Episode 64... OMG! Getting down on one knee for a business-arranged marriage? WTF is this? Boom Shakalaka! MJ is finally starting to remember—that's more like it! YN fake colored hair and clothing out of here ( she looks good tho impersonated JJ ) " Now we're talking! InspectorM WTFAY? 😂 Boom! Epi 65 tonight. Can't wait.
yeah sure after you "protected" MJ by not telling him the truth, he TRUSTED lmao and dated YN and almost…
HOLD UP! Police! InspectorMegre is robbing me here. Are you an inspector or not?
It's a medical condition, so proceed with caution. The unnecessary headaches and memory-loss plot are already difficult enough.
The biggest problem is Yu Na, the imposter. That plot feels completely unnecessary and only causes more pain and frustration. NEVER asked for that storyline.
ALWAYS wanted J & J to be together. No marriage between Chloe and HJ, please! That's my ideal plot.
Hopefully the K-director and K-writer will show some mercy before it's too late. Fake love, empty-shell love, and one-sided love NEVER LAST (typical of KD ) J & J deserve their chance to be together NATURALLY.
Jeong Ran, you villainess baby! Feel so sorry for you. OMG, what great acting! Those evil, devilish eyes and that attitude — she makes such a convincing villain.
Please save the Darth Vader scene for later. Geun Tae : Hyeon Jun, I am your father. ( Emotional damage )
And please, stop torturing the best duo couple, J&J! They've suffered enough already.
Haven't had time to watch Episode 64 yet, but judging from the way things are going, I'm expecting more drama, more tears, and probably more Jeong Ran chaos.
well.. most korean bls do that 😔anywaysss.. as i understand how u feel..i'd like to invite u to watch thai…
No production company will produce a movie, K-drama, J-drama, or C-drama according to every viewer's preferences. However, the problem with ASTCO is the abuse of power, the shameless and nonsensical BL plot, and Kdirectors who seemingly did not care about the Kaudience's concerns who do not DARE to criticized ( not inter audience )
The issue is whether Kdirectors give viewers something positive to say: "Wow, that was so sweet. Kudos and respect to the Kdirectors." Instead, for many viewers, the reaction is the complete opposite. And a FU is in order.
Choose your projects and career direction wisely. There is no justification for a no kissing scenes ( even when they were locked up in the storage ) "they are in the same K-pop group" BS They are actors. No? Viewers are still entitled to criticize a story they find poorly written, forced, or disrespectful to the audience intelligence. This ASTCO ( whose crying on whose shoulder for comfort and love ) was Kdirectors interior motives THAT'S FOR SURE.
So ur only problem is that the chemistry is not working btw them? Why tf r u analyzing this supposed love when…
Father and daughter? That's even worse. At the very least, show some family respect and a genuine father–daughter bond. They're family, after all.
A father–daughter dynamic isn't something that can carry an entire KD as a romantic substitute, especially when she seemed more interested in his young body than in the spirit, wisdom, and personality of the father himself. If that's the direction they're taking, then keep the relationship cordial, respectful, and focused on family rather than forcing something uncomfortable and fighting about everything and nothing.
Some K-dramas rely too heavily on toxic relationship tropes and forced romantic development, which can make the romance feel unrealistic and frustrating to watch. It's difficult to watch RR's nice guy pairing with a BB Lee Joo Myung's character, Kang Bang Geul. That character constantly grabbed, hit, and disrespected the male lead, which really got on my nerves. It followed a common K-drama trope where rude or aggressive behavior eventually gets turned into a love story. As a result, the romance feels forced rather than genuine. I just can't buy into the chemistry because all I see is that previous character. The "love" feels fake, the romance feels manufactured, and it's hard to enjoy the pairing .FAKE LOVE not MAKE BELIEVE.
the change of events in this drama are great ! .. excellent pace and always looking forward to the next episode…
Bingo! And incestuous , kissing brother Baek Ho and sister Jang Mi IF they are not related it's criminal/ killer /murderer grandfather and victim grandson heir to dream in a romantic relationship 😆
Wow! Now that’s what I call romantic. That’s what I call a genuinely great, friendly, and chemistry-filled pairing. Business proposal doesn’t stand a chance against them! Buying great reviews for her? 😆 Between the punching, the rudeness, the fake bed scenes, and all the other eyesores, “sold out on you” takes on a whole new meaning, this little K-romance is sweet, charming, and full of eye candy. Boom Shakalaka!
Episode 60 was heartbreaking, though not entirely surprising when it came to Hyeon Jun's DNA results. What was truly devastating was HJ overhearing the truth about his mother's crimes. No child—whether young or grown—should have to learn that his own mother was responsible for the hit-and-run and even tried to kill Min Jun twice and Chloe as well. Hyeon Jun is innocent. He never asked to be born to Geun Tae and Jeong Ran, yet he is the one suffering the consequences of their actions.
My heart broke for Geun Tae. He was clearly in pain while trying to explain to Jeong Ran that he never betrayed her, it's about Hyeon Jun. He doesn't want HJ to live the rest of his life of being a murderer's son.
The most dreadful moment still lies ahead: how, when, and from whom Hyeon Jun will learn that he is not a Jun at all, but a Tae. That revelation is bound to be devastating.
As for Jeong Ran, drugging and kidnapping the Chairman proves that she has completely lost control. How much further is she willing to go before she finally ends up in jail? Another hit-and-run???
Chloe no longer needs HJ. The painful separation and emotional dependency seem to be over at last. Bet on a little romance between Jun and Ju exactly what is needed to help Min Jun reconnect with his true memories and return to his loved one Chloe/ Jin Ju
Yu Na certainly looks beautiful with her new makeover, but her fake, one-sided love persona remains difficult to watch. Her obsessive and compulsive fixation on someone she claims to love is causing far more harm than good. Instead of helping Min Jun heal, her actions continue to manipulate, confuse, and damage the very person she insists she cares about. Skipped, fast-forward
Seriously just take your homophobic self and go away. YOU are the problem here.
Is MDL belong to your family? Your property? 😂 Homophobic! Are you new to MDL 😂 "You can't even conduct a decent reply/ conversation /debate without relying on semantic technicalities. Rather than addressing the substance of the discussion, you hide behind wordplay, nitpicking, and off-topic arguments. It's a tactic that shifts attention away from the real issue instead of engaging with it honestly."
I would like to point out firstly, the one's you agree with you and the one's who disagree with you - both have…
The issue being discussed is not about freedom of the press, free speech, or an individual's constitutional rights.
The central concern is the separation between religious doctrine and the entertainment industry, particularly when topics such as homosexuality are presented alongside religious themes. That is the point of the discussion. Instead of focusing on personalities, motives, or unrelated accusations, the conversation should remain on whether entertainment productions should draw clearer boundaries when incorporating religious concepts into stories that may conflict with the teachings of certain faiths.
Yes, please get out and never come back. It’s people like you that make this world worse. You hide behind your…
Comparing a university curriculum to an elementary school curriculum is not a valid comparison. They serve different educational purposes and are designed for students at vastly different intellectual and developmental stages.
This was about agreeing or disagreeing. The discussion was about whether there should be a boundary between film production and religion. Instead of addressing that point, some commenters chose to go off-topic, attack the person making the argument, and focus on everything except the actual issue being raised.
When a discussion shifts from debating ideas to criticizing individuals, it often suggests an inability or unwillingness to engage with the argument itself. Whether that's immaturity, defensiveness, jealousy, or simple bad-faith discussion, the result is the same: the original topic gets buried.
Rather than discussing the concept of separating religion from entertainment and film production, the conversation became a distraction filled with assumptions and personal remarks. Disagree with the idea if you want, but address the idea. Turning the discussion into personal attacks contributes nothing meaningful to the conversation. 😂 Boom Shakalaka! HNICH.
I haven't seen any criticism about this topic . You are the first one .
This is not really a criticism of the genre itself, but more of a concern about boundaries. In my view, the entertainment industry should be careful when mixing religion with film and television, especially in stories centered on romance or sexuality. Much like the principle of the separation of church and state, I believe film production should remain neutral regarding religious doctrine rather than incorporating it into storylines in ways that may be perceived as controversial or disrespectful.
For many believers, religious teachings are sacred. When religion is introduced into a script primarily to comment on or debate issues such as homosexuality, it can feel unnecessary because audiences are already aware of what major religions teach on the subject. For example, some Christians point to biblical passages that describe homosexual acts as sinful, while other Christians interpret those passages differently. Regardless of where people stand, those religious discussions already exist outside of entertainment.
From this perspective, including religion in such storylines may create the impression that sacred beliefs are being used as a plot device or are being mocked, even if that was not the creators' intention. It may be wiser to keep faith and entertainment separate, allowing religious matters to remain within their own sphere while letting films focus on storytelling without invoking religious doctrine.
Everyone is entitled to their beliefs, and everyone is entitled to enjoy entertainment. Maintaining a respectful boundary between artistic freedom and religious faith can help avoid unnecessary conflict and allow both to coexist without diminishing the other. It can feel as though invoking God or religious teachings in this type of storyline turns sacred beliefs into entertainment, which some believers may view as disrespectful. Because these teachings originate from religious texts such as the Bible, there should be a clear boundary between artistic freedom in the entertainment industry and matters of faith.
For many religious people, there is no need to incorporate religion into these scripts, especially when the story is not fundamentally about faith. According to traditional biblical teachings, homosexuality is considered a sin or an abomination, and many religions have established doctrines on the subject. Whether or not modern society follows those teachings is a separate issue.
My point is not about restricting entertainment, but about respecting religious beliefs. When religion is inserted into a storyline unnecessarily, it can come across as a mockery or misrepresentation of God and sacred teachings. It may be wiser to keep religious doctrine separate from entertainment ( The separation of church and state and public schools ) when it is not essential to the plot, particularly when the audience is already familiar with those religious views and the moral principles associated with them.
Thailand, you can produce BL dramas day in and day out, and people will still watch and enjoy them for what they are — entertainment. But one thing many viewers strongly feel is that religion should be kept separate from it. Keep religion private. Everybody already knows what many religions traditionally say about BL and same-sex relationships. Those beliefs have existed for centuries and are considered by followers to be religious or moral laws.
At the same time, entertainment is entertainment. People watch dramas for emotions, storytelling, escapism, chemistry, and creativity. Once religion is dragged directly into the conversation, especially in a preachy or provocative way, it changes the atmosphere completely and creates unnecessary division, backlash, and hostility among viewers from different cultures and beliefs.
That is why bringing religion into BL content or promotional discussions can feel like a huge mistake to some audiences. It turns something fictional into a moral or ideological battlefield. Many fans simply want to enjoy the series without religious debates being forced into the middle of it. “Do as thou wilt” may work as a personal philosophy for some people, but mixing entertainment, religion, and moral provocation together is a dangerous combination that can easily spark outrage and controversy.
People can support BL, dislike BL, or remain neutral — that is their personal choice. But using religion as a weapon in entertainment discourse often pushes things too far and risks offending audiences on every side. Sometimes the smartest approach is simple: let entertainment stay entertainment, let faith stay personal, and avoid crossing lines that will only create chaos and resentment. Wait for the wrath of "nature " and see " Do as thy wilt " take Thailand. Gemini, love ya, baby but $$$ and religion don't mix ... Shouldn't touch this with a 10 foot poll. Done. Out of here.
Boom Shakalaka! MJ is finally starting to remember—that's more like it! YN fake colored hair and clothing out of here ( she looks good tho impersonated JJ ) " Now we're talking! InspectorM WTFAY? 😂 Boom!
Epi 65 tonight. Can't wait.
It's a medical condition, so proceed with caution. The unnecessary headaches and memory-loss plot are already difficult enough.
The biggest problem is Yu Na, the imposter. That plot feels completely unnecessary and only causes more pain and frustration. NEVER asked for that storyline.
ALWAYS wanted J & J to be together. No marriage between Chloe and HJ, please! That's my ideal plot.
Hopefully the K-director and K-writer will show some mercy before it's too late. Fake love, empty-shell love, and one-sided love NEVER LAST (typical of KD ) J & J deserve their chance to be together NATURALLY.
Please save the Darth Vader scene for later. Geun Tae : Hyeon Jun, I am your father. ( Emotional damage )
And please, stop torturing the best duo couple, J&J! They've suffered enough already.
Haven't had time to watch Episode 64 yet, but judging from the way things are going, I'm expecting more drama, more tears, and probably more Jeong Ran chaos.
The issue is whether Kdirectors give viewers something positive to say: "Wow, that was so sweet. Kudos and respect to the Kdirectors." Instead, for many viewers, the reaction is the complete opposite. And a FU is in order.
Choose your projects and career direction wisely. There is no justification for a no kissing scenes ( even when they were locked up in the storage ) "they are in the same K-pop group" BS They are actors. No? Viewers are still entitled to criticize a story they find poorly written, forced, or disrespectful to the audience intelligence. This ASTCO ( whose crying on whose shoulder for comfort and love ) was Kdirectors interior motives THAT'S FOR SURE.
A father–daughter dynamic isn't something that can carry an entire KD as a romantic substitute, especially when she seemed more interested in his young body than in the spirit, wisdom, and personality of the father himself. If that's the direction they're taking, then keep the relationship cordial, respectful, and focused on family rather than forcing something uncomfortable and fighting about everything and nothing.
It's difficult to watch RR's nice guy pairing with a BB Lee Joo Myung's character, Kang Bang Geul. That character constantly grabbed, hit, and disrespected the male lead, which really got on my nerves. It followed a common K-drama trope where rude or aggressive behavior eventually gets turned into a love story. As a result, the romance feels forced rather than genuine. I just can't buy into the chemistry because all I see is that previous character. The "love" feels fake, the romance feels manufactured, and it's hard to enjoy the pairing .FAKE LOVE not MAKE BELIEVE.
J &J romantic duo, can't wait...
Business proposal doesn’t stand a chance against them! Buying great reviews for her? 😆 Between the punching, the rudeness, the fake bed scenes, and all the other eyesores,
“sold out on you” takes on a whole new meaning, this little K-romance is sweet, charming, and full of eye candy. Boom Shakalaka!
My heart broke for Geun Tae. He was clearly in pain while trying to explain to Jeong Ran that he never betrayed her, it's about Hyeon Jun. He doesn't want HJ to live the rest of his life of being a murderer's son.
The most dreadful moment still lies ahead: how, when, and from whom Hyeon Jun will learn that he is not a Jun at all, but a Tae. That revelation is bound to be devastating.
As for Jeong Ran, drugging and kidnapping the Chairman proves that she has completely lost control. How much further is she willing to go before she finally ends up in jail? Another hit-and-run???
Chloe no longer needs HJ. The painful separation and emotional dependency seem to be over at last. Bet on a little romance between Jun and Ju exactly what is needed to help Min Jun reconnect with his true memories and return to his loved one Chloe/ Jin Ju
Yu Na certainly looks beautiful with her new makeover, but her fake, one-sided love persona remains difficult to watch. Her obsessive and compulsive fixation on someone she claims to love is causing far more harm than good. Instead of helping Min Jun heal, her actions continue to manipulate, confuse, and damage the very person she insists she cares about. Skipped, fast-forward
😂 Homophobic! Are you new to MDL 😂
"You can't even conduct a decent reply/ conversation /debate without relying on semantic technicalities. Rather than addressing the substance of the discussion, you hide behind wordplay, nitpicking, and off-topic arguments. It's a tactic that shifts attention away from the real issue instead of engaging with it honestly."
The central concern is the separation between religious doctrine and the entertainment industry, particularly when topics such as homosexuality are presented alongside religious themes. That is the point of the discussion.
Instead of focusing on personalities, motives, or unrelated accusations, the conversation should remain on whether entertainment productions should draw clearer boundaries when incorporating religious concepts into stories that may conflict with the teachings of certain faiths.
When a discussion shifts from debating ideas to criticizing individuals, it often suggests an inability or unwillingness to engage with the argument itself. Whether that's immaturity, defensiveness, jealousy, or simple bad-faith discussion, the result is the same: the original topic gets buried.
Rather than discussing the concept of separating religion from entertainment and film production, the conversation became a distraction filled with assumptions and personal remarks. Disagree with the idea if you want, but address the idea. Turning the discussion into personal attacks contributes nothing meaningful to the conversation. 😂
Boom Shakalaka! HNICH.
For many believers, religious teachings are sacred. When religion is introduced into a script primarily to comment on or debate issues such as homosexuality, it can feel unnecessary because audiences are already aware of what major religions teach on the subject. For example, some Christians point to biblical passages that describe homosexual acts as sinful, while other Christians interpret those passages differently. Regardless of where people stand, those religious discussions already exist outside of entertainment.
From this perspective, including religion in such storylines may create the impression that sacred beliefs are being used as a plot device or are being mocked, even if that was not the creators' intention. It may be wiser to keep faith and entertainment separate, allowing religious matters to remain within their own sphere while letting films focus on storytelling without invoking religious doctrine.
Everyone is entitled to their beliefs, and everyone is entitled to enjoy entertainment. Maintaining a respectful boundary between artistic freedom and religious faith can help avoid unnecessary conflict and allow both to coexist without diminishing the other.
It can feel as though invoking God or religious teachings in this type of storyline turns sacred beliefs into entertainment, which some believers may view as disrespectful. Because these teachings originate from religious texts such as the Bible, there should be a clear boundary between artistic freedom in the entertainment industry and matters of faith.
For many religious people, there is no need to incorporate religion into these scripts, especially when the story is not fundamentally about faith. According to traditional biblical teachings, homosexuality is considered a sin or an abomination, and many religions have established doctrines on the subject. Whether or not modern society follows those teachings is a separate issue.
My point is not about restricting entertainment, but about respecting religious beliefs. When religion is inserted into a storyline unnecessarily, it can come across as a mockery or misrepresentation of God and sacred teachings. It may be wiser to keep religious doctrine separate from entertainment ( The separation of church and state and public schools ) when it is not essential to the plot, particularly when the audience is already familiar with those religious views and the moral principles associated with them.
At the same time, entertainment is entertainment. People watch dramas for emotions, storytelling, escapism, chemistry, and creativity. Once religion is dragged directly into the conversation, especially in a preachy or provocative way, it changes the atmosphere completely and creates unnecessary division, backlash, and hostility among viewers from different cultures and beliefs.
That is why bringing religion into BL content or promotional discussions can feel like a huge mistake to some audiences. It turns something fictional into a moral or ideological battlefield. Many fans simply want to enjoy the series without religious debates being forced into the middle of it. “Do as thou wilt” may work as a personal philosophy for some people, but mixing entertainment, religion, and moral provocation together is a dangerous combination that can easily spark outrage and controversy.
People can support BL, dislike BL, or remain neutral — that is their personal choice. But using religion as a weapon in entertainment discourse often pushes things too far and risks offending audiences on every side. Sometimes the smartest approach is simple: let entertainment stay entertainment, let faith stay personal, and avoid crossing lines that will only create chaos and resentment. Wait for the wrath of "nature " and see " Do as thy wilt " take Thailand.
Gemini, love ya, baby but $$$ and religion don't mix ... Shouldn't touch this with a 10 foot poll.
Done. Out of here.