Badass Bunny

Because I am not a newbie watcher that just saw their first TV series.
That's how I can judge after first episode and proudly say that there was close to 0 percent of plot.

If you like it, that is amazing. Keep watching and enjoy yourself, but please don't pick on other people.

There is close to 0 plot.
The acting is mediocre.
The sex scenes....too many of them, cringe worthy and just oh god that is not how a blow job looks...

Gonna stick around for sure, but I will mostly skip.
So it won't be proper watching.

*pats u on the back* gwaenchana, gwaenchana

I am curious about how will they solve the case with ''borrowing'' of the car.
Car borrowing does not happen in real life so that's minus point from the start.

Yeah, I am dropping this.
The acting is very mediocre and I overall feel that they are trying to gain popularity with random sex scenes and nudity. That's not how eroticism looks, this looked cheap. Trust me, I enjoy the beauty of naked bodies and good sex scenes, but they gotta have some meaning behind it, otherwise it can look like softporn.
The plot makes about 10 percent of the episode and the rest is sex. I like when sex happens because of the plot, not the other way around where sex becomes the plot. If I would want that I would go and watch real porn.

I had high expectations because the scriptwriter talked about how he is gonna show some darker and mature topics. I saw none of that. Also Zouey I am still searching for that tear that never made it!

Weird logic of yours.
Don't wanna know further what kind of moral standards you uphold.

Was there any warning about polyamory or will this drama not have it?

If you are only strictly comparing them in sex scenes than yes they might surpass KinnPorsche and others, but I have to say that KinnPorsche's plot did not focus on sex, but mafia, meanwhile Playboyy's plot is about sex and it will be very difficult for them to get my heart with this, because I do not like sex based stories.

I suggest you to look up a real life mass rape scandal that took place in S.Korea and than repeat your words. A little spoiler for the said case: all rapists were released, never jailed and got their identities changed.

Is it really though?
Some of them should have gotten a death penalty, but they were released. Than Ji Yong killed them so is he really covering crime with another crime? This topic is very debatable.

Not gonna lie, when I was in S.Korea my butt clenched every time I saw a white truck on the road LOL

I am pleasantly surprised as well that the historical parts make a big chunk of the whole series! :)

I think they revealed his true character quite fast, but on the other hand, I hate stalling in series, so them just being straightforward was kinda a nice surprise? No weeks of contemplating who is the copycat.

Not gonna lie the most exciting parts of each episode is the historical part >.<
I am such a sucker for historical dramasssss and hate-to-love tropes!

I know, I didn't wanna type that original reply in past tense, because it would kinda spoil that he is not :)

Wow, I am so excited to see this! So Kang Ok operated also under the pseudo "Vigilante"?

My same thoughts.

OMG thanks so much for the spoilersssss <3

I am happy that he has so many people on his side! The detective being on his side is most shocking part, honestly. And Kang Ok...Would you say he is bad obsessed or good obsessed? Will he be a good Watson to the Sherlock or nah? I honestly feel that there are too many dramas where the main hero is all alone and rejects any side-kicks or even if they get a side-kick in the end the side-kick will betray the hero. Will this be a stable partnership?

I never said that he was killing as a form of self defense. I was just contemplating that there are many forms of homicides and not all homicides are treated the same way in front of law. Only a skilled lawyer here could tell you what degree of killing is main lead doing and what form it is and possible punishment and even than, law differs from country to another.

In the end my original statement says that it is hard to say that killing is the worst of evil, because there are many forms of it. Only law can and should weight the evil created by humans.

And the debate about death penalties has been around for decades. No one can say if it is right or wrong. Never in my comments here to you I have been trying to change your opinion, because I myself am not skilled enough in law. I just humbly know that there are many types of homicides and not all are treated the same way.