You don’t have to watch something you don’t like just because of your favourite actors, you are actually doing…
Please refrain from insulting others. I can see that in your world there is no room for opinions different from your own, but that does not mean you are allowed to make personal attacks against anyone. Expressing a negative opinion about a fictional production (which, in my case, amounts to “I don’t like this drama, I don’t enjoy it, I think the protagonist is poorly written”) does not entitle you to personal attacks—neither against me nor against people who try to defend freedom of speech. Please respect others.
And for your information, I wrote one negative comment about this drama; I am not spamming the topic. But thank you—you encouraged me to leave a very constructive negative review, where I will most likely focus on the fact that the drama lacks a basic element: stakes. The guy most likely traveled back in time and does whatever he wants. Okay, that’s someone’s creative vision. But what is he risking if he fails? What are the consequences? Or is there a reward if he succeeds? There is nothing. So why should I care about him, or about his mission—which is… what exactly? The drama does not establish that. You can say his goal is to fix the past, but will his actions have real consequences, will they change the future, or is it just—well, exactly what?
Did I say even a single insulting word toward you or another user? No. So why, instead of addressing my arguments like others who like this drama, are you attacking me and those who defend freedom of speech?
There is no single production that will appeal to everyone. Tough luck that we have different tastes. But that really does not justify attacking me or demanding that I delete a comment that does not violate MDL’s rules. This platform exists to exchange opinions about dramas. It is not a site exclusively for fans of a given production.
Thank you, and I would like to inform you that I do not intend to engage in further discussions with you. However, I will comment on this drama whenever I feel like it, because this is a right granted to me—and to all of us—by this platform.
I started watching this today as I was up to date with To my beloved thief, spring fever and idol i Didn't have…
We don't know Jun-U's story. It may turn out that he comes from a really poor background and that this job is actually a matter of life and death for him. He has repeatedly said that they should also care about themselves. He may know desperation better than their clients. I think every character in this drama is written with real depth, so Jun-U also has his own sad story.
I really don’t like this drama. For now I’m watching it because Ji Sung is one of my favorite actors and I like two of the supporting characters, but the drama just doesn’t click with me. I understand that a judge who went back in time might feel untouchable, and maybe he truly still believes he’s in purgatory and has to fix his mistakes in order to move on, but to me he’s completely psychologically unrealistic. Maybe that’s the point—maybe the whole charm is that he’s an egocentric lunatic who pisses all over the system—but it just doesn’t work for me. On top of that, the court and the law are treated as if the script were written by a high schooler who’s seen three low-quality legal dramas and thought they could write courtroom trials. For some people this might be the drama’s biggest appeal; for me, it isn’t.
I mean, I love this drama, but what's O Gyu Jang's motive for wanting Kang Da Wit's downfall? I really don't get…
Maybe it really is the way Da-wit’s mother used to say it. You come from nothing, and you’ll always be treated like dirt. A smart man outside the clique can’t rise above the snobbish legal elite. This is just a reminder of where his place is.
On top of that, his integrity won’t allow him to be a puppet, so he’ll never be useful to a major firm. He was hired as a pro bono lawyer because he was meant to keep his head down and win custody cases over dogs, not to change the law in Korea.
We're not living in the 70s or 80s. The world has changed. Now we have smartphones and the internet to communicate. Honestly, why are you so fixated on me? Do you like me or something?
You know, when you know from the beginning who is going to shoot and why – not because of trailers, descriptions and comments, but because of how it is shown in the drama – there is really no point in dragging it out over the whole episode. And what's wrong with you? Are you three years old that you insult someone who has a different opinion than yours? Didn't your nursery school teacher teach you good manners?
I finished watching it, but more out of boredom than enjoyment. I lost interest somewhere halfway through the season, and as the episodes went on, I just yawned and rolled my eyes. If I were 10 years younger and had seen 100 fewer dramas, maybe I would have been excited.
I liked it more when the story was in the prison. Introducing the Squid Game-like survival element was weird and…
Agreed. The third arc is better than the second but worse than the first. As far as I'm concerned, they went a bit overboard. The action scenes were okay.
I can't even say if I liked this drama. The first two episodes were terribly slow. Okay, they built tension, but I think they built even more frustration. It was great to see all these veteran K-drama actors, and ML was okay, even interesting. The middle was quite nice. But the ending – meh. It was a bit like this drama didn't know if it wanted to be a psychological thriller, a morality tale, or just a reflection of the American discussion on the issue of firearms transferred to foreign soil. Great cast, huge potential, but the good storylines weren't used well at the expense of discussing the state of society.
And for your information, I wrote one negative comment about this drama; I am not spamming the topic. But thank you—you encouraged me to leave a very constructive negative review, where I will most likely focus on the fact that the drama lacks a basic element: stakes. The guy most likely traveled back in time and does whatever he wants. Okay, that’s someone’s creative vision. But what is he risking if he fails? What are the consequences? Or is there a reward if he succeeds? There is nothing. So why should I care about him, or about his mission—which is… what exactly? The drama does not establish that. You can say his goal is to fix the past, but will his actions have real consequences, will they change the future, or is it just—well, exactly what?
Did I say even a single insulting word toward you or another user? No. So why, instead of addressing my arguments like others who like this drama, are you attacking me and those who defend freedom of speech?
There is no single production that will appeal to everyone. Tough luck that we have different tastes. But that really does not justify attacking me or demanding that I delete a comment that does not violate MDL’s rules. This platform exists to exchange opinions about dramas. It is not a site exclusively for fans of a given production.
Thank you, and I would like to inform you that I do not intend to engage in further discussions with you. However, I will comment on this drama whenever I feel like it, because this is a right granted to me—and to all of us—by this platform.
You either like a drama or you don’t. What does that have to do with my real life, other than the fact that I don’t like drama in my real life?
Did you mean: "It's a drama, not real life"?
On top of that, his integrity won’t allow him to be a puppet, so he’ll never be useful to a major firm. He was hired as a pro bono lawyer because he was meant to keep his head down and win custody cases over dogs, not to change the law in Korea.
And what's wrong with you? Are you three years old that you insult someone who has a different opinion than yours? Didn't your nursery school teacher teach you good manners?