It isn't. This is the doctrine of the left, Kamala said it so many times you believe it. Without an us and them…
my high school diploma has been gathering dust. after 8 years, it’s still worth more than your ged in "anti-intellectualism" from the trump university of youtube
i'm touched that you're trying to prepare me for a career in politics! thank you for the vote of confidence
as for trump 2025, we'll be enjoying that together ... in the post-apocalyptic wasteland that will follow
the enduring presence of explicit scenes in korean movies doesn't demand acceptance or tolerance from all viewers.…
"And that's exactly what you came here to do"
on the contrary, you and op "came here to do that." op expressed discontent with others "whining" and engaged in the same whining they condemned. i only called attention to the hypocrisy
"You distorted what I said the other day"
you made vague and sweeping comments about how women should behave, you can't expect everyone to interpret them as you intended
your comment was that childless, sex-averse korean women should "learn" from their foremothers, who were deprived of reproductive autonomy. i pointed out the dark implications of your comment. based on my experience, individuals bemoaning the declining birth rates of today's society are seldom individuals of admirable character. there was no reason to assume you're different
"It is you, who selectively tries to discredit other peoples complaints"
i don't selectively allow or disallow complaints, your paranoia is unwarranted
Why are you dragging Kim Nam Gil for dropping the drama? It was a smart move. He's an amazing actor with good…
it seems there was a misunderstanding—allow me to explain myself
the mere presence of darkness in fiction doesn't concern me, it's the manner in which it's broached, the care with which it's treated and framed. i consider myself quite the fan of thrillers and horrors, particularly those that burrow deep into the psyche, unearth the darkness of society, and tackle the likes of homophobia, misogyny, racism, rape culture, police brutality, celebrity worship, broken "justice" system, etc, with sensitivity and finesse to invite discourse and potential solutions to these ills
when voicing concern over nam gil's character in "no regret," i didn't mean that characters with similar behaviors should be removed from media/fiction altogether. if that were the case, i'd have no interest in the movie. i've managed to watch half of it, and i'll admit, the gay relationship is impressively ahead of its time (2006)
i appreciate dark media, light media, or media that blends darkness and light, so long as the darkness is approached thoughtfully
It isn't. This is the doctrine of the left, Kamala said it so many times you believe it. Without an us and them…
it is, xenophobia isn't a figment of "leftist doctrine" or the product of a grand, conspiratorial narrative. your "doctrine" is to deny reality and the experiences of countless individuals who have faced discrimination based on their perceived "otherness"
the "us vs. them" mentality has pervaded human interactions long before the construction of modern political ideologies such as leftism. both left and right are susceptible to the mentality, as evidenced by your own demonization of the left
there are instances where censorship is necessary and justified. the "free marketplace of ideas" doesn't magically…
leaning on the term "woke" as a means of discrediting divergent perspectives is a regrettable absence of conversational prowess. i believe our exchange would prove less than meaningful and advise that you seek out another conversational partner
the enduring presence of explicit scenes in korean movies doesn't demand acceptance or tolerance from all viewers.…
whining about other people whining contributes to the cacophony of whiners, achieving little in the process. the producers are unlikely to encounter your online feuds on mdl. it is unproductive
name-calling or labeling the people disagreeing with you as "annoying," "self-centered," and "spoiled" reflects poorly on your maturity. if we're to identify the insufferable, immature party in this scenario, it's hardly those who voiced their concerns about explicit scenes/content
sexuality is a personal experience. some individuals feel a strong connection to their sexual identity, others…
censorship might be a violation of one's freedom of expression, but the pressure to engage in "sexual" activity and have children equally amounts to psychological manipulation and violation of freedom. this pressure rests on the premise that individual desires are inferior to societal expectations. it denies individuals the freedom to make choices about their own lives and bodies, and that's what you did, you expected current korean people to follow the example of their ancestors whose women were subjected to frequent sexual assault and had limited reproductive autonomy
your comment: "this current sex-averse generation of Koreans should learn from their Queens of old. It might help them with their abysmal birth rates"
It's funny how weirdos obsessed with Korea are whining about sex scenes being western when Koreans have so many…
the enduring presence of explicit scenes in korean movies doesn't demand acceptance or tolerance from all viewers. whining about the viewers who express discomfort with such scenes is as unproductive and obsessive as the whining you're criticizing
Perhaps this current sex-averse generation of Koreans should learn from their Queens of old. It might help them…
sexuality is a personal experience. some individuals feel a strong connection to their sexual identity, others feel little or no attraction and that’s okay. there's no reason to blame them for declining birth rates. there are different factors contributing to declining birth rates worldwide, including the rising cost of living and increased focus on career and personal growth over traditional family structures
you can't complain about censorship and advocate for freedom while simultaneously denying that freedom to sex-averse people by pressuring them to engage in "sexual" activity and have children. freedom means respecting and valuing the choices of all individuals, sex-averse or not
Why are you dragging Kim Nam Gil for dropping the drama? It was a smart move. He's an amazing actor with good…
the events described in your comment don't reflect good morals, infidelity and deceit aren't acceptable behaviors in any relationship
it concerns me that some men treat their relationships with other men as stepping stones or fleeting moments of distraction before moving on to a woman. men should recognize and respect each other as more than just disposable objects. they are individuals with their own worth and value. however, i plan to watch "no regret." i'm curious to see kim nam gil's performance there
Respect for Kim Muyeol for not bending to the nattering nabobs.I haven't researched the controversy, but censorship…
there are instances where censorship is necessary and justified. the "free marketplace of ideas" doesn't magically correct itself. the market gets clogged with so much disinformation and discrimination that truth and decency can't get through
the act of voicing criticisms towards the webtoon was an appropriate display of free speech, and the creators were free to respond in kind. that said, they themselves taking the nuclear option and self-destructing their content appears to be a drastic, over-reactive response to the criticisms. (explicit) content that fetishizes the female body, reinforces gender roles, and romanticizes abusive dynamics proliferates with disturbing ease on the internet. the cancellation of a single webtoon for alleged racial insensitivity or "violence" is an example of selective censorship that doesn't meaningfully address the underlying systemic issues fueling the creation, dissemination, and consumption of such content
criticism, not cancellation, would've been an effective means of promoting growth and improvement in the creators. they could've rectified the problematic chapters and emerged from them with a more socially-aware understanding
the suicides of korean celebrities shouldn't be treated as isolated incidents, they're part of a wider "epidemic" in the country. with suicide rates already high, some celebrities would succumb to the same fate. placing the blame on a single factor, whether it be loneliness, mismanagement by agencies, or online harassment, would be an oversimplification
Loneliness is killing them not trolling,no open relationships,so many restrictions,,in India celebrities are trolled…
relationships aren't a magic elixir for the ailments of isolation and loneliness. even in the warm embrace of a partner, the icy fingers of loneliness cling to one's heart
some choose singlehood. they don't risk the calamity of cohabitation with another flawed human, and they're not suicidal
i know well that the darkness of human nature would exacerbate my feelings of isolation and loneliness in a relationship. i'd be further misunderstood. and thus, if i were a celebrity, i would heed the well-intentioned advice of my management/agency and fans to forgo the trappings of relationships. i'd belong to my art, and my solitude would be my sanctuary
This is a good show, very well done, but I sincerely hope none of these people end up together. I hope they all…
banishing these characters to opposite corners of the globe would be a drastic measure. what if, instead, we were to watch them undergo intensive therapy and character development?
only a poorly executed story could succeed in inspiring some viewers to root against a main couple's romance. the drama needs a season 2 to rectify the issues plaguing season 1, or a spin-off featuring less toxic characters we can root for
i'm touched that you're trying to prepare me for a career in politics! thank you for the vote of confidence
as for trump 2025, we'll be enjoying that together ... in the post-apocalyptic wasteland that will follow
on the contrary, you and op "came here to do that." op expressed discontent with others "whining" and engaged in the same whining they condemned. i only called attention to the hypocrisy
"You distorted what I said the other day"
you made vague and sweeping comments about how women should behave, you can't expect everyone to interpret them as you intended
your comment was that childless, sex-averse korean women should "learn" from their foremothers, who were deprived of reproductive autonomy. i pointed out the dark implications of your comment. based on my experience, individuals bemoaning the declining birth rates of today's society are seldom individuals of admirable character. there was no reason to assume you're different
"It is you, who selectively tries to discredit other peoples complaints"
i don't selectively allow or disallow complaints, your paranoia is unwarranted
the mere presence of darkness in fiction doesn't concern me, it's the manner in which it's broached, the care with which it's treated and framed. i consider myself quite the fan of thrillers and horrors, particularly those that burrow deep into the psyche, unearth the darkness of society, and tackle the likes of homophobia, misogyny, racism, rape culture, police brutality, celebrity worship, broken "justice" system, etc, with sensitivity and finesse to invite discourse and potential solutions to these ills
when voicing concern over nam gil's character in "no regret," i didn't mean that characters with similar behaviors should be removed from media/fiction altogether. if that were the case, i'd have no interest in the movie. i've managed to watch half of it, and i'll admit, the gay relationship is impressively ahead of its time (2006)
i appreciate dark media, light media, or media that blends darkness and light, so long as the darkness is approached thoughtfully
the "us vs. them" mentality has pervaded human interactions long before the construction of modern political ideologies such as leftism. both left and right are susceptible to the mentality, as evidenced by your own demonization of the left
name-calling or labeling the people disagreeing with you as "annoying," "self-centered," and "spoiled" reflects poorly on your maturity. if we're to identify the insufferable, immature party in this scenario, it's hardly those who voiced their concerns about explicit scenes/content
your comment: "this current sex-averse generation of Koreans should learn from their Queens of old. It might help them with their abysmal birth rates"
you can't complain about censorship and advocate for freedom while simultaneously denying that freedom to sex-averse people by pressuring them to engage in "sexual" activity and have children. freedom means respecting and valuing the choices of all individuals, sex-averse or not
it concerns me that some men treat their relationships with other men as stepping stones or fleeting moments of distraction before moving on to a woman. men should recognize and respect each other as more than just disposable objects. they are individuals with their own worth and value. however, i plan to watch "no regret." i'm curious to see kim nam gil's performance there
the act of voicing criticisms towards the webtoon was an appropriate display of free speech, and the creators were free to respond in kind. that said, they themselves taking the nuclear option and self-destructing their content appears to be a drastic, over-reactive response to the criticisms. (explicit) content that fetishizes the female body, reinforces gender roles, and romanticizes abusive dynamics proliferates with disturbing ease on the internet. the cancellation of a single webtoon for alleged racial insensitivity or "violence" is an example of selective censorship that doesn't meaningfully address the underlying systemic issues fueling the creation, dissemination, and consumption of such content
criticism, not cancellation, would've been an effective means of promoting growth and improvement in the creators. they could've rectified the problematic chapters and emerged from them with a more socially-aware understanding
some choose singlehood. they don't risk the calamity of cohabitation with another flawed human, and they're not suicidal
i know well that the darkness of human nature would exacerbate my feelings of isolation and loneliness in a relationship. i'd be further misunderstood. and thus, if i were a celebrity, i would heed the well-intentioned advice of my management/agency and fans to forgo the trappings of relationships. i'd belong to my art, and my solitude would be my sanctuary
only a poorly executed story could succeed in inspiring some viewers to root against a main couple's romance. the drama needs a season 2 to rectify the issues plaguing season 1, or a spin-off featuring less toxic characters we can root for
i'm working on a fmv, and i'm only holding off on completion until i can review the last two episodes for any suitable clips!
here's a screenshot of my work in progress: https://imgur.com/k8KkXeU