W two worlds Season 2 sc

Oh, I'm curious about episode 4 rating now. Thanks.

How can I answer you, lol!? I guess the goal is that of all dramas, to provide intense and warm emotions.
My analysis of the script so far is oriented towards the romantic process and healing. Healing, to what extent? I assume that the ending will leave areas of imperfection and that the characters will never be completely normal, but strong enough to live their love story. Episode 4 gives a lot of clues about that. I wrote this on the dramabitches blog, and a bit here.
Your reaction reminds me of other drama lovers, who often refuse to watch dramas that concern their profession, because they are sure to detect too many flaws in them. If you're a lawyer and you're watching legal drama, it can be edgy. I remember seeing a Hollywood movie that featured an accountant. It was so ridiculous, it made me cry with laughter. ^^

Drawback from episode 3. Maybe the rating will get better after this excellent episode 4.

The meaning of the tale is to be related to what happens in the episode.
The mother helps the child first, but this does not involve her directly. It is when she really sacrifices herself that the child feels the warmth of his mother.
This is the opposite of the parent who just sees his children as tools to be useful, and is willing to sacrifice those who are not, without giving them warmth.
This story is one of the most beautiful parts of the episode, because what FL writes is directly related to the life of the ML. Here, I don't know exactly how because the drama doesn't show much of that at the moment. But the meaning is there. The connection between LF and ML, even before they knew each other.

FL is lost. This is suggested by her wandering when she walks. A very good idea to highlight this, and her difficult progression towards healing and sincere feelings.

I ever seen that, but it's great to see that again. ;-)

Finally, I saw episode 4, thanks to a good person who made me want to ;-)
My opinion is sincere, like the previous time I was very disappointed by episode 3.
The drama is obviously playing with my nerves, because episode 4 denies the bad impression I had temporarily.
It was a fabulous episode. Of course, the pace was a bit too slow for my taste, but the essence was there, with depth and great emotional strength.

I understand how this drama can be problematic in the eyes of a professional. Perhaps you will find the flaws in the drama, which do not conform to reality.
You have to keep in mind the job of a screenwriter in South Korea, which takes place under difficult conditions. Everything has to be done quickly and there is little time to correct. So it has to be good from the first draft, or almost.
- Either the screenwriter was already very knowledgeable about psychological or psychiatric problems. But can she be as knowledgeable as a professional?
- Or she asked for expert advice. But I think it's more like asking her assistant to investigate.
All of which puts clinical realism to the test, and can disappoint a specialist. This is another reason why I have considered behavioural disorders that are not of extreme seriousness, compatible with a romantic story. Perhaps your diagnosis is accurate enough to prove the opposite. But in a drama, what writer could achieve that degree of accuracy?
I'd be curious to read your further comments on drama. I have an idea where this is headed, but no certainty.

Thanks ( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ )
Did you recognize my korean words ? ;-)

Damn, don't take it bad. It's a true story.
I often remember my dreams.
Friendly. ;-)

Not yet entirly. First scene is Woooo! I loved the servant knight protecting the cold queen. It's like they are already together. ;-)
No I'm 10", but it slow down. Flashback scene was great in first sequence, but too soft after. Well... It's the kind of detail I get quick, I don't think it's revelant for most of people.
Now, I quietly continue the episode, See you soon. ;-)

The show is romantic. I mean, everything is done to make it look like any romantic drama. So it's predictable that the audience will feel that way.
Psycho? But it's okay for romantism. ;-D

You re great. ;-)

Arraah, don't spoil!!!
I don't read you.
I didnt see the end of your sentence.
I don't look.
I don't look.
-_-

I wasn't talking about the experience as a model, because everyone has a different life. Rather of the way it unlocks the psychic contents, or the knowledge of the invariant foundations of the psyche.
I am not a psychologist, fortunately, because I would be rather bad at that, my temperament is not balanced enough. It is rather relative to my personal life, which I will evoke little out of modesty. I read books on the subject, which didn't make much sense, when I was young, I forgot about it afterwards. But the meaning came to me through life. I reread books and the knowledge I had gained by myself was displayed in a better way than I could say. It all made sense. It happens in the psychic universe, not in the external framework (brain, neurology).

Both aspects are certainly important: life rich in teaching + theoretical knowledge. I don't consult a psychologist, but I met one many years ago with whom I had some exchanges on this subject. Like you, this gentleman deplored the lack of stability among students and other professionals in this field.

On the other hand, I have a poor view of the serious problems. It is not a subject I have dwelt on. It's in the psychiatric field, or in your field, I suppose.

Today, I've forgotten all that a little bit, because my intensive reading on the subject goes back a few years. I still have an intuitive flair and a regular reminder, a lot of details are gone, but not the foundations of what I was able to discover in conjunction with the theory. As an aside, your experience reminds me of someone I met on another blog, who also talked about the drama.

I wasn't spying on the reviews, it just happened yesterday by accident.
I saw several reviews piling up in the main page of MDL.
I just clicked on the profiles and made this surprising discovery ;-)

Luckily, my friend managed to get through it. But it wasn't her studies that helped her. Just the understanding of the human being through life experience. Her evolution and her questioning, sometimes through traumatic experiences. I often tend to think that a good psychologist would be better with a rich life and a great sense of introspection than with studies. But I don't think that applies to psychiatry, because there, these are severe pathologies that require education and professional experience. I perceive it as a difficult profession, requiring to be confronted with the foreign and very destabilizing side of the human psyche, when the limits of comprehension are exceeded for the common people.
If this is your job, I wish you good luck ;-)

That's why I figured the FL isn't as crazy as it sounds. If she were a sociopath with a level of psychiatric severity, she wouldn't be able to write fairy tales with a positive moral value. They are dark fairy tales, but from the perspective of the witch initiator of truth: learning a life lesson by showing the wrong side, and the punishment that follows if the wrong psychological choice is made. Otherwise, and if her stories were purely morbid, she would not be published for children. She would not be successful, and she would not be invited to tell a story in a psychiatric hospital. She'd be forced to write for adults.
Another example: She makes a moral choice, when she protects the mentally ill guy at her book signing, it costs her a lot in terms of public image.

All these bundles of concordance lead me to think that the two characters are equivalent in their inner worries. And above all, the most important, perfectly complementary, which is the basis of a true love story. They have the opposite faults and qualities, likely to help each other, and this also provokes confrontations and arguments, a necessary process so that everyone can examine themselves inwardly and evolve, and finally make the love story germinate. What leads the characters to do this is their mutual attraction. Otherwise, they would do what anyone else does when they receive an unpleasant remark, just ignore it. It's pretty realistic of what happens in real life, even for people who don't have such serious psychic problems.

I forgot that: it can also break if the confrontation is too strong, but temporarily, if the attraction is as strong as I suppose it is here, and the characters' temperament is balanced. So I think both characters have the same strength of personality, and the same level of mental disorder.

But, how do you make this ?
( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)
Ok, the easy part is ( and ). But others typo ?
천상의 약속
Well, I suppose it's possible... Need a library and copy-past ?

I've created a public list of dramas with a sad ending. It might help you avoid them, until the day you get addicted to sad endings too. LOL!
My observation skills aren't that good, I just notice some details of the story or the direction better than others, and I forget at least as many that were easy to see. ;-)
Since episode 3 bored me, I've already forgotten most of the episode. My concentration increases when I have interest. I guess that's common to a lot of people.