all this talk about love and we didn't get at least a hint ... a hint man, i didn't want much ... a hint to show a bit of flirt.
ML : Well I think love is.....
.... always a different experience and what you've known about it ends when you start again. FL: Will you tell me when you find a new answer then? ML: I think I might. *smile* *smile* FL: Soo... the food was great. ML: It was. FL: Would you.. ML: I would. FL: ... join me sometime again? ML: I thought you meant now. FL: I am not that eager. ML: .... FL: OK, yes I meant now.
That was all, no kiss no hug, i did not need that but they made it all like big talk about love and yet none for them. He seemed kind of accepting of the fact that it's not a good idea and she looked like: oh well, i get it, ok, at least i learned something.
I need no steamy kiss it was clear from episode 1 we ain't getting that but MAN... let the man finish and give me a hint that he is at least considering her.
Cases were good, still liked the drama, not many rushed things but... *sigh* .... god damn it.
- so this was a legal case? like ... in court? ... so if I was bullied by other kids in high school is it normal…
I agree that the first is attempted murder (you may argue the intention, which you typically do in these cases) but you may prove the aggressor has accepted the outcome, even though it was not the main purpose, when the hit is in a vital area (like head or heart). So "I did not want to kill the person" is irrelevant when you throw a knife to the heart and somehow the person lives. Yes, the first one should have been attempted murder.
The disruption of events is correct, but the prosecutor should have argued that "yes, she often crosses the street illegally but given the stare she was put in by the aggressor, her chances to avoid the collision were dramatically reduced, therefore you cannot say i hit this person with my car because she took a blow to the head and probably did not see the car come. Yes she often drinks and often crosses the street illegally but the result, that evening, was of direct contribution of the aggressor. "
the reality of it is that you can use the law to help both innocent and not so innocent people, that is where the lack of feeling in the law stands. It's people who bring life to law, law is just a means.. and can be used by smart people to either help the good or the bad. No one there committed any crime in the way the law was used to defend the doctor.
There's good chemistry between them that can be read as romantic and their loves live (separate of each other)…
I gave up but I love their dynamic. Second couple is a bit more direct and I like those too, it looks natural. Now, if we don't get anything at least it was a decent ship. I see her admiration and interest and a bit of surprise towards him when feeling a bitt too interested and on his side I see a bit of calm setting in and sort of noticing her a little but again just in admiration... romance tho? kinda zero chances. I feel in the end we will get the picture of them looking at each other and smiling and sort of giving us a hint that they might be more in the future but no, people need to accept we won't get anything.
THO man the scene in the rain looking at each other ... i really though it was something there
Ep 7 went out of track, I wanted interesting cases which puts them in a dilemma not some internal politics which…
i agree.. plus i feel a lot of plots kind of just mentioned and i think they won't have time to wrap it up and the last ep will be rushed.. as usual when i get my hopes up for a drama :(
Ridiculous! Directors are under no obligation to give you what you want. You are reading way too much into this,…
she said it from the first episode "can a man smell so good?" ... she's flirty we can see it :)) i have complimented people too, i don't live in a cave but i know flirt when i see it. She even woke up and though it is inappropriate she knows what she thought :))))
ML : Well I think love is.....
.... always a different experience and what you've known about it ends when you start again.
FL: Will you tell me when you find a new answer then?
ML: I think I might.
*smile*
*smile*
FL: Soo... the food was great.
ML: It was.
FL: Would you..
ML: I would.
FL: ... join me sometime again?
ML: I thought you meant now.
FL: I am not that eager.
ML: ....
FL: OK, yes I meant now.
That was all, no kiss no hug, i did not need that but they made it all like big talk about love and yet none for them. He seemed kind of accepting of the fact that it's not a good idea and she looked like: oh well, i get it, ok, at least i learned something.
I need no steamy kiss it was clear from episode 1 we ain't getting that but MAN... let the man finish and give me a hint that he is at least considering her.
Cases were good, still liked the drama, not many rushed things but... *sigh* .... god damn it.
btw, i thought ML can't drive a car
The disruption of events is correct, but the prosecutor should have argued that "yes, she often crosses the street illegally but given the stare she was put in by the aggressor, her chances to avoid the collision were dramatically reduced, therefore you cannot say i hit this person with my car because she took a blow to the head and probably did not see the car come. Yes she often drinks and often crosses the street illegally but the result, that evening, was of direct contribution of the aggressor. "
The sentence itself was too light.
THO man the scene in the rain looking at each other ... i really though it was something there
Also yeah, sort of the same age gap :)) but main leads ? noooo we cant have that )))