Dang. Somun and hana fighting was sexy. So mun has grown up. You can feel that from him. Good acting by him to…
how was it "sexy?" ha na and so moon were beating each other to a pulp. if that's "sexy," hyuk woo and so moon fight scenes were sexy and pil kwang and so moon fight scenes are/will be sexier
so moon's fight scenes have been nothing short of remarkable. he's the leader of the team who can summon/touch the yung territory at will, amplify his strength, manipulate objects/people with his mind, and move faster than speeding bullets. he's a unique counter with unique powers. yung people and his team members rely on him
he didn't show himself in the 1st season. it's been 2 years and he's mastered every aspect of his powers to the fullest. he should be able to show himself now. i'd love to see more of mo tak, ms. chu, mr. choi and ha na, but it's okay that the first episodes are so moon-centered
mo tak, you're not a hindrance. when everything went to hell, you stood by so moon, ms. chu, mr. choi and ha na without flinching. you're a freakishly strong member of the uncanny family. they need you
"that power of yours, where did you get it from? why use it to protect these useless things?"
pil kwang took an immediate liking to so moon and his powers. he knows so moon is too good for his team/yung people/this world. together, they'd have been unstoppable. i'm sad that i won't get to see so moon join the other team. his contract would be terminated and his powers would be taken away. we know that from season 1
Question About the Morning BonerWhat is the biological explanation for the morning boner? Specifically, what happens…
"You're an angry bigot"
you support everyone who isn't an angry, man-hating lesbian? you hate on hatred. you're intolerant of any belief that differs from your own. and that's bigoted. your support for almost-everyone has distorted your judgment
"You speak in huge, sweeping generalizations about huge, sweeping categories of people"
generalizations are necessary and useful. our brains are pattern recognition machines. they are good at using samples and making conclusions about a broader population. i have seen men treating me like shit. i have seen men treating other women like shit. i have seen you, a man, saying not-all-men to deflect attention away from women's experiences. my sample size is large and my generalizations are derived from evidence
you've been putting words in my mouth since we started this conversation. you assumed, 1) i hate myself, 2) i hate all men, 3) i said all women do this or that. i stopped listening about an hour ago. have a nice day/night
Question About the Morning BonerWhat is the biological explanation for the morning boner? Specifically, what happens…
you're a (gay) man. you have no concept of a "straight" identifying woman's feelings toward a "straight" identifying man, and you sure seem to think you know what it's all about when you talk about them preferring polygamy or cheating for no reason. you don't. in other words, you have no idea what you're talking about, but you like to talk anyway
"Someone who hates half the population isn't a reliable source of knowledge about the very people they hate"
as if being supportive doesn't make you a biased and unreliable source of knowledge? your humanitarianism is an expression of emotion. "don't hate [insert group]" or "everyone has a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" isn't objective. noone is 100% objective. we aren't robots. we love and hate. there are emotions behind our logics and logics behind our emotions
i know "straight" identifying women who feel the same way i do toward "straight" identifying men. they choose to be single and happy. i know what i'm talking about
Question About the Morning BonerWhat is the biological explanation for the morning boner? Specifically, what happens…
"women cheating is the man's fault also, but if a man cheats it's ALSO his fault, right?"
it all goes back to men, how they are horny 24/7 and have commitment issues. they don't commit to one woman. women would cheat, obviously
"Are you a Lesbian?"
yep!
"Yup. My aunt was right: You're a "man-hater." Curious: Are you a Lesbian?"
i don't hate men who leave women alone and build healthy relationships with other men instead. they'd learn to respect women and each other. hitting two targets with one arrow
Question About the Morning BonerWhat is the biological explanation for the morning boner? Specifically, what happens…
"As to you hating being a woman...your statements and attitude regarding your womb and your periods indicates that to be the case"
you misunderstood. i said i celebrate my periods and empty womb. being a woman =/= being with a man and getting preggo. i love being a childless woman
a woman reducing herself to a walking womb hates herself. do men understand that? no! see, i don't hate men. men make me hate them
"So you hate straight men. That's a pretty broad category of people to dismiss as worthy of only of your scorn"
every single one of them is worthy of my scorn
"All that considered, it seems your "preferred" monogamous system doesn't really work very well at all"
again, you misunderstood. i said most women flourish in a monogamous relationship. not all women want monogamy. most do
"Who would be relieved not to have to service a horny husband every night"
you're projecting your horniness onto women
"I say this as someone who would never be in a relationship like that"
i'm a monogamous person. i can't relate
"Plenty of women cheat on their husbands too you know"
do your statistics explain why women cheat? women cheat, because the relationship at home is cooling off. they cheat to find out if they are still desirable. the men they are with make them feel inadequate. it's not the monogamous system that doesn't work very well. it's men who don't work very well
Question About the Morning BonerWhat is the biological explanation for the morning boner? Specifically, what happens…
"Unless I'm misinterpreting you and you don't mean to be belligerent"
i wasn't trying to sound aggressive
"Men do a LOT of shit. Or have you forgotten society still generally expects the man to be the primary bread-winner"
men do a lot of that shit in a monogamous system. men provide, they bring something to the table, and women agree to raise their children. men wouldn't have done that shit/taken responsibility in a non-monogamous system that lets them "impregnate" one woman a day and get away with it
"Says who?"
me? what do laws have to do with the general disadvantages of polygamy for women? monogamy outweighs polygamy. polygamy is rare and most women prefer monogamy for the reasons explained above. i didn't say all polygamy should be illegal. i said monogamy is preferred, and men should respect that preference
"It sounds like you're angry that you are a woman"
i'm not angry?
"You sound like, as one of my aunts used to say, a man-hater"
i hate most men. you know, the ones who don't leave women alone? i don't hate gay men
This is ok. And Ki Hyun Woo is beautiful, but for some reason the sexual harassment bothers me more here than…
jun mo (jun) isn't uncomfortable. hyun woo (jun) was his first love. he sniffed the shirt and smiled to himself that he will smell like hyun woo (jun), didn't he? a part of him is interested. it's just that the other part is slow and needs time to make sense of that information. it gives a 404, Not Found error
Question About the Morning BonerWhat is the biological explanation for the morning boner? Specifically, what happens…
"... the idea of one man and one woman committing to a monogamous relationship and having at most one child per year, is entirely an opposite arrangement from what the male body is DESIGNED to do"
monogamy evolved for women and what the female body is "designed" to do: producing one offspring per 9 month period
"pregnancy" is not a joke. it's not easy on the body. we're talking about the stretch marks, untimely morning sickness, and swollen feet and hands. it pushes the body off-limits, much more than any competitive sport
men don't do shit. they "spread their seed." women do the shit. it'd make sense for women to call the shots and ask for a monogamous system that preserves social "order." men can't expect women to give themselves up and carry their offspring to term without giving anything up in return for the time women spend in activities that provide resources for the offspring. it's toxic to take, take, take, and not give. how women resolve this trade-off has long been tied to monogamy and the cooperation of men to help raise dependents. the value of exclusive cooperation/monogamy outweighs polygamy
men don't want this system? that's a reason for them to go their own way, somewhere far from women. women don't want them or their "it's free real estate" system that puts women at a disadvantage
"... straying is exactly what our bodies tell us to do"
people have the power to determine what to do with themselves. nature says to stray. we can say no to that. as a woman, i've never had the urge to be with a man or have children. every menstrual cycle/period has been a middle finger that tells nature to go fuck itself. the womb prepares for implantation of a developing embryo. i don't let a man put an embryo in that womb. i bleed/get my period. nature loses and i win 😈
"... we are by nature ALREADY disgusting sex pigs"
The real scandal is people making a big thing out of two adults dating eachother.
the real scandal is people getting off on two adults "dating." they are adults. it's none of anyone's business what they do, right? there's no reason to be happy
K-Drama 
"dating" is temporary insanity. "marriage" is permanent insanity
he didn't show himself in the 1st season. it's been 2 years and he's mastered every aspect of his powers to the fullest. he should be able to show himself now. i'd love to see more of mo tak, ms. chu, mr. choi and ha na, but it's okay that the first episodes are so moon-centered
"we are the ones getting closer, you idiot"
the comedy is one of a kind. we bring the popcorn, the uncanny family bring us the laughs
mo tak, you're not a hindrance. when everything went to hell, you stood by so moon, ms. chu, mr. choi and ha na without flinching. you're a freakishly strong member of the uncanny family. they need you
i told the "flirting/romance" that it has miles to go before it reaches mediocre, and it ran away (i hope)
pil kwang took an immediate liking to so moon and his powers. he knows so moon is too good for his team/yung people/this world. together, they'd have been unstoppable. i'm sad that i won't get to see so moon join the other team. his contract would be terminated and his powers would be taken away. we know that from season 1
you support everyone who isn't an angry, man-hating lesbian? you hate on hatred. you're intolerant of any belief that differs from your own. and that's bigoted. your support for almost-everyone has distorted your judgment
"You speak in huge, sweeping generalizations about huge, sweeping categories of people"
generalizations are necessary and useful. our brains are pattern recognition machines. they are good at using samples and making conclusions about a broader population. i have seen men treating me like shit. i have seen men treating other women like shit. i have seen you, a man, saying not-all-men to deflect attention away from women's experiences. my sample size is large and my generalizations are derived from evidence
you've been putting words in my mouth since we started this conversation. you assumed, 1) i hate myself, 2) i hate all men, 3) i said all women do this or that. i stopped listening about an hour ago. have a nice day/night
"Someone who hates half the population isn't a reliable source of knowledge about the very people they hate"
as if being supportive doesn't make you a biased and unreliable source of knowledge? your humanitarianism is an expression of emotion. "don't hate [insert group]" or "everyone has a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" isn't objective. noone is 100% objective. we aren't robots. we love and hate. there are emotions behind our logics and logics behind our emotions
i know "straight" identifying women who feel the same way i do toward "straight" identifying men. they choose to be single and happy. i know what i'm talking about
it all goes back to men, how they are horny 24/7 and have commitment issues. they don't commit to one woman. women would cheat, obviously
"Are you a Lesbian?"
yep!
"Yup. My aunt was right: You're a "man-hater." Curious: Are you a Lesbian?"
i don't hate men who leave women alone and build healthy relationships with other men instead. they'd learn to respect women and each other. hitting two targets with one arrow
you misunderstood. i said i celebrate my periods and empty womb. being a woman =/= being with a man and getting preggo. i love being a childless woman
a woman reducing herself to a walking womb hates herself. do men understand that? no! see, i don't hate men. men make me hate them
"So you hate straight men. That's a pretty broad category of people to dismiss as worthy of only of your scorn"
every single one of them is worthy of my scorn
"All that considered, it seems your "preferred" monogamous system doesn't really work very well at all"
again, you misunderstood. i said most women flourish in a monogamous relationship. not all women want monogamy. most do
"Who would be relieved not to have to service a horny husband every night"
you're projecting your horniness onto women
"I say this as someone who would never be in a relationship like that"
i'm a monogamous person. i can't relate
"Plenty of women cheat on their husbands too you know"
do your statistics explain why women cheat? women cheat, because the relationship at home is cooling off. they cheat to find out if they are still desirable. the men they are with make them feel inadequate. it's not the monogamous system that doesn't work very well. it's men who don't work very well
i wasn't trying to sound aggressive
"Men do a LOT of shit. Or have you forgotten society still generally expects the man to be the primary bread-winner"
men do a lot of that shit in a monogamous system. men provide, they bring something to the table, and women agree to raise their children. men wouldn't have done that shit/taken responsibility in a non-monogamous system that lets them "impregnate" one woman a day and get away with it
"Says who?"
me? what do laws have to do with the general disadvantages of polygamy for women? monogamy outweighs polygamy. polygamy is rare and most women prefer monogamy for the reasons explained above. i didn't say all polygamy should be illegal. i said monogamy is preferred, and men should respect that preference
"It sounds like you're angry that you are a woman"
i'm not angry?
"You sound like, as one of my aunts used to say, a man-hater"
i hate most men. you know, the ones who don't leave women alone? i don't hate gay men
monogamy evolved for women and what the female body is "designed" to do: producing one offspring per 9 month period
"pregnancy" is not a joke. it's not easy on the body. we're talking about the stretch marks, untimely morning sickness, and swollen feet and hands. it pushes the body off-limits, much more than any competitive sport
men don't do shit. they "spread their seed." women do the shit. it'd make sense for women to call the shots and ask for a monogamous system that preserves social "order." men can't expect women to give themselves up and carry their offspring to term without giving anything up in return for the time women spend in activities that provide resources for the offspring. it's toxic to take, take, take, and not give. how women resolve this trade-off has long been tied to monogamy and the cooperation of men to help raise dependents. the value of exclusive cooperation/monogamy outweighs polygamy
men don't want this system? that's a reason for them to go their own way, somewhere far from women. women don't want them or their "it's free real estate" system that puts women at a disadvantage
"... straying is exactly what our bodies tell us to do"
people have the power to determine what to do with themselves. nature says to stray. we can say no to that. as a woman, i've never had the urge to be with a man or have children. every menstrual cycle/period has been a middle finger that tells nature to go fuck itself. the womb prepares for implantation of a developing embryo. i don't let a man put an embryo in that womb. i bleed/get my period. nature loses and i win 😈
"... we are by nature ALREADY disgusting sex pigs"
facts
"it's not a scandal/bad thing" is your opinion. you were free to share your opinion. people should be as free to call it a scandal