GayinYourArea

right or wrong, moral or immoral, healthy or toxic are matters of opinion. in your opinion, it's okay for celebrities to "date." asian fans don't have to agree with that opinion

"... because it all became more global, bc this type of fan behaviour was called out as toxic and unhealthy"

translation: self-entitled westerners are okay with telling non-westerners what to do, but aren't okay with non-western fans telling celebrities what to do

they are everywhere in the comment section. earlier, they said two celebrities who don't deny their "dating" rumors "must be together." block the creep for your mental health. that's what i did

the low quality video of "them" walking down the streets? zoomed in, the man looked nothing like taehyung. even if he were taehyung, the video was cooked up by yg and hybe

blackpink and bts aren't active groups. blackpink go over a year without a comeback. their music isn't new or refreshing. and they don't have a good stage presence. bts are enlisting in the military. their agencies can't bank on the pulling-power of their fading idols. they use "dating" news to stay relevant

taehyung and jennie didn't address the rumors, because they aren't together. they are milking the rumors dry

you shouldn't comment on their private lives, and you are. why wouldn't i comment?

you don't understand how celebrities work. publicity enhances consumer recognition of a brand name. celebrities are brand names. they are products that their agencies sell to their fans. every publicity is good publicity for them. they have enough and want more

"let them date"

there are many cool things to do. this doesn't fall into the category

you're right. all celebrity "dating" or "marriage" news are fake publicity stunts. celebrities "date" or "marry" for attention. and they choose the right time to publicize it

ultra legends wouldn't wish "marriage" on anyone

"dating" is temporary insanity. "marriage" is permanent insanity

i'm starting to get used to his current hairstyle. it makes his hair look 10 times better than it already was

how was it "sexy?" ha na and so moon were beating each other to a pulp. if that's "sexy," hyuk woo and so moon fight scenes were sexy and pil kwang and so moon fight scenes are/will be sexier

so moon's fight scenes have been nothing short of remarkable. he's the leader of the team who can summon/touch the yung territory at will, amplify his strength, manipulate objects/people with his mind, and move faster than speeding bullets. he's a unique counter with unique powers. yung people and his team members rely on him

he didn't show himself in the 1st season. it's been 2 years and he's mastered every aspect of his powers to the fullest. he should be able to show himself now. i'd love to see more of mo tak, ms. chu, mr. choi and ha na, but it's okay that the first episodes are so moon-centered

"the smell is getting closer"
"we are the ones getting closer, you idiot"

the comedy is one of a kind. we bring the popcorn, the uncanny family bring us the laughs

"it might be time for me to step down"

mo tak, you're not a hindrance. when everything went to hell, you stood by so moon, ms. chu, mr. choi and ha na without flinching. you're a freakishly strong member of the uncanny family. they need you

"And what happened to So Moon and Ha Na’s little flirting back in season 1"

i told the "flirting/romance" that it has miles to go before it reaches mediocre, and it ran away (i hope)

"that power of yours, where did you get it from? why use it to protect these useless things?"

pil kwang took an immediate liking to so moon and his powers. he knows so moon is too good for his team/yung people/this world. together, they'd have been unstoppable. i'm sad that i won't get to see so moon join the other team. his contract would be terminated and his powers would be taken away. we know that from season 1

"You're an angry bigot"

you support everyone who isn't an angry, man-hating lesbian? you hate on hatred. you're intolerant of any belief that differs from your own. and that's bigoted. your support for almost-everyone has distorted your judgment

"You speak in huge, sweeping generalizations about huge, sweeping categories of people"

generalizations are necessary and useful. our brains are pattern recognition machines. they are good at using samples and making conclusions about a broader population. i have seen men treating me like shit. i have seen men treating other women like shit. i have seen you, a man, saying not-all-men to deflect attention away from women's experiences. my sample size is large and my generalizations are derived from evidence

you've been putting words in my mouth since we started this conversation. you assumed, 1) i hate myself, 2) i hate all men, 3) i said all women do this or that. i stopped listening about an hour ago. have a nice day/night

you're a (gay) man. you have no concept of a "straight" identifying woman's feelings toward a "straight" identifying man, and you sure seem to think you know what it's all about when you talk about them preferring polygamy or cheating for no reason. you don't. in other words, you have no idea what you're talking about, but you like to talk anyway

"Someone who hates half the population isn't a reliable source of knowledge about the very people they hate"

as if being supportive doesn't make you a biased and unreliable source of knowledge? your humanitarianism is an expression of emotion. "don't hate [insert group]" or "everyone has a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" isn't objective. noone is 100% objective. we aren't robots. we love and hate. there are emotions behind our logics and logics behind our emotions

i know "straight" identifying women who feel the same way i do toward "straight" identifying men. they choose to be single and happy. i know what i'm talking about

"women cheating is the man's fault also, but if a man cheats it's ALSO his fault, right?"

it all goes back to men, how they are horny 24/7 and have commitment issues. they don't commit to one woman. women would cheat, obviously

"Are you a Lesbian?"

yep!

"Yup. My aunt was right: You're a "man-hater." Curious: Are you a Lesbian?"

i don't hate men who leave women alone and build healthy relationships with other men instead. they'd learn to respect women and each other. hitting two targets with one arrow

"As to you hating being a woman...your statements and attitude regarding your womb and your periods indicates that to be the case"

you misunderstood. i said i celebrate my periods and empty womb. being a woman =/= being with a man and getting preggo. i love being a childless woman

a woman reducing herself to a walking womb hates herself. do men understand that? no! see, i don't hate men. men make me hate them

"So you hate straight men. That's a pretty broad category of people to dismiss as worthy of only of your scorn"

every single one of them is worthy of my scorn

"All that considered, it seems your "preferred" monogamous system doesn't really work very well at all"

again, you misunderstood. i said most women flourish in a monogamous relationship. not all women want monogamy. most do

"Who would be relieved not to have to service a horny husband every night"

you're projecting your horniness onto women

"I say this as someone who would never be in a relationship like that"

i'm a monogamous person. i can't relate

"Plenty of women cheat on their husbands too you know"

do your statistics explain why women cheat? women cheat, because the relationship at home is cooling off. they cheat to find out if they are still desirable. the men they are with make them feel inadequate. it's not the monogamous system that doesn't work very well. it's men who don't work very well

"Unless I'm misinterpreting you and you don't mean to be belligerent"

i wasn't trying to sound aggressive

"Men do a LOT of shit. Or have you forgotten society still generally expects the man to be the primary bread-winner"

men do a lot of that shit in a monogamous system. men provide, they bring something to the table, and women agree to raise their children. men wouldn't have done that shit/taken responsibility in a non-monogamous system that lets them "impregnate" one woman a day and get away with it

"Says who?"

me? what do laws have to do with the general disadvantages of polygamy for women? monogamy outweighs polygamy. polygamy is rare and most women prefer monogamy for the reasons explained above. i didn't say all polygamy should be illegal. i said monogamy is preferred, and men should respect that preference

"It sounds like you're angry that you are a woman"

i'm not angry?

"You sound like, as one of my aunts used to say, a man-hater"

i hate most men. you know, the ones who don't leave women alone? i don't hate gay men