Denying when there is literal proof? Wow, you are so shameless.
You made those replies to ME and even PMd me a po** link, that I wish I could've shown to everyone! This ends here. I'm gonna drag you legally now, so I'm blocking your ass so I can preserve the PM proof...
That's me, and no it's not. Kindly refrain from accusing people of something you can't prove. :)
I check one website. It says that the top review is 14% AI while highlighting some words instead of everything, so probably not. Acc. to it, the second top review is 11% AI and user Fthi_17 is 48%
Edit: I just asked CHATGPT to write a review of this show and then checked on the website and it said 64% AI when it should've said 100% AI...
I think those websites only predict by the kind of vocabulary the text has, which does not exactly prove if it's AI-generated or not in my opinion...
Personally, I don't care if something is AI or not... what matters for me is if it gives what I need.
Like what? That's what I want to know! I haven't watched many medical dramas.
And I'll tell Cora to sue you for defamation for this comment, it won't be the first time anyway.
Unmasked is VERY underrated.
You made those replies to ME and even PMd me a po** link, that I wish I could've shown to everyone!
This ends here. I'm gonna drag you legally now, so I'm blocking your ass so I can preserve the PM proof...
Acc. to it, the second top review is 11% AI and user Fthi_17 is 48%
Edit: I just asked CHATGPT to write a review of this show and then checked on the website and it said 64% AI when it should've said 100% AI...
I think those websites only predict by the kind of vocabulary the text has, which does not exactly prove if it's AI-generated or not in my opinion...
Personally, I don't care if something is AI or not... what matters for me is if it gives what I need.