Anyway, Observations from ep 5 1. Prison guard and professor are on one side. Guard shows that he hates prof, but he does everything for the prof. When he was explaining how advanced tagging is and can be tied to smartwatch, that basically allowed killer to plan to take the wristwatch off FL's hand
2. Prof knows that he killed the wrong guy and he also knows who is the real culprit. And, he knows he got played by the assemblywoman. It could be that prof did not kill the psycho guy but difficult.
3. Schoolboy is definitely a hidden hacker genius and related to the driver family
4. FL's ear twitch has a history --- question is what?
5. Professor's well wishers are supporting the killer.. so killer is indeed a fan or the actual killer mocking prof.. and basically enjoying his serial killing? Who will have access to so many news and criminal details - a hacker.. or someone very close to police and assemblywoman
6. The police guy whom FL called at night is again a professor fan.. the way he explained which all cameras are there etc etc
7. Theory- Prof knows that assemblyman's youngest son is the culprit but there is no evidence; he has slowly and steadly built his team of other victims/ related folks... and the murders played two roles.. killing ones who deserve and using it as leverage to come out of the jail. Prison guard is involved.
8. But killer will still act on its own and will start doing things that prof has not planned for
( one is on tv, another executes, .. so safe to say this is not a 1 or 2 people job.. but an entire team is behind killing vote)
I also agree, it was presented a lot better in the novel. I dont understand why they did not adopt it in the same…
the way the show is showing it, twist would be "i have no expectations but love you, adore you and want you to be happy".. because right everything is like bad, dangerous vibe (lol and it turns out it is just that dad thinks his son is stupid.. that is sad but definitely not dangerous)
why not.. she would have promised bare minimum of legal support to own up to the crime.. to the driver, so that…
the only thing is that he is too young to pull off such feats.. it would need money, access to information etc.. unless everyone who is dying is linked to the teacher and JH has bugged the teacher
he has inherited his senses from his mom , like when he heard the conversation between kisoo and the class president…
The argument makes perfect sense. It is your inability to think beyond spoon fed content. There is no OFCOURSE discussion here!.. atleast grasp the tone of the discussion
Do you have a habit of throwing fits when you are forced to use your brains... because let me guess the brain is weak to begin with..
he has inherited his senses from his mom , like when he heard the conversation between kisoo and the class president…
I am genuinely curious as to why you can't articulate a relevant and logical evidence... you are overseeing the obvious things.. have you not smelled before what someone else is cooking in their house..
Explain better if you are so sure of your inferences...
Another user commented and very logical. Your takeaway should be that you are syaing what you are saying but just not backing it up with the right evidence.
he has inherited his senses from his mom , like when he heard the conversation between kisoo and the class president…
I am genuinely curious as to why you can't articulate a relevant and logical evidence... you are overseeing the obvious things.. have you not smelled before what someone else is cooking in their house..
Explain better if you are so sure of your inferences...
Another user commented and very logical. Your takeaway should be that you are syaing what you are saying but just not backing it up with the right evidence.
he has inherited his senses from his mom , like when he heard the conversation between kisoo and the class president…
i mean smell in the same house :D ... person cooking in another building is also detectable in normal life.. but let's hope he inherited somehting from his mom
He mentioned the "weak son" of the assemblywoman also..
and remember he has been doing something in the prison.. which jailor knows but we don't.. he ain't doingin just accounting in there
Anyway,
Observations from ep 5
1. Prison guard and professor are on one side. Guard shows that he hates prof, but he does everything for the prof. When he was explaining how advanced tagging is and can be tied to smartwatch, that basically allowed killer to plan to take the wristwatch off FL's hand
2. Prof knows that he killed the wrong guy and he also knows who is the real culprit. And, he knows he got played by the assemblywoman. It could be that prof did not kill the psycho guy but difficult.
3. Schoolboy is definitely a hidden hacker genius and related to the driver family
4. FL's ear twitch has a history --- question is what?
5. Professor's well wishers are supporting the killer.. so killer is indeed a fan or the actual killer mocking prof.. and basically enjoying his serial killing? Who will have access to so many news and criminal details - a hacker.. or someone very close to police and assemblywoman
6. The police guy whom FL called at night is again a professor fan.. the way he explained which all cameras are there etc etc
7. Theory- Prof knows that assemblyman's youngest son is the culprit but there is no evidence; he has slowly and steadly built his team of other victims/ related folks... and the murders played two roles.. killing ones who deserve and using it as leverage to come out of the jail. Prison guard is involved.
8. But killer will still act on its own and will start doing things that prof has not planned for
( one is on tv, another executes, .. so safe to say this is not a 1 or 2 people job.. but an entire team is behind killing vote)
but good.. appreciate additional points
*******************
On previous exchanges - you were rude first, so you got the same tone in response
could have just saved time by not throwing your nonsense all this while
Do you have a habit of throwing fits when you are forced to use your brains... because let me guess the brain is weak to begin with..
Keep your nonsense to yourself
Explain better if you are so sure of your inferences...
Another user commented and very logical. Your takeaway should be that you are syaing what you are saying but just not backing it up with the right evidence.
Explain better if you are so sure of your inferences...
Another user commented and very logical. Your takeaway should be that you are syaing what you are saying but just not backing it up with the right evidence.