what timeloop..r u saying his 5th ribulation they always go back 30K years? but once they die, they have to come…
but that's where it is illogical
Because, to go back in time, he would need that compass everytime. He gets it from JL. Now, if he lost his memory and got stuck in the past then the compass is with him.. and never goes back to JL.. so a timeloop is not possible because in next loop, how will ML go back in time again without the compass that he has but doesn't rememebr
ya.. he should otherwise he would not have remembered his mission in the first place - getting the devil power to save CH.. and now that she is here. but he knows the condition to gaining power is to not fall in love and not have a lover.. so he is going to ignore her :P
not really, her clothing is very very functional, and different.. i think it shows her personality well.. the matureness at her age and her being different
lol.. while qilian saved her primordial spirit but prince already has some of her primordial spirit in form of that jade flower.. so yeah.. she wasn't going to die anyway
so, chu kong has actually been repeating this lifetime for the nth time because whenever he and xiangyun went…
what timeloop..
r u saying his 5th ribulation they always go back 30K years? but once they die, they have to come back and life continues onto 6th tribulation.. so timeloop doesn't make sense
i know drama tried to hint at it.. but i can't see how it logically makese sense
that was long because they were showing ML and FL falling in love for the 1st time
now that they had shown falling in love, they could not repeat falling in love so many times and hence smaller arcs every other time
If you notice, it has more been about
1. Pig-tiger -> becoming aware of each other, being tied, and her being a dumb but nice loyal subject 2. Fall in love (ML does) 3. Fall in love (mutual acknowledgement) 4. grow in love, understand that when time comes to sacrifice they will have to 5. Truth exposed 6. Make out while finding solution to take down evil (but making out requires less prying eyes hence this setup) 7. Back in heave, take down evil and complete marriage
does he not have his memories? she definitely does.. and i would think he does too.. but now he has to hide because to gain power he can't be in love or show he has a lover
Because, to go back in time, he would need that compass everytime. He gets it from JL. Now, if he lost his memory and got stuck in the past then the compass is with him.. and never goes back to JL.. so a timeloop is not possible because in next loop, how will ML go back in time again without the compass that he has but doesn't rememebr
that dress is not uncommon
he saw CK's body holding onto a piece of cloth which he knows is CH's.. so he knew that CK won't hurt CH.. but this king is suspicious..
i think he wasn't 100% blaming only CK
so yeah.. she wasn't going to die anyway
r u saying his 5th ribulation they always go back 30K years? but once they die, they have to come back and life continues onto 6th tribulation.. so timeloop doesn't make sense
i know drama tried to hint at it.. but i can't see how it logically makese sense
now that they had shown falling in love, they could not repeat falling in love so many times and hence smaller arcs every other time
If you notice, it has more been about
1. Pig-tiger -> becoming aware of each other, being tied, and her being a dumb but nice loyal subject
2. Fall in love (ML does)
3. Fall in love (mutual acknowledgement)
4. grow in love, understand that when time comes to sacrifice they will have to
5. Truth exposed
6. Make out while finding solution to take down evil (but making out requires less prying eyes hence this setup)
7. Back in heave, take down evil and complete marriage
he asks CK to fix his primoridal as that is the ruse he must keep up of a caring brother.. but he is always scheming something every time
but then whatever rocks your boat.. you get your high by bashing SML for no rhyme or reason.. so how can there be a rational conversation
So, don't give semantics lesson when you know your usage of the term was to highlight negatives.
*************
By semantics, then ML and FL are schemers too. Thereby calling SML schemer is a moot point. Infact almost every character is.