I understand how you feel but please take into consideration the fact that this is a historical drama...the characters…
The scenes being referenced are pulled from the novel (which amps up the power differential between the leads more than the drama does, apparently, and not in a good way). While it's not historical record, it's not outside the realm of possibility. Had this been a modern day drama, it would've been a very different consumption experience (if at all). I hear you, though, I hated some dramas other people loved, that's the beauty of variety.
I understand how you feel but please take into consideration the fact that this is a historical drama...the characters…
Thanks. The way this drama explores mental, physical abuse, and their ramifications on free will, consent, and abuse of power is really unique in dramaland, at least within the context of a romance. It's not all unicorns and rainbows, that's for sure.
I understand how you feel but please take into consideration the fact that this is a historical drama...the characters…
Agreed, however rather than not needing to be perfect, the story requires that they are imperfect, flawed humans. San was billed as the son of a sinner, he carried a yoke throughout this days as crown prince.
He was constantly told, as a king, he could have anything he wanted. The fact that he *didn't* force himself on her (threatening to bed is not rape, had he done it, though, it would've been) is telling. She kept asking him to punish her, because she knew he wouldn't, and this was his way of playing the power card over her, without actually punishing her. Even having her removed from the palace wasn't punishment - he ensured she'd be well taken care of.
The guy was clueless as to how to win her heart. And for a man - no, a king - in the late 18th century, can we really expect different and still call it true to history?
If we expect 2022 sensibilities out of this drama, then we're watching the wrong genre, or expecting a candy fusion sageuk.
I always found it funny that those who opposed Yi-San’s ascending the throne used the excuse that they didn’t…
100% accurate! Prince Eunjeon was no different than San, as it pertained to Sado, but would've been controllable, whereas San wasn't. Greed knows no logic lol
it was lighter and more like a rom-com at the beginning... things were simpler but now it has gotten more complex…
I loved how the drama tone shifts according to how their story, as individuals and as romantic interests, progressed. If it had remained happy and comical throughout, it would've been a very dishonest adaptation.
I think he absolutely noticed, and pushed her away / sent her away, as part of punishment. It's evil.. See what…
They're both arrogant, though the power he holds allows his threats to be physically menacing, not just emotionally hurtful. Those scenes read like romance novels to the core
https://jlml718.home.blog/2021/12/26/eng-sub-2pm-junho-the-red-sleeve-episode-16-preview/
He was constantly told, as a king, he could have anything he wanted. The fact that he *didn't* force himself on her (threatening to bed is not rape, had he done it, though, it would've been) is telling. She kept asking him to punish her, because she knew he wouldn't, and this was his way of playing the power card over her, without actually punishing her. Even having her removed from the palace wasn't punishment - he ensured she'd be well taken care of.
The guy was clueless as to how to win her heart. And for a man - no, a king - in the late 18th century, can we really expect different and still call it true to history?
If we expect 2022 sensibilities out of this drama, then we're watching the wrong genre, or expecting a candy fusion sageuk.
https://twitter.com/heavenlyswirl/status/1470044799244079104?t=N_8wvuSUjb2gg0MgZO8IKw