That sounds like a drinking game 🤔Every death of a main actor, take a shot!🍶🍷🍸🍹🍺
Inconceivable!
Vizzini: Ha-ha, you fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous of which is “Never get involved in a land war in Asia,” but only slightly less well known is this: “Never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line!” The Princess Bride (1987)
Having flashbacks "mistakes" from over drinking is the norm in South Korea dramas.
I used to love mentalist, before it got too long and started to get worse and worse each season.I also like LSY…
Studio's are famous for producing too many sequels, seasons chasing the eyeballs. Many successful franchises ran too long. It's why gamblers can't stop after the big payout.
This has revenge, time travel without returning to the Joseon era. https://kisskh.at/755509-perfect-marriage-revenge
I'm going to wait until it's nearly finished, but the synopsis looks promising. Over use of flash backs, non linear story telling can negatively impact your enjoyment. Not everyone is a fan of puzzles with more than twenty pieces.
This is literally the plot of Hometown-cha-cha-cha 😂 but im not complaining, can't wait!
Read the synopsis again ML doesn't have trauma for killing his friend (car accident). Security guard financial ruin, returning to his small town. ML isn't a jack of all trades doing everything for minimum wage. He's an abrasive character, unlike the other ML. Both leads were child hood friends
Did you fall on your head?Read the Tags: Historical, Comedy, RomanceThat pulled up 346 on MDL.https://kisskh.at/search?adv=titles&ty=68&ge=17,10,19&so=popular
"Politics in the rom-com is the worst formula for this drama."
We're in 4/16 or 25% of this drama!
Your statement is nonsensical at this point, wait until you watch +51%
I've watched hundred dramas, movies with historical, romantic, comedy tags. It's too early to weigh in about politics being too dominant in the story at this point.
Same director, I'm currently watching this, tags include Political, romance, comedy, drama 50% done, enjoyable to watch (for me). https://kisskh.at/55675-the-ballot
Have you ever considered being silent from spreading your negative feelings?Do you need attention?These are fan…
Review the thread and ask your Troll army if they share the same view.
Are these fan pages of the drama, actors? Yes
You don't care about your disruptive behavior (don't use spoiler tags). My assessment is valid based upon your posts and meets the literal definition of trolling.
Have you ever considered being silent from spreading your negative feelings?Do you need attention?These are fan…
Another misfit that rides the short bus weighs in to add nothing.
A review based upon less than 20% of a series is ludicrous, the original post had zero rationale and was edited afterwards.
Objectivity can be viewed as positive, negative or neutral, it's keeping an open mind and listening to the facts.
Reviews are done after the person watches the entire film, series?
The disclaimer is to warn the readers you've only seen a portion of the work, including your biases why your liked, disliked it.
"I don't recommend the chicken soup at ABC restaurant because it didn't look appetizing but I didn't taste it. " (Context)
Are these considered fan pages for the series, actors? If yes, you would see a pattern of those excited and hopeful because of the genre, actors and they hope it will be a good watch.
If you can't see that, its your cognitive and socials skills that are impaired.
My assertion remains its simply rude behaviour to post on fan pages at the beginning to dissuade others of your negative opinions without context, disclaimers.
The spoilers tag is added because it was a conversation between us, your curiosity forced you to click it?
Narcissism is correct description if you thing your opinion is material to others after watching less than 20%. (Review the definition of narcissistic behaviour).
Are you an acclaimed critic, producer that has watched the full series? (NO)
Viewership metrics will judge it popularity, success.
Vizzini: Ha-ha, you fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous of which is “Never get involved in a land war in Asia,” but only slightly less well known is this: “Never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line!”
The Princess Bride (1987)
Having flashbacks "mistakes" from over drinking is the norm in South Korea dramas.
Scenes containing emergencies, violence are very problematic (realism) in most K dramas.
Many successful franchises ran too long.
It's why gamblers can't stop after the big payout.
Every death of a main actor, take a shot!
🍶🍷🍸🍹🍺
How did the possessed actor drive away with the smashed windshield? 🙈
Over use of flash backs, non linear story telling can negatively impact your enjoyment.
Not everyone is a fan of puzzles with more than twenty pieces.
https://kisskh.at/755509-perfect-marriage-revenge
It's the same usual cast of characters who suffer from low self esteem and post online.
Use a search engine for the disorder online Trolls exhibit.
Enjoy the show, ignoring or mocking them is fair game.
ML chasing FL at Shrine
FL touches ML in pit ?
Eun Wol's spirit is also communicating to the leads.
ML doesn't have trauma for killing his friend (car accident). Security guard financial ruin, returning to his small town.
ML isn't a jack of all trades doing everything for minimum wage. He's an abrasive character, unlike the other ML.
Both leads were child hood friends
We're in 4/16 or 25% of this drama!
Your statement is nonsensical at this point, wait until you watch +51%
I've watched hundred dramas, movies with historical, romantic, comedy tags. It's too early to weigh in about politics being too dominant in the story at this point.
Same director, I'm currently watching this, tags include Political, romance, comedy, drama
50% done, enjoyable to watch (for me).
https://kisskh.at/55675-the-ballot
Read the Tags: Historical, Comedy, Romance
That pulled up 346 on MDL.
https://kisskh.at/search?adv=titles&ty=68&ge=17,10,19&so=popular
Are these fan pages of the drama, actors?
Yes
You don't care about your disruptive behavior (don't use spoiler tags). My assessment is valid based upon your posts and meets the literal definition of trolling.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists
Most people view MDL's site for fans of film, drama.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists
Your inability to accept this Hub are fan pages is clear as is your low self esteem.
Strong people don't post negative feedback, the weak minded do. You're not being paid for your comments, reviews and it's voluntary.
"It sucks, lazy writing, no plot before completing it, providing a coherent rationale"
You will continue to Troll on sites because it's your disorder.
A review based upon less than 20% of a series is ludicrous, the original post had zero rationale and was edited afterwards.
Objectivity can be viewed as positive, negative or neutral, it's keeping an open mind and listening to the facts.
Reviews are done after the person watches the entire film, series?
The disclaimer is to warn the readers you've only seen a portion of the work, including your biases why your liked, disliked it.
"I don't recommend the chicken soup at ABC restaurant because it didn't look appetizing but I didn't taste it. " (Context)
Are these considered fan pages for the series, actors? If yes, you would see a pattern of those excited and hopeful because of the genre, actors and they hope it will be a good watch.
If you can't see that, its your cognitive and socials skills that are impaired.
My assertion remains its simply rude behaviour to post on fan pages at the beginning to dissuade others of your negative opinions without context, disclaimers.
The spoilers tag is added because it was a conversation between us, your curiosity forced you to click it?
Narcissism is correct description if you thing your opinion is material to others after watching less than 20%. (Review the definition of narcissistic behaviour).
Are you an acclaimed critic, producer that has watched the full series? (NO)
Viewership metrics will judge it popularity, success.
I don't have any opinion after watching 18.75% 3/16 Episodes.
There's no need to share a negative message at the beginning, dissuade others.
Fortune telling isn't a rationale either.
Your personal decision, opinions remain irrelevant to the majority who haven't watched it.
If had an advanced screening and provided a cogent argument it would be beneficial.
Premature negativism isn't a cogent argument.