Badass Bunny

Sorry, but if u have this attitude towards sex, maybe this isnt for you. This drama is made for those, who do not mind sex or pornography, so yeah.

For now, no. Only intensive kissing. For real the most explicit thing is indeed the book hahaha. But this drama looks heavy sex based. It talks about the issues of it and so on. It is a fusion drama, so this cant be considered like a real sageuk.

This drama is far more explicit than Queen Who Crowns. In the paintings u can see things like fingering, without ANY censoring lol. Here it isnt only boob showing.

My jaw is still dropped :D The book is indeed a well done pornography book! First time a rating is truly appropriate!!!

Okay, I might be the minority here, but I did not like the sex scene in terms of Asahi's acting. Like, he appeared so...emotionless? It looked like only one party enjoyed the boom bang lol.

Why GMMTV deleted episodes 1-5 from Youtube...

She responded that she ain't publishing your articles, so we have 2 options. Either she is lying, or someone else is publishing them, which IS confusing, since editors claim to not have power in publishing articles. So....maybe a ghost!

You find this distasteful, but not a fact that the writer has bypassed other writers and changed her article section to get published upfront?

Now, your comment is distasteful.

Drama Recap is an editorial as well.
Also, there are at least 4 drama recaps written before your drama recaps.
Talking with editors is of no use, since they aren't in charge of publishing your articles, but maybe contact Lily Alice, who does publish your articles.
I have contacted her as well in terms of this matter, because having your articles published up front + you changing article sections to get published first is a nonsense.

Also, stop, editing your comments, it makes me reply twice.
''Call you names simply because you wanted to write other subjects?''

Sorry, but are you okay?
You ARE writing editorials and putting them in news section, to get published! You aren't writing a new subject - you aren't writing news! You are still writing editorials, so quit lying.

Also, I ain't a poet, but please, reply to me with some structure and grammar, because decoding your sentences should be awarded.

You are trying very hard to make a victim out of yourself, but simple facts ruin your efforts.

Did you change the section of your articles to get published fast? YES

Did you bypass others and get published before others? YES

You claiming how you got your writer role is absolutely useless and has 0 things to do with your attitude towards this whole situation. By statistics, I and many others should get the writer role as well, but we have given up on that.

You didn't come up with a single valid reason for your actions.

You are aware of your machinations and will continue to do them.

Also, shall I get into statistics as well and tell you how many articles I have in queue? It's more than 20; I can tell you that.

You should be absolutely ashamed to even bring up your ''ideas'' when people like me and others have been active far longer than you and are awaiting publication for what…years? How many articles have you got published under the pretense of ''news'' in 2025? Because I and others got 0.

So, quit acting like a victim and own up to your attitude and actions.

Yes, other writers can't change the category of their articles.
What u have done is also a good chess move, because no matter how hard you try to argue, that article of yours was indeed an editorial and not a news article. You by-passed others, and for that, you got minus points. You yourself even answered a comment that questioned the section the article was in. Your response? That you know that others are waiting for their articles to be published, so you didn't wanna be in a queve. Ehm, by creating a shortcut? That was pure evil, okay? You tried to look considerate of us, but anyone can see how evil that move was from miles away.

In terms of publishing dates, you are right, it is MDL who is in charge and not you. It is probably Alice again, as she is the chief of writers. BUT that doesn't take away the fact, that you skipped the line even in this drama recap section. Now, what I would do in your place? Since I do have a backbone, I would contact either Alice, or admin to take down the article. Reason? Others were in front of you.

You know these facts very well, but choose to act innocently, while happily digesting the benefits of having a ''writer'' role. And u know what I don't like other than unfairness? Pretense.

It has nothing to do with your writing style.
You are a perfect example that users with certain roles have an advantage and are treated differently.
I can't change my article section, like you, in order to get published up front.
Fairness is long gone, and it makes me sick to my stomach, because the queve for the articles is long as a Nile river, but than comes users with certain roles and get their stuff published daily.
How is this fair and how come people aren't ashamed?
When MDL was in drought and I have written 20+ articles, I always said to my editors that if someone new pops up with an article idea to put them in front of me due to the quantity of my articles, and I felt super weirded out, so I always pushed others up front, but the head writer and other writers have really no backbone. They are very much aware how long is the queve, but ignore it on purpose. So once again, it isn't your writing style, but MDL being MDL.

And I know that it's only me writing here, but trust me, all the writers must feel the same way when they see this happening. Why are we treated like this? Why others have privilages? Why are our articles treated as shit?

First an editorial turned to a news article, and now a drama recap published first rather than articles that have been sitting in the queve for years....

Is MDL trying to tell us something again?

Ah, thankfully I am bi so I got no problem hahaha.

Yeah, I have been in this rodeo since like 2005 so I turned to a grumpy old hag LOL :D

7.3 is way too high, in my opinion.

And might I add, the fields mentioned here are basic GS, and ortho, with one minor neurosurgery. The surgeries look "huge", but they indeed fall under trauma.

That is a very easy question, yes I have. I dont know what kind of doctors u work with, but our trauma professors have high knowledge. What u can see in the series is sorry but basic knowledge a trauma surgeon needs to have. Abdomen? Check. Head injuries? Check. Ortho? Check. This is what trauma field is - u dont know what trauma comes in so u gotta know a lot from other fields as well. If other fields come in, that is amazing, but unrealistic. I encounter few cases when doctor requested a speciality doctor, usually trauma doctors handle a lot of cases alone. Why is that? Because of lack of time. Trauma is trauma for a reason.

U dont need to promise me anything, I am a nurse :) I have firsthand experience with trauma department.