portia7mcg

Sources like X, Facebook, YouTube, and even MDL often embellish information to capture readers' attention without concern for the actual facts. As a reader, you need to distinguish fact from fiction. Don't believe everything you read or, with the advent of AI, see.

What source are you referring to? YouTube? Reddit? Or some unreliable online source? It sounds like it's not credible and just fuelling rumours.

It was such an incredible story, and I loved it. However, I do agree that the ending was rushed

Its a pretty funny, irrelevant post, don't you think?

The series is all about how the Korean mainstream education and after-school education systems seem to have a power struggle. Instead of it being beneficial, the educators, with their egos and manipulative tactics, are in the background. The amount of pressure on these kids is immense; if it is not from the educators, it is from the parents.

It would be awkward, wouldn't it? They are crossing barriers. They previously had a student-teacher relationship, and now their dynamic has shifted in a way that could be seen as inappropriate or unprofessional, given their past roles.

Prequels have a propensity to do that. For example the English show Endevour is the prequel to Morse. Morse (detective chief inspector Morse) is the show which started in the late 1980s to 2000. Its prequel Endevour is set in the mid 1960s to the early 70s.
So you can see that there would be similarities to other dramas.
I hope you’re enjoying the show and if you get a chance watch Endevour and Morse.

Starts in 1958, then the timeline moves to the early 1960s

Not in the terms of academics, but it’s the viewers vote.

But it’s still a stat

Awww, what a nice ending. I also love 10cm's song, Spring snow. It is such a beautiful song.

Phew! I'm watching the last episodes tonight.

Thank you. Sadly it’s late on my side of the world . I’ll watch it tomorrow with subs. Enjoy the show. 😍

What’s that?

Some of these time-shifting dramas work better with fewer episodes. If they become a big hit, they can then add a second series.

that's it, no hope for anyone over 50

I'll have to research the porcelain marks. They must be highly collectable.

lol

Hmm, when she went to the school to speak with the teacher, I thought it was initially more about discussing the situation. She was rational, acknowledging the possibility that a question could have similarly correct answers. However, the teacher stonewalled her and was defiant, likely upset by being challenged as a teacher. This article sensationalises the event by reporting that she "demanded a re-examination".

I think @Mazee01 has answered your question brilliantly.