always thought i was the only one thinking she's definitely not a chameleon actress. some just aren't suited for…
I don't think Han So Hee is a chameleon actress, but I also don't think she's at the Rock's level of acting. Rock choosing typecast roles. While Han Soo Hee, she isn't great, but she choosing different roles and various projects. And sometimes she lacks in some of them. But let's not forget people criticised Suzy's acting, IU's acting etc, and they improved, so Han So Hee also has a chance to become better.
Pretty sure people online would have made his life a living hell and canceled his career, if he had left his wife.…
People wrote a petition related to someone's relationship?? What kind of sick mind would come up with such idea. Some people really completely rude, inpolite and don't understand concept of a personal life at all. It's one case to stop supporting actor because you don't like his relatives (although I think this is ridiculous), but another one is demanding for him to break up with someone, because you, a complete stranger, don't like his girlfriend. People who did that are complete idiots.
He has more chemistry with parkjihoon than any other girls he played with in dramas
You can praise your favourite ship without comparing them to downgrade others. Yes, CHW has great chemistry with PJH, and he also had good chemistry with Shin Eun Soo in Twinkling Watermelon
As much as i want her to take her sweet time to get rest and relaxed, im hoping she will make a comeback and yes…
KJW and IU definitely have similarities in their projects, as they're often working with the same writers: FFMW with KJW and WLGYT with IU - writer Im Sang Choon, My Mister with IU and My liberation notes with KJW - writer Park Hae Young, Producers with IU and Queen of tears with KJW, and IU also was first offered to play lead role in QOT - writer Park Ji Eun, And also director Kim Won Suk worked both with KJW on Arthdal chronicles and with IU on WLGYT. Considering amount of dramas they have as main leads, 5 with Kim Ji Won as main lead and 4 with IU as main lead, it's surprises me how often they worked with the same writers. 3 dramas of KJW, and 2 dramas of IU. I didn't see such pattern with other actresses of their age (or maybe I just didn't notice). I guess in k-drama industry the way they portraying characters considered at the same level, at least by writers they worked with. And maybe them working on projects with the same writers, similar genres and similar characters, also a reason you feeling the same vibes from them. Or opposite, writers offering scripts to them because they feeling the same vibes from these actresses, the vibes they see for their characters. Anyway, it's interesting. I still didn't watch WTLGYT, but I also thought how KJW could play in that drama, because setting looks interesting, and it seems very good drama for actress to show their skills. As a huge fan of KJW acting I can't help but sometimes doing that when I see interesting dramas. I would love to see KJW playing mother role, but such roles not often offered to actresses of her age, and KJW said right now she interested in detective, action genres and wants to try "femme fatale" role. Probably this is why she choose Doctor X. She takes a long time to choose next project, and by interviews I watched with her, it seems, she considering what kind of role she wants to play next, and based on that choosing the script. I guess she wants to step from melodramas for a while. Her next project is a medical noir drama, maybe after that she would change her mind and would want to play different from "femme fatale" role.
He probably will be in Weak hero class 2. And he filmed in Netflix movie Mantis as support character (I don't…
Director, staff and actors of Weak hero posted photos with CHW not so long ago, and CHW himself posted photos from Weak hero class few times. This is why I think he can be in a drama, and they can make it a surprise. Well, this is my assumption. You can read more information about CHW and his future projects here. https://x.com/hyunwookfile
Lee Chae Min should find a new agency before it's too late! Gold Medalist is imploding due to multiple controversial…
He won't become collateral damage if people won't involve rookie actors into bosses of their agency scandal. I already answered to you under Choi Hyun Wook account, will say it again: "You're so easy to say that, as if he can terminate his contract whenever he wants without any penalties. I'm agree with you though, this scandal can affect actors of their agency. But all of them are rookie 20s actors and actresses. If people would badmouth them for bosses of their agency, when these people are morons."
You're so easy to say that, as if he can terminate his contract whenever he wants without any penalties.I'm agree…
Did you read his contract, you know exactly on which conditions he working there? "He’s a successful actor with options." - he's a successful actor for his age, but he's not A-list actor yet. If his contract including that condition, he can't change agency whenever he wants without paying penalties for that. But if you're talking about successful actors, can you name at least ONE example, when any korean successful actor left agency and break contract before it was expired? Not to say he would have to change not only his agency, but his manager, stylists, security guard, all people he worked with, and you're still saying as it's something easy to do and decide.
only one drama this 2025? please continue to spoil us with atleast 2 dramas per like in 2023 and earlier. i loved…
He probably will be in Weak hero class 2. And he filmed in Netflix movie Mantis as support character (I don't know how small or big his role there), which will air this year, probably in Q3. And there's casting news about drama The Boy in the Last Row, but it wasn't confirmed.
You're so easy to say that, as if he can terminate his contract whenever he wants without any penalties. I'm agree with you though, this scandal can affect actors of their agency. But all of them are rookie 20s actors and actresses. If people would badmouth them for bosses of their agency, when these people are morons.
I find interesting it's office romance drama about 4 adult divorced people, all of them experienced love and marriage before. There wouldn't be "first love, first kiss" situations. They all know what love is, and also what broken heart feels like.
a company with children as its audience doesn't want to cease contact with a proven pedophile, groomer, misogynist…
"What a good look for them" You praising Disney without a reason. "In 2019 Disney’s vice president, Michael Laney, was arrested on the basis of repeated sexual abuse involving a seven year old girl. Michael was 73 at the time of his arrest and had been working for Disney for decades. After his sentencing, others came forward to admit that they, too, had been abused by him. Unfortunately, there was not enough evidence to prove these claims. "
You don't know these people. Stop idolising them for every little thing and praising them for actions which don't involve moral, but money and public reputation. I think you all should learn this already.
She’s been involved in her fair share of scandals. So far it never stopped her.
I don't need to looking up, I know Han So Hee doesn't have any serious scandal except her controversy about her ex relationship. So your comment "She’s been involved in her fair share of scandals. So far it never stopped her." still doesn't have sense. You're mentioning general public, endorsements etc. Before that controversy about ex Han So Hee was one of the most popular actress in Korea, so no matter what she did or said, it didn't affect general public and endorsement. You're saying losing endorsements qualifies as scandal. All negative aspects of her career, including losing endorsements, happened after ONE scandal, your comment implied few of them. And smoking wasn't a part of issue. People find out about her smoking before Han So Hee got her first main lead role. It wasn't a problem for her career. It's not about "South Korea takes it extremely seriously", it's about how hard pathetic trolls on social media want to bully someone for anything.
Can I know the source of your claims because none of the articles or even snippets of the police reports I searched…
Anyway, for us seriously discussing it, please sent these major outlets and their articles about Lee Jung Jae you mentioning here. At least one. I sent to you the source of information I find credible. It's hard to discuss how credible sources of our information are, when I don't know your source of information, to which publishing houses and their articles you referring to as credible ones.
Can I know the source of your claims because none of the articles or even snippets of the police reports I searched…
"why has he remained quiet with so many huge publishing houses publicising wrong news about him? " - by huge publishing houses you meaning articles which writing Koreaboo as their source of information or what? Sent this huge publishing houses please.
"i am surprised that he did not counter-sue the woman for harrassment and stalking when she took action against him.. why did he stay quiet? it is fishy." - did you read my first comment, where I wrote about Kim Jae Joong? I literally wrote answer on that. "and if this x thread is true by now some news outlet would have clearly picked it up and published his side of the story - again nothing on that front." - you still stating as this thread isn't a true, when all this thread posted is information from KOREAN SOURCES! They didn't just wrote "Lee Jung Jae isn't guilty, trust me bro". I'm confused how you saying this thread isn't true, because it's implies korean articles they posted with links to them isn't real. Did you even read this thread?
You saying you're a journalist. As a journalist you should check sources of information for articles you reading. And you could read this thread and to check sources of all information posted there. Not just saying "if this were a true, some outlets would write about it". You're a journalists yourself, and you're not bothered to check this information and to write about it. You saying "if this is true why Lee Jung Jae didn't do that, why journalists didn't wrote that". If you yourself not bothered to check if this is true or not, what do you expect from other journalists? It's not like journalists didn't spread misinformation about celebrities before. You could question why these major outlets you referring to, also spreading false information about second assault case and homophobia allegations. Why they didn't check these news properly, and if they didn't check it, how credible they actually are. Not just assuming "this thread written by his fans, they can be blind by love" and call it a day.
Can I know the source of your claims because none of the articles or even snippets of the police reports I searched…
"Fans spend a lot of time digging information to support their faves" - yes, fans digging information, as any person should do before accusing someone to something. I saw so many times how international gossip sites like Panchoa and Koreaboo and twitter users spreading false information for views and likes, and how they're not checking any information they spreading. And how netizens spreading false information about celebrities as well. So I always checking everything they spreading herself. I'm not even Lee Jung Jae's fan, I just pissed off by some k-drama fans, how often they spreading misinformation and immediately believing in everything they seeing on social media. The thread I sent posted only officially published information by korean journalists and sources, they posted way more links and sources of their information than any "major outlet" you talking about. I don't have any reason to think it's less credible source of information just because it's Lee Jung Jae's fan, they provided links and sources to every word they wrote. "but i refuse to believe that all these major outlets can so carelessly write about him without any research at all." - you can believe in whatever you want, but these outlets posted A LOT of false information about him. I'm saying so confidently about it, because his first assault case not the only thing they spread about him. The other ones, as second assault case and allegations to homophobia are 100% false information, which you can easily check by reading that thread AND checking the sources this thread got information from. And what kind of major outlets you're talking about? False information about his case started to spread from Panchoa, this isn't major outlet, but well known international forum for gossips. And some of international sites didn't even translate articles about him properly, as they mistranslated pronounces, probably because they used google translate. I don't believe people who can't even translate articles properly, did serious research.
"if you search the web other than this x thread no where does it actually mention" - did you read till the end of my comment? I said to @/chillingindoors - "if you want to read articles I'm talking about, ask me, I sent it". It means I already searched other webs! And by searching other webs I meant korean articles made at the time incident happened, not international gossip sites made 25 years later which didn't even translate pronounces properly. Many international articles wrote "he dragged her out of her car" - because they can't even translate properly the things they reading. While in reality it was "he dragged her out of HIS car". The thread I sent posted a document list with all links and sources to clarify where they find this information, they didn't made up this information themselves, and you can easily check everything they wrote. You're assuming another web can have more credible source than this thread. Sent it please, I will read it.
While Han Soo Hee, she isn't great, but she choosing different roles and various projects.
And sometimes she lacks in some of them.
But let's not forget people criticised Suzy's acting, IU's acting etc, and they improved, so Han So Hee also has a chance to become better.
It's one case to stop supporting actor because you don't like his relatives (although I think this is ridiculous), but another one is demanding for him to break up with someone, because you, a complete stranger, don't like his girlfriend. People who did that are complete idiots.
FFMW with KJW and WLGYT with IU - writer Im Sang Choon,
My Mister with IU and My liberation notes with KJW - writer Park Hae Young,
Producers with IU and Queen of tears with KJW, and IU also was first offered to play lead role in QOT - writer Park Ji Eun,
And also director Kim Won Suk worked both with KJW on Arthdal chronicles and with IU on WLGYT.
Considering amount of dramas they have as main leads, 5 with Kim Ji Won as main lead and 4 with IU as main lead, it's surprises me how often they worked with the same writers. 3 dramas of KJW, and 2 dramas of IU. I didn't see such pattern with other actresses of their age (or maybe I just didn't notice).
I guess in k-drama industry the way they portraying characters considered at the same level, at least by writers they worked with. And maybe them working on projects with the same writers, similar genres and similar characters, also a reason you feeling the same vibes from them. Or opposite, writers offering scripts to them because they feeling the same vibes from these actresses, the vibes they see for their characters. Anyway, it's interesting.
I still didn't watch WTLGYT, but I also thought how KJW could play in that drama, because setting looks interesting, and it seems very good drama for actress to show their skills. As a huge fan of KJW acting I can't help but sometimes doing that when I see interesting dramas.
I would love to see KJW playing mother role, but such roles not often offered to actresses of her age, and KJW said right now she interested in detective, action genres and wants to try "femme fatale" role. Probably this is why she choose Doctor X. She takes a long time to choose next project, and by interviews I watched with her, it seems, she considering what kind of role she wants to play next, and based on that choosing the script.
I guess she wants to step from melodramas for a while. Her next project is a medical noir drama, maybe after that she would change her mind and would want to play different from "femme fatale" role.
This is why I think he can be in a drama, and they can make it a surprise.
Well, this is my assumption.
You can read more information about CHW and his future projects here.
https://x.com/hyunwookfile
I already answered to you under Choi Hyun Wook account, will say it again:
"You're so easy to say that, as if he can terminate his contract whenever he wants without any penalties.
I'm agree with you though, this scandal can affect actors of their agency.
But all of them are rookie 20s actors and actresses. If people would badmouth them for bosses of their agency, when these people are morons."
"He’s a successful actor with options." - he's a successful actor for his age, but he's not A-list actor yet. If his contract including that condition, he can't change agency whenever he wants without paying penalties for that.
But if you're talking about successful actors, can you name at least ONE example, when any korean successful actor left agency and break contract before it was expired?
Not to say he would have to change not only his agency, but his manager, stylists, security guard, all people he worked with, and you're still saying as it's something easy to do and decide.
And he filmed in Netflix movie Mantis as support character (I don't know how small or big his role there), which will air this year, probably in Q3.
And there's casting news about drama The Boy in the Last Row, but it wasn't confirmed.
I'm agree with you though, this scandal can affect actors of their agency.
But all of them are rookie 20s actors and actresses. If people would badmouth them for bosses of their agency, when these people are morons.
There wouldn't be "first love, first kiss" situations. They all know what love is, and also what broken heart feels like.
https://tv.naver.com/v/72590805?fbclid=PAY2xjawJN4bRleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABpjGViQIyGgHkRAceVOOTr-qRQP50pObhI-tnJmAH3DhDFSUdicFOOmRqHw_aem_hBuRT8YFhcwg3Fl5Xb6kPg
You praising Disney without a reason.
"In 2019 Disney’s vice president, Michael Laney, was arrested on the basis of repeated sexual abuse involving a seven year old girl. Michael was 73 at the time of his arrest and had been working for Disney for decades. After his sentencing, others came forward to admit that they, too, had been abused by him. Unfortunately, there was not enough evidence to prove these claims. "
You don't know these people. Stop idolising them for every little thing and praising them for actions which don't involve moral, but money and public reputation. I think you all should learn this already.
So your comment "She’s been involved in her fair share of scandals. So far it never stopped her." still doesn't have sense.
You're mentioning general public, endorsements etc.
Before that controversy about ex Han So Hee was one of the most popular actress in Korea, so no matter what she did or said, it didn't affect general public and endorsement. You're saying losing endorsements qualifies as scandal. All negative aspects of her career, including losing endorsements, happened after ONE scandal, your comment implied few of them.
And smoking wasn't a part of issue. People find out about her smoking before Han So Hee got her first main lead role. It wasn't a problem for her career. It's not about "South Korea takes it extremely seriously", it's about how hard pathetic trolls on social media want to bully someone for anything.
I sent to you the source of information I find credible.
It's hard to discuss how credible sources of our information are, when I don't know your source of information, to which publishing houses and their articles you referring to as credible ones.
Sent this huge publishing houses please.
"i am surprised that he did not counter-sue the woman for harrassment and stalking when she took action against him.. why did he stay quiet? it is fishy." - did you read my first comment, where I wrote about Kim Jae Joong? I literally wrote answer on that.
"and if this x thread is true by now some news outlet would have clearly picked it up and published his side of the story - again nothing on that front." - you still stating as this thread isn't a true, when all this thread posted is information from KOREAN SOURCES! They didn't just wrote "Lee Jung Jae isn't guilty, trust me bro". I'm confused how you saying this thread isn't true, because it's implies korean articles they posted with links to them isn't real. Did you even read this thread?
You saying you're a journalist. As a journalist you should check sources of information for articles you reading. And you could read this thread and to check sources of all information posted there. Not just saying "if this were a true, some outlets would write about it". You're a journalists yourself, and you're not bothered to check this information and to write about it. You saying "if this is true why Lee Jung Jae didn't do that, why journalists didn't wrote that". If you yourself not bothered to check if this is true or not, what do you expect from other journalists? It's not like journalists didn't spread misinformation about celebrities before. You could question why these major outlets you referring to, also spreading false information about second assault case and homophobia allegations. Why they didn't check these news properly, and if they didn't check it, how credible they actually are.
Not just assuming "this thread written by his fans, they can be blind by love" and call it a day.
The thread I sent posted only officially published information by korean journalists and sources, they posted way more links and sources of their information than any "major outlet" you talking about. I don't have any reason to think it's less credible source of information just because it's Lee Jung Jae's fan, they provided links and sources to every word they wrote.
"but i refuse to believe that all these major outlets can so carelessly write about him without any research at all." - you can believe in whatever you want, but these outlets posted A LOT of false information about him. I'm saying so confidently about it, because his first assault case not the only thing they spread about him. The other ones, as second assault case and allegations to homophobia are 100% false information, which you can easily check by reading that thread AND checking the sources this thread got information from.
And what kind of major outlets you're talking about? False information about his case started to spread from Panchoa, this isn't major outlet, but well known international forum for gossips. And some of international sites didn't even translate articles about him properly, as they mistranslated pronounces, probably because they used google translate. I don't believe people who can't even translate articles properly, did serious research.
"if you search the web other than this x thread no where does it actually mention" - did you read till the end of my comment? I said to @/chillingindoors - "if you want to read articles I'm talking about, ask me, I sent it". It means I already searched other webs! And by searching other webs I meant korean articles made at the time incident happened, not international gossip sites made 25 years later which didn't even translate pronounces properly. Many international articles wrote "he dragged her out of her car" - because they can't even translate properly the things they reading. While in reality it was "he dragged her out of HIS car".
The thread I sent posted a document list with all links and sources to clarify where they find this information, they didn't made up this information themselves, and you can easily check everything they wrote.
You're assuming another web can have more credible source than this thread. Sent it please, I will read it.