Maybe you’re new in the comments, but you can watch the drama to decide on your own or scroll down the comments.…
Thank you for your suggestion. I haven't made up my mind if I want to watch the drama yet, but I would not be inclined to watch a drama where there is just hinting and innuendos and homoerotic subtext and no romance at all. Not even an explicit acknowledgement and confession of romance, because that in my mind is the text-book definition of Queerbaiting.
My understanding of Queerbaiting is that - If there is a lot of hinting, suggestions, homoerotic subtext, clever twists, slow burning tension, innuendos, poetry, bone-throwing that is going on that is suggestive of a same-sex romance, but there is absolutely no depiction of same-sex romance, not even a romantic confession or explicit acknowledgement of a same-sex romance and relationship between the men, then I have always felt that technically that classifies as Queerbaiting and not exactly BL. There has to be some explicit expression and acknowledgement of romance and not just innuendos and hinting and subtext.
that classification doesn't have enough nuance. queerbaiting is just doing it for pure clout, it is queerbaiting…
My understanding of Queerbaiting is that - If there is a lot of hinting, suggestions, homoerotic subtext, clever twists, slow burning tension, innuendos, poetry, bone-throwing that is going on that is suggestive of a same-sex romance, but there is absolutely no depiction of same-sex romance, not even a romantic confession or explicit acknowledgement of a same-sex romance and relationship between the men, then I have always felt that technically that classifies as Queerbaiting and not exactly BL. There has to be some explicit expression and acknowledgement of romance and not just innuendos and hinting and subtext.
I understand why they may have done it - Chinese censorship and all. I get that. But it doesn't change the fact that it is afterall Queerbaiting.
It's not queerbaiting because the purpose of queerbaiting is to appeal to an audience without ever giving them…
Thank you. Yes, please watch the drama and come back with a better answer if you could.
My understanding of Queerbaiting is that - If there is a lot of hinting, suggestions, homoerotic subtext, clever twists, slow burning tension, innuendos, poetry, bone-throwing that is going on that is suggestive of a same-sex romance, but there is absolutely no depiction of same-sex romance, not even a romantic confession or explicit acknowledgement of a same-sex romance and relationship between the men, then I have always felt that technically that classifies as Queerbaiting and not exactly BL. There has to be some explicit expression and acknowledgement of romance and not just innuendos and hinting and subtext.
May I ask a question purely out of curiosity? My understanding of "BL" is that it is a genre that depicts homoerotic relationships between male characters and that this genre was predominantly created by women and also for the consumption by women.
So, what exactly is it about two men getting it on that women find so attractive and appealing?
So I might be saying something controversial here, but that is okay, it is just my opinion and not meant to offend anyone. I actually don't consider the drama to be BL. I understand that the original novel is BL, but in my opinion the drama is not. The drama is actually the text-book definition of Queerbaiting to be honest where creators hint at, but then do not actually depict, same-sex romance or other LGBTQ representation. They do so to attract ("bait") a queer or straight ally audience with the suggestion of relationships or characters that appeal to them, while at the same time attempting to avoid alienating other consumers. So there is plenty of hinting, and innuendos going on (sleeve cutting, etc), suggestive poems, homoerotic subtext, clever twists, slow burning tension, bone-throwing, etc. that is going on, but absolutely zero depiction of any same sex romance. There isn't even a confession of romance. Don't get me wrong, I love this drama and I'm crazy about it, but I would not call it BL. The novel might be BL, but the drama is not. Again, just my opinion.
OMG can't stop thinking of her Flower song now and I'm turning my hands too. LOL.
My understanding of Queerbaiting is that - If there is a lot of hinting, suggestions, homoerotic subtext, clever twists, slow burning tension, innuendos, poetry, bone-throwing that is going on that is suggestive of a same-sex romance, but there is absolutely no depiction of same-sex romance, not even a romantic confession or explicit acknowledgement of a same-sex romance and relationship between the men, then I have always felt that technically that classifies as Queerbaiting and not exactly BL. There has to be some explicit expression and acknowledgement of romance and not just innuendos and hinting and subtext.
I understand why they may have done it - Chinese censorship and all. I get that. But it doesn't change the fact that it is afterall Queerbaiting.
My understanding of Queerbaiting is that - If there is a lot of hinting, suggestions, homoerotic subtext, clever twists, slow burning tension, innuendos, poetry, bone-throwing that is going on that is suggestive of a same-sex romance, but there is absolutely no depiction of same-sex romance, not even a romantic confession or explicit acknowledgement of a same-sex romance and relationship between the men, then I have always felt that technically that classifies as Queerbaiting and not exactly BL. There has to be some explicit expression and acknowledgement of romance and not just innuendos and hinting and subtext.
So, what exactly is it about two men getting it on that women find so attractive and appealing?