kretuzerwilhelmxiii

No, Eren was intended as a psycho with anger issues and inferiority complex, at no point did the author try to make him likeable and instead he was an example of how not to behave. But just like Light Yagami in death note, Eren gathered a fair share of fans despite author intentions, lmao.

Better then titanic (impersonal opinion)!

jesus christ, this is fiction. imagine having your religious feelings offended by a drama literally called goblin

episode 6, the dude "rescues" cats from the street by locking them in tiny cages and leaving them there for whole day, only visiting once to feed them. how benevolent!

great series, but what the hell is this pet shop in episode 5 where a cat is just sitting on display in a tiny glass cage? is this how cats are treated/sold in chinese pet shops?

lmao this doesn't fit him so hard it's so funny

I'll remember that next time I watch some drama about a serial killer

he's a simp who married a woman who said she doesn't love him and she's only marrying him for his money and he was ok with that because he thought he's so great he will make her fall in love with him

and at the same time he is also a very petty man who got jealous when FL's old lover re-appeared even as they were pretty much preparing to get divorced anyway

could it be some quality issue? did you try watching it on some other medium, like a different phone or tv?

What political situation? Portraying homosexual romance on tv is not a political thing. No author is happy to see their work censored, it's basic human psychology.

You were the first one who mentioned that the author is fine with it with absolute certainty, as if you knew it for a fact, hence I asked for evidence.

Faulty logic such as "there was a chance they may censor it and author should have been aware of that so that means she is ok with it" isn't an evidence.

only because she sold it, doesn't mean she's ok. there are many instances of authors selling rights and regretting it later, example Witcher. If I get evidence like a tweet or interview of author saying it's ok, then I'll believe it.

This is a good drama, but I felt like something was lacking. Like it failed to make me very invested in the story. I liked the transhumanist message. I will watch season 2 if it's made.

yes, it would invalidate your claim that "koreans don't want it and it's just westerners complaining"

is the korean author of the novel happy with censorship? are korean lgbt people ok with it?

Her character looks constantly stressed and vulnerable. It's true she doesn't smile much, but she expresses all kinds of other emotions. It's silly to rate a good show low just because your favorite actress acted differently then what you're used to anyway.

how many episodes!?!?!

damn we can't have a week without queen of tears article

so is it about something made in korea, or a maid in korea?

I think it's one person making alts

thanks to this, people know that the drama is based on censored homosexual story. people know that there is more to character's relationship then the drama tells. that's one win. I wouldn't know for example about homosexual storyline if I haven't read the comments here.

and after I learned about it, I proceeded to tell about this drama to all my friend who watch k-dramas, so they can learn about it too and how it got censored

we all agreed that such censorship is a bad thing, especially since in korea unlike in china it's not illegal so it was a choice of producer