“U dont hear people complain when a 1000yr demon and a 20-something human female are paired in My Demon“ bro I literally got hated for complaining about this including in goblin and the nine tailed fox one
she says "im not trying to put you down" & also "you're stupid, ignorant and jealous" 😂😂
It’s appalling that they agreed with someone who insulted the OP and wished them dead. I can’t stand it when religious people act self-righteous and claim that “God loves everyone” but then spew hatred. That’s hypocrisy.
Your comments are long but the content is trash because you are a piece of trash in society, if you don't like…
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and they have the right to express their views on a fictional drama. Criticizing a drama doesn’t make anyone a judgemental person, it shows that they have a critical mind and can appreciate different aspects of storytelling. In fact, many literary works are based on criticism and analysis of other works, such as parodies, adaptations, and reinterpretations. Criticism is not only a valid form of expression, but also a valuable source of feedback and improvement for the creators and the industry.
I can’t believe you are getting this worked up over a fictional drama, to the point of wishing harm and death to someone you don’t even know. This is not only immature, but also dangerous and irresponsible. You are not only violating the basic rules of civility and decency, but also potentially inciting violence and hatred. You should seek professional help if you have such extreme and irrational reactions to someone else’s opinions. Do you think calling someone disgusting names and wishing them death makes you a better person? Do you think that by doing so, you are showing your support and loyalty to the artist you like? Do you think that the artist would be proud of you or ashamed of you for behaving this way? How would you feel if someone said the same things to you or to someone you care about?
People who cannot tolerate free speech are oppressive and backwards. They are the ones who contribute nothing to human life, except for spreading negativity and intolerance. They are the ones who are contemptible and jealous, because they cannot accept that others have different opinions and tastes. They are the ones who are trash in society, because they have no respect for themselves or others. Please educate yourself and learn to be more open-minded and compassionate
Damn, imagine being this guy.Watching a drama with Ireine, not liking her, going into the comments saying they're…
I am not obsessed with the actress, I am concerned about the message that her roles send to the viewers. I am not wasting my time, I am expressing my opinion and criticism, which is a valid and constructive thing to do. I am not attracted to her, I am disgusted by the way she is portrayed and treated by the writers and directors. I do not find her acting cute or endearing, I find it offensive and demeaning. I do not care if you find my comment funny or ridiculous, I care about the impact that these stories have on women and girls, and on society as a whole. You can mock me or provoke me all you want, but you cannot change the fact that these stories are harmful and damaging, and that they need to be challenged and changed. Topkek.
just coz shes type casted doesn't mean she loves acting like a 12 yr old. pls stay away from her page if ur just…
The actress is not versatile, because she only plays the same type of role - acting like a child and following the lolita concept. I have watched several of her dramas and movies, and I have noticed that she always portrays characters that are naive, innocent, dependent, and childish. She does not show any range or diversity in her acting, and she does not challenge herself to play different or complex characters. I think that this is a waste of her potential, and that she could do better if she tried.
Fiction and dramas have a responsibility to portray women in a realistic and diverse way, not just as cute, ditzy, or clumsy stereotypes. These traits are not just harmless quirks, but rather signs of low self-esteem, insecurity, or lack of competence. They are often used to make the female characters dependent on the male characters, or to create a power imbalance between them. This is not healthy or empowering for women, and it reinforces the idea that women are inferior or subordinate to men. This is not fair or accurate, and it does not reflect the reality or diversity of women in the world.
Having ink on your face and showing a drawing without realizing it is not a common occurrence for adults, especially in a professional setting. It is more likely to happen to children who are still learning and developing their skills and awareness. I find it unrealistic and childish when a story uses this as a way to make the female character seem cute or endearing to the male lead. I prefer stories that show women as mature, independent, and capable individuals who do not need to act like kids to attract men. I think that this is more empowering and respectful to women of all ages.
I disagree with your claim that artistic expression and storytelling often involve pushing boundaries and exploring characters that may not align perfectly with an actor’s own age or personality. This may be true in some cases, but not in the ones that I am criticizing. The problem is not that the actor is playing a character that is younger or different from themselves, but that the character is based on a harmful and sexist trope that objectifies and infantilizes women. The lolita concept, which you seem to ignore, is not just a fashion style or a personal preference, but a cultural phenomenon that has roots in the sexualization of young girls and the fetishization of innocence and vulnerability. This is not a creative or artistic choice, but a deliberate and calculated one that caters to a specific audience and market that profits from the exploitation and oppression of women. You say that the casting decision should be based on the actor’s ability to bring depth and authenticity to the character, but I wonder how much depth and authenticity can be found in a character that is nothing more than a stereotype. How can a woman be portrayed as a complex and realistic human being when she is reduced to a set of clichéd and exaggerated traits that are designed to appeal to the male gaze and fantasy? How can a woman express her own agency and identity when she is constantly dependent on and submissive to a man who treats her like a child or a doll? How can a woman be respected and valued when she is constantly mocked and ridiculed for her lack of competence and confidence? These are not the questions that a story that respects women and challenges gender norms would ask, but the ones that a story that reinforces and perpetuates sexism and misogyny would ask.
I do not think that you understand the impact that these stories have on women and girls, and on society as a whole. They are not harmless or innocent, but harmful and damaging. They create and maintain unrealistic and unhealthy expectations and standards for women and girls, and they influence how they see themselves and how others see them. They contribute to the underrepresentation and misrepresentation of women and girls in the media, and to the discrimination and violence that they face in the real world. They are not empowering or liberating, but oppressive and limiting. They are not artistic or creative, but regressive and oppressive.
Is this about the main actress or is there content like this in the series?
Nobody is pushing anything to the actress, it’s the directors and herself. She is responsible for the roles she picks, and she should be ready to face criticism for them. She keeps repeating the same roles that portray women in a negative light. She is not a child, but an adult who chooses to act like a toddler in her roles. There is nothing wrong with pointing that out, as actors and actresses have a responsibility to avoid roles that reinforce harmful stereotypes. This platform is a place where everyone can express their opinions, as we live in a free and democratic world where free speech is respected. You are being unfair and restrictive by saying “This is not the time, place, or level of appropriate behavior for this platform.” It seems like you have not paid attention to anything that I have said before, which shows your lack of knowledge and intelligence.
Is this about the main actress or is there content like this in the series?
I do not think that I am projecting weird thoughts onto the women who act or dress in a cute or childish way. I am simply pointing out the historical and cultural context that gave rise to this trope, and the harmful and problematic implications that it has for women’s representation and empowerment. I am not saying that all women who act or dress in a cute or childish way are victims or oppressors, or that they have no agency or individuality. I am saying that they are influenced by a system that values and rewards certain forms of femininity over others, and that this system has roots in colonialism, imperialism, and patriarchy. Secondly, commenting on the main actress being childlike and fetishized doesn’t perpetuates further harmful stereotypes. it exposes and challenges the stereotypes that are already present in the media and society. I think that it is important to critique the media that we consume, and to question the messages that it sends about women, especially women of color. It is also important to hold the media accountable for the impact that it has on the audience, especially the young and impressionable audience. Thirdly, I do not think that there are many women who act “cute” in real life, or that this is a natural or normal way of being. I think that this is a learned and performed behavior, that is influenced by social and cultural norms, expectations, and pressures. This behavior is often rewarded with attention, approval, and affection, but also comes with a cost of being seen as less competent, mature, and respectable. I think that this behavior also limits the range and diversity of women’s expressions and identities, and reduces them to a single, narrow, and stereotypical image. It is gross and worse than strange that a grown woman who has education to know what is right and wrong is actively picking roles that devalue women. The fact that the actress is thirty makes it even worse.
First of all, I don’t think that people who criticize this trope have dirty minds. I think they have valid concerns…
I am not hating the actress, I am criticizing the roles she is playing. The industry is not an excuse for perpetuating harmful and problematic portrayals of women. Everyone has the right to call out the issues that they see in the media.
I can’t believe you are getting this worked up over a fictional drama, to the point of wishing harm and death to someone you don’t even know. This is not only immature, but also dangerous and irresponsible. You are not only violating the basic rules of civility and decency, but also potentially inciting violence and hatred. You should seek professional help if you have such extreme and irrational reactions to someone else’s opinions.
Do you think calling someone disgusting names and wishing them death makes you a better person? Do you think that by doing so, you are showing your support and loyalty to the artist you like? Do you think that the artist would be proud of you or ashamed of you for behaving this way? How would you feel if someone said the same things to you or to someone you care about?
People who cannot tolerate free speech are oppressive and backwards. They are the ones who contribute nothing to human life, except for spreading negativity and intolerance. They are the ones who are contemptible and jealous, because they cannot accept that others have different opinions and tastes. They are the ones who are trash in society, because they have no respect for themselves or others. Please educate yourself and learn to be more open-minded and compassionate
Fiction and dramas have a responsibility to portray women in a realistic and diverse way, not just as cute, ditzy, or clumsy stereotypes. These traits are not just harmless quirks, but rather signs of low self-esteem, insecurity, or lack of competence. They are often used to make the female characters dependent on the male characters, or to create a power imbalance between them. This is not healthy or empowering for women, and it reinforces the idea that women are inferior or subordinate to men. This is not fair or accurate, and it does not reflect the reality or diversity of women in the world.
Having ink on your face and showing a drawing without realizing it is not a common occurrence for adults, especially in a professional setting. It is more likely to happen to children who are still learning and developing their skills and awareness. I find it unrealistic and childish when a story uses this as a way to make the female character seem cute or endearing to the male lead. I prefer stories that show women as mature, independent, and capable individuals who do not need to act like kids to attract men. I think that this is more empowering and respectful to women of all ages.
I disagree with your claim that artistic expression and storytelling often involve pushing boundaries and exploring characters that may not align perfectly with an actor’s own age or personality. This may be true in some cases, but not in the ones that I am criticizing. The problem is not that the actor is playing a character that is younger or different from themselves, but that the character is based on a harmful and sexist trope that objectifies and infantilizes women. The lolita concept, which you seem to ignore, is not just a fashion style or a personal preference, but a cultural phenomenon that has roots in the sexualization of young girls and the fetishization of innocence and vulnerability. This is not a creative or artistic choice, but a deliberate and calculated one that caters to a specific audience and market that profits from the exploitation and oppression of women.
You say that the casting decision should be based on the actor’s ability to bring depth and authenticity to the character, but I wonder how much depth and authenticity can be found in a character that is nothing more than a stereotype. How can a woman be portrayed as a complex and realistic human being when she is reduced to a set of clichéd and exaggerated traits that are designed to appeal to the male gaze and fantasy? How can a woman express her own agency and identity when she is constantly dependent on and submissive to a man who treats her like a child or a doll? How can a woman be respected and valued when she is constantly mocked and ridiculed for her lack of competence and confidence? These are not the questions that a story that respects women and challenges gender norms would ask, but the ones that a story that reinforces and perpetuates sexism and misogyny would ask.
I do not think that you understand the impact that these stories have on women and girls, and on society as a whole. They are not harmless or innocent, but harmful and damaging. They create and maintain unrealistic and unhealthy expectations and standards for women and girls, and they influence how they see themselves and how others see them. They contribute to the underrepresentation and misrepresentation of women and girls in the media, and to the discrimination and violence that they face in the real world. They are not empowering or liberating, but oppressive and limiting. They are not artistic or creative, but regressive and oppressive.