Why is it wrong to use an 18-year-old in the series?
I had already closed the discussion in my previous comment, so let me be clearer: I'm not going to engage with disingenuous arguments like that one, also considering first, I've never said I'm okay with minors being murdered in media, you just assumed it and rolled with it; and two, I've already talked about the way the public generally consumes sex scenes. The fact that you've resorted to whining at me to 'shut up' is telling in itself. Do you enjoy challenging others but not being challenged? You shouldn't have started this conversation, then. Byee
Why is it wrong to use an 18-year-old in the series?
Of course I am saying it, who else, you asked for my opinion lol. I have every right to drop something if it feels immoral and uncomfortable. And yes, it is different, first because of the way it's shot, no intimacy coordinators whatsoever, and second because of the effect it's meant to have on the public. Legal and moral are not the same thing, go push your pedophilic logic somewhere else.
Why is it wrong to use an 18-year-old in the series?
They cast a teenager and had him do super explicit scenes with an older guy, it's just not right. At 18 you should be protected a little before you reach the maturity to decide how comfortable you are with sex scenes, the agencies and troupes already have power over you as a young actor, it's harder to refuse so they shouldn't propose that kind of role to someone so young.