin. Please tell me why there are children in this adaption(I'm older than them both, thus they're children to me; also, anyone under the age of 18, imo, should be considered children). Someone? Anybody?
1 
1 
1 
2 
I prefer the first one to the second, truthfully, because it adds to the factor of how all of this happened in the first place. How they were made and all that.
I just looked at DFF's comment section and I have to say that I'm disappointed in people. It's fine if the age difference between two main leads are in their 20s or above, but anywhere below? Get me out of there.
And yes, I consider 16 year olds as children considering my age. I don't give a damn if there's a legal age of consent in Thailand for 16 year olds, but no. This ain't it, bruh.