looks like it, the writers are probably using amnesia as a plot device to bring his older memories back.
He's probably gonna start acting at some point, maybe he's acting even now when he came to the shop and met Yeo Eun Nam, but they'll probably let us know a bit later, kind of using that as a plot twist. This is just my theory, so it might not be true.
What blows a hole in your theory is that most romance Kdramas have CEO rich guy as the ML.And these men are all…
I totally agree with you. That's the same argument I had made even before you in this comment section that Yeo Eun Nam is actually, just a really well-written character with great depth and people here are just looking at her actions without trying to understand her reasons.
I forgot, who is huh joon ho and whose father are you talking about?
If ML is his son, then I'm sure that he's unaware of that fact since he wanted Yeo Eun Nam as a niece-in-law rather than a daughter-in-law, which would've been more beneficial to him in the long run.
I forgot, who is huh joon ho and whose father are you talking about?
The chairman's secretary probably has something to do with the ML considering her reaction to the name the ML now goes by. She's probably aware of the ML's forgotten past, but to what extent and what her relationship with ML is, I've got no idea. Also, for the guess she made, I'm pretty sure that's not the case, but she can obviously theorize what she thinks could be the case, at least until it gets revealed. Who knows she might as well be right.
When was Seo Dong Ju ever a good guy? Also, Yeom Hui Cheol trying to force himself on his wife, all in the name…
Exactly, he didn't even mention the word 'force' which was the point of emphasis in my comment earlier and directly stated that I'm the one calling him pathetic because he's 'trying' to kiss his wife. What a good twist of words!
When was Seo Dong Ju ever a good guy? Also, Yeom Hui Cheol trying to force himself on his wife, all in the name…
I don't really disagree with what you've said, but rather I would just add that the decisions that she made, though not the best from a moral standpoint, were due to her affection for her biological father, which we don't know a lot about.
Also, the only reason I replied to the person above you was because they seemed to focus way too much on one thing and completely negate the other one. I don't condone her actions or anything, but rather more so, I understand her reasons. That simply means that she's a well-written character at least in my opinion.
edit: I just realized that I completely misunderstood your comment. I definitely don't agree with what you've said. You're saying the same thing the guy above was saying and I completely misunderstood your statement. Since both of you're saying the same thing, I'm not gonna reply again, since I've already said what I wanted to say regarding that. Also, I'm not deleting it or writing it again from the start because it does make somewhat of a sense to the overall context (i'm lazy).
The description does not sound very interetsing and is a bit confusing. Can someone tell me what this drama really…
It's basically a revenge drama, the protagonist works in a company that he someday wants to take over but the family of the company's chairman wants nothing more than him out of the scene, so they try to kill him, he somehow survives, hacks into a slush fund and steals 2 trillion won so they don't try to kill him again, those people try to kill him again without knowing about the hacking, think they succeeded, he somehow survives again. The main story starts from here on out, since the synopsis that is written above doesn't start until episode 3, the first 2 episodes are basically just a prologue. You'll have to watch it to understand it better.
edit: a lot happened but i tried my best to summarize it, probably butchered it.
Also, for the guess she made, I'm pretty sure that's not the case, but she can obviously theorize what she thinks could be the case, at least until it gets revealed. Who knows she might as well be right.
Also, the only reason I replied to the person above you was because they seemed to focus way too much on one thing and completely negate the other one. I don't condone her actions or anything, but rather more so, I understand her reasons. That simply means that she's a well-written character at least in my opinion.
edit: I just realized that I completely misunderstood your comment. I definitely don't agree with what you've said. You're saying the same thing the guy above was saying and I completely misunderstood your statement. Since both of you're saying the same thing, I'm not gonna reply again, since I've already said what I wanted to say regarding that. Also, I'm not deleting it or writing it again from the start because it does make somewhat of a sense to the overall context (i'm lazy).
edit: a lot happened but i tried my best to summarize it, probably butchered it.