Ether

Probably "Marry me"? Or "I love you"

Ohh so they are possibly teasing for the adaptation of his novel

So... Who is Frost Patheera?

Yes, and so many things just didn't make sense or were glossed over...
When the rest of the drama was so good :'(

The movie was perfect, but I still wanted to see Rokkaku's reaction when he learned they were together :D

How to summarize the ending? Loopholes, loopholes everywhere...
That was so disappointing!

I feel that when she said he's like family, she meant like "husband", meaning he's part of her family already. I think she really liked him romantically, but it is also true she still has unresolved feelings for Sou, so the relationship cannot continue. I think she took her decision when she realised Minato didn't know she loved him (the scene with the teacher, where she looked really hurt).
As the mother said: 'it's a problem when it's no one's fault". Was it Minato's insecurities? Tsumugi's 'lack' of love? Sou's reappearance in their lifes?

It shows the complexity of human emotions: in the end, there is no reasoning.

It's filmed really weirdly. The point of the height difference is to be cute, so why is there almost no full body shot? For the princess-style carrying scenes, the point is the size difference between the two characters, so why don't they take a full body shot?

I need someone that read the novel to spoil me about the ending, I refuse to be broken by a tragically sad ending.

You guys are so right, I forgot about the Shaman freaking out! I assumed SJ saved Yoon Jae, hence his fear of dogs (that would explain the kid calling him Yoon Jae in the park, it was probably Yoon Jae himself)

I really don't like what they did with the amnesia thingy. BOTH SJ AND In Seong: "I lost all my memory as a child because of an accident".
Traumatic amnesia would have made so much more sense, for the both of them. In Seong because of the abuse he suffered in the HWC , and SJ because he met a fkn CHILD in a cage when he was young.

And why are none of the characters thinking that maybe In Seong (lost child of the canteen lady) and In Seong (Creepy juror) are the same person?

I still feel like prof Chadok is just as pressured as Akk, and isn't really okay with everything that's happening. He probably doesn't have anything to do with prof Dika's death either.
I feel like his character is just there to show us what Akk would become if Aye wasn't by his side.

When she was calling RSH, it was 3 hours before, if I remember correctly.

I still think it's just In Sung/Charles/EunKi, because the woman with chapstick could very well be EunKi, she has medical knowledge from her mother, she told RSJ in episode 5 or 6. She also had the number 13 in the juror selection (Charles was number 24).

Yes but how are we supposed to support the SML then? And his manager is clearly homophobic, with no message behind it.

This show has such a contradictory message. On one hand, you have the character of Gwang Nam who's suffering from homophobia and family expectation. On the other hand, you have characters saying "better to be in a love scandal than be gay", "Maybe people will think I'm gay too if I'm associated with you", "I hate that people think I'm gay". WTF

I'm so confused, we didn't get an explanation as to why Su Cheol had Geu Ru's business card? And who wrote on it and why? Or did I miss something?
Also, why does Sang Gu keep saying that the mafia Madam "set them up" him and Su Cheol? It's not her fault he killed the kid.

Could someone explain the original title of this drama ? "Red moon, blue sun", I know it comes from the children book referenced in the drama, but I don't understand what it means.

The college students are Xu Qi's ex-classmates, so Ah Jian is probably 18 too. Both Ye Guang and Ray should be 17.

Wow it's the first time I heard of this! That's China for you, crazy...