I don't know all the legal jargon properly, but here's my summation: it'd be circumstantial evidence since the…
But if the cops knew she was Sarah Kim, why not continue to maintain that stance, that she's Sarah Kim and then be freed to go since no concrete evidence. All of this because they were going to release news on her company and it will go down. But the hole I guess is that media would know a Sarah Kim died, and he already announced in earlier episode about the scam to media. So public would've figured it out anyways imo.
I don't know all the legal jargon properly, but here's my summation: it'd be circumstantial evidence since the…
<< If he proved she had donated the kidney and was Sarah Kim, she'd lose her brand, he'd lose his chance at knowing who she really was, his case, his job and chance at a promotion. >>
I'm confused by this part, because the scar does prove its her, how would he be losing his chance to know its her? So he would still get the conviction, no?
I'm confused by this part, because the scar does prove its her, how would he be losing his chance to know its her? So he would still get the conviction, no?