Setting aside the fact that you might be sexist, where did they actually shame the male lead? The male lead is…
Both of us know it's bcz he doesn't want people to know he drank Choco milk, which is fine, bcz again it's not black black and white, he is not in the wrong to want to keep it a secret and she's not in the wrong in stating a very innocent fact aka he drank Choco milk.
Viewing this situation as good vs evil is not an accurate stance, bcz both are in the right and the only problem here is instead of communicating with her that his circumstances are particular and even harmless stuff like what he drinks can cause him harm, he instead tried to fire her, not just threatened, he did everything to fire her, but she was clean.
Don't forget that her father has debts to pay, losing her income can cost them more than just income, I was in a situation where I lost my car and house bcz of a loan gone wrong, and had to live pay check to pay check.
Both are privileged. One had a loving family, the other infinite wealth. One had to worry about debts and family, the other had to worry about identity and freedom.
He called her a roach that he can kill, and weeds that he can throw out of the company, so she retaliated in turn…
I think you mustn't have a very good relationship with your mom and sisters. I hope they have someone safe in their lives they can confide in if a man starts caressing their thighs out of the blue. Also if you are a man, I hope you become a safer person to be around and more aware about personal boundaries/crimes like not touching a woman's hands/thighs etc without permission.
Setting aside the fact that you might be sexist, where did they actually shame the male lead? The male lead is…
???
A guy is threatening to fire you cz you saw him drink strawberry milkshake, are you gonna ask him a bout his tragic past? You speak of rational behaviors yet you're asking for unrealistic things. He threatened her and she returned it in kind. Neither is evil, everyone just acts in their best interests. Not everything is black and white.
Setting aside the fact that you might be sexist, where did they actually shame the male lead? The male lead is…
C-crimes?!
The directors all did crimes and she got them fired for it: SA, smoking in unauthorized area etc.
She was not judging him, he hit her car and brushed her off rudely without an apology then in the end she never got to know his contact info for the car damage (I think you'd agree that you wouldn't trust a business card given to you by someone eager to leave, could highly be fake).
This created a bad image of him. Later on she states clearly in episode 2 that just bcz he's the successer doesn't mean he can't dress or act how he likes as long as they're not crimes (although he's her not her style and that's ok, nobody likes everyone).
He insulted her and said he will fire her unjustly, since she's getting fired anyway she might as well speak up. But he is a gentleman and realized he had gone overboard with the whole firing her just bcz she knows he's a sweetheart.
Setting aside the fact that you might be sexist, where did they actually shame the male lead? The male lead is…
he said he can kill her like a roach and fire her if he feels like it, what was she supposed to do, grovel? also if you get such a boss in real life, plz get a new position and resign asap or you're in for hell, bad bosses are worse than unemployment to mental health
Shame? How did FL shame him lol? ML is most of the time a jerk, so....
idk, but the oppa comment is so funny, cz like, you don't watch dramas too? reminded me of kill me, heal me yoona sceaming oppa, hella funny, not even an insult
why every kdrama these days shame ML? do they have to shame ML to project FL as strong every time?
He called her a roach that he can kill, and weeds that he can throw out of the company, so she retaliated in turn by saying you can fire her but not trample on her bcz she has nothing but her hard work to show for and she's not letting people step on her. Don't forget he wants to force her to resign and fire her just because he wants to keep his secrets secret.
Each has their reasons, although both sides are being dramatic quite a bit, this is a rom-com 'drama', not melo. The exaggeration is what makes it fun, nobody wants to see real-life dynamics.
Don't get me wrong, but I keep seeing all these new dramas on reels and TikToks, and then when I check their ratings…
Anything above 8 means fairly decent, plus I see ratings rise with this one, not fall, cz many like myself rate after the drama ends, I'm making an exception for this one because its rating is too low
You forgot to add "in my opinion", because you're opinion is worth nothing outside of your mind.
Half of the second episode was indeed redundant, but I think it was a flaw of directing, if they merged the perspectives to run alongside each other, we wouldn't have felt the drag
Viewing this situation as good vs evil is not an accurate stance, bcz both are in the right and the only problem here is instead of communicating with her that his circumstances are particular and even harmless stuff like what he drinks can cause him harm, he instead tried to fire her, not just threatened, he did everything to fire her, but she was clean.
Don't forget that her father has debts to pay, losing her income can cost them more than just income, I was in a situation where I lost my car and house bcz of a loan gone wrong, and had to live pay check to pay check.
Both are privileged. One had a loving family, the other infinite wealth. One had to worry about debts and family, the other had to worry about identity and freedom.
A guy is threatening to fire you cz you saw him drink strawberry milkshake, are you gonna ask him a bout his tragic past? You speak of rational behaviors yet you're asking for unrealistic things. He threatened her and she returned it in kind. Neither is evil, everyone just acts in their best interests. Not everything is black and white.
The directors all did crimes and she got them fired for it: SA, smoking in unauthorized area etc.
She was not judging him, he hit her car and brushed her off rudely without an apology then in the end she never got to know his contact info for the car damage (I think you'd agree that you wouldn't trust a business card given to you by someone eager to leave, could highly be fake).
This created a bad image of him. Later on she states clearly in episode 2 that just bcz he's the successer doesn't mean he can't dress or act how he likes as long as they're not crimes (although he's her not her style and that's ok, nobody likes everyone).
He insulted her and said he will fire her unjustly, since she's getting fired anyway she might as well speak up. But he is a gentleman and realized he had gone overboard with the whole firing her just bcz she knows he's a sweetheart.
Each has their reasons, although both sides are being dramatic quite a bit, this is a rom-com 'drama', not melo. The exaggeration is what makes it fun, nobody wants to see real-life dynamics.