atom951

I like all sorts, it's only one episode and I wasn't expecting what I saw!

Irony. The female brain is programmed to seek a male that will provide. It's instinct. Call it what you like.

I subscribed to P+ to watch a K-drama, only to find it wasn't available in my region - I quickly got my money back off Amazon. I think they're referring to P+ within Korea. It means there are legal platforms in other countries that will have it, if you know how to travel. That being said, this show's not one that I'd choose to watch, try-hard feminism is as dull as ditch water - K-dramas have an abundance of fantastic female characters and certainly don't need to pander to that political nonsense.

Making no sense never stopped Hollywood. And Hollywood runs K-drama these days, doesn't it?

It's judged as a weekly drama. It was the best weekly drama of that year according to the panel. It's not worth evaluating in retrospect.

Dude, he's already signed up for Taxi Driver 7. And 1958 detective 2,3,4 and 5. Ok, 1959, 1960, 1961 Detective. Or 1957, 1956, 1955, whatever. Who cares?

A writer on the decline always regurgitates their former glory - the hand clawing at a tree root on the tumble down the mountain. Yes, she's still tumbling down Mount Jiri.

They ruined the end of Move to Heaven for no reason. They ruined the end of Attorney Woo for no reason. Unless you think the 'ideas' of Hollywood execs constitute good reasons. Anyway, the kick boxer who cleans up after the dead got cancelled by the kick boxer who drives a taxi.

I never watched Signal because I'd already seen Frequency, both the movie and TV show, I had no feeling. It would be extremely lazy to make Signal 2. The original cast will do well to avoid. The death knell on K-dramas is looming if it goes ahead.

They'll keep doing that as long as the audience invests in the idea of seasons. I realised a while ago that I was being played and stopped watching them. It's not a loss, seasonal, episodic drama is fodder. We, the audience, are the cows munching it. I'm openly critical these days, the expected bots and cheerleaders, and even a few real people get unnecessarily excited (conned) over lazy ideas dragged on and on - we wait years for an ever-diminishing payload that was just a pile of horseshit to begin with.

Agree, they make it into an honourable lie that gets on the nerves of the audience for the majority of episodes. Rage-baiting, artificial tension, usually occurs in weaker scripts where characters are a bit hollow and interactions aren't engaging.

If she got detained for questioning a second time, her show was in jeopardy

His cameo in Death's Game knocked me out. Ep. 2, guess you watched already.

It gets better, I remember thinking the same thing at the start, it was scary - she's playing a slightly younger character and just overdid it. I'm a fan, so didn't comment on it. I guess the director or her family also noticed. I'm not a fan of Botox (esp. clumsy and unskilled as in this case) or any other surgery, it's never more beautiful than the natural face - probably because it opens a window to a fragility in the mind which is frightening.

Let's not go into it then.

That's only in episode 1

That's not the correct use of the word magnanimous, but I get your drift. A magnanimous party is in the higher position yet shows generosity. None of the commentators here are in a higher position than Yoo Ah-in... Or is it that their fake virtue-signalling kindness comes from their twisted narcissism... they think they're better than him? News flash - they're not, you're not, I'm not. All I'm doing is voicing my disgust at leniency towards drug offences. I don't believe it's the right approach. It's a 'sweep the dirt under the carpet' approach.

Sure, I liked her in Aloha State, albeit the worst of the Terrace House seasons. My point isn't her looks being bad, just that she's not in his league.

What is better? Learn to write complete sentences.

Everyone on the planet has 'stuff to deal with', you're not special.