TeleriFerchNyfain

??? Why are people hating on that young prosecutor? Makes no sense. He's got a lot of reasons to hate on the forensic guy - he doesn't know the whole story. For him, this doctor is the one that caused his brother to kill himself. Far as he can tell, the forensic doctor did cause the accident that killed the cheating GF. Even our forensic doctor doesn't really remember the actual accident.
Good heavens, people. All 3 of the main characters yell & scream wayyyyy too much. I really am about over ALL of them to tell the truth. NONE of them are all that great at their jobs - the forensic guy does manage his part but good lord he's just the medical examiner, not a detective. Just frustrating.
My fav part is our cute detective, the poison girl and the assistant forensic guy - totally cute interplay there.

What cheating? You mean that cheating female that's just a bit part? Good grief. Minor plot points. The main couple are originally paired with lousy partners and lose them right away.

Here's the thing - this child was left up on the roof by a gang of bullies who basically caused him to jump - that's technically suicide but guess what? Those horrendous brats are completely responsible for the death - morally for sure. Good grief.
This show continues to totally annoy me. Not really sure I can stomach finishing it.

So far, NONE of the shows adapted from Western ones show up on the legal sites :( I have had to watch Criminal Minds, Suits & now this one on those pirate stations. I'm thinking it was the same for The Good Wife as well :(

I've seen Life on Mars - the British version - which is one of my favorite shows. This version is so far following the original fairly close, but with tweaks to make it Korean. I'm loving it so far :D

I will say that I wish it had gone in another direction - but I will continue watching cause Rain - I even finished that lackluster bore fest My Lovely Girl because of him (& L too LOL)

NOTHING really has anything totally new. Just new to some people, or a unique viewpoint. It takes a while to figure this out, of course

Seeing that mother & child killed before his eyes because he didn't kill that drunk driver had a LOT to do with it. All tho I agree that the set-up for killing the innocent prosecutor left much to be desired (writer fail), his willingness to do so in order to save many more lives makes sense. Also his keeping his promise to that prosecutor (that hers would be the LAST innocent life he takes) by not killing her fiance also makes sense.

So I'm completely loving this so far - very snarky LOL

What the actual #^$^ ? Every week they manage to scream even more irritatingly about stupidities.
For crying out loud, the family gets to view and id the body before an autopsy. Really.
I like the mysteries but OMG the stupidity - not sure I'll manage to finish.

She had NO idea if she'd have got the money, tho, and she had no intention of taking that chance. I certainly would have done exactly the same thing.
But I do agree that it was done more as a plot point that anything else.

She didn't know him from squat and she truly loved her horse & was desperate. I don't blame her one iota for lying to a loan shark LOL

Possibly between the two prosecutors...

There's 'unrealistic' as in chaebols don't grow on trees, or fantasy as in body-switching, but that's obviously NOT what sunflower63 means here. She's referring to the failure of the writers to sustain the suspension of disbelief vital to keeping an audience invested in a drama - the way the character of the cook was manipulated by the writer after episode 12 ran counter to how he had been portrayed up until then and thus the necessary willingness of the audience to accept the universe of this drama became very shaky. THAT'S what she meant.

I've watched all Kai's parts LOL That dance was perfection, can I just say!

You know, a guy dies in an airport medical center they are IMMEDIATELY going to take precautions - sheesh.

I'm very able to understand English, thank you, which means I'm perfectly competent at recognizing failed attempts at condescension.
Anyone posting an opinion on a public forum has immediately left themselves open to being called out to defend said opinion. Those who do so in a competent fashion on this site tend to find themselves being called out for attacking others' free speech, or all the other items you have just thrown at my head (or at catzzz123456's). That poster doesn't seem to have English as his first language nor to be expressing himself quite as clearly as he'd like, so I thought mayhaps I should step in, as I'm perfectly able to do both of those things.
You are correct - you haven't the time to adequately deal with me on a fair footing. I do not criticize people except as far as their opinions and their expression of said opinions. I'm aware that being able to effectively shut down those who can't defend their own opinions using textual references does indeed infuriate many posters, but that's life in the fast lane.
I'm not going to attack those honest types who say they don't like something out of personal prejudice, BTW - that's an honest statement. We all have preferences.
I just refuse to let people get away with passing judgement on dramas, actors, writing, as if it's a fact, or an opinion based on fact, when in truth it is just a preference based on the viewer's own likes & dislikes.
I don't believe you understand the first thing about what I'm talking about here, of course. Perhaps when I tell you I never state an opinion I can't back up, unless I state up front it's just my personal prejudice (meaning I can indeed write a thesis so to speak on why I like or dislike many of these dramas) that might help you to understand.

Problem is, comments like 'so predictable, typical, boring, hate this drama' are NOT "critical/ over analytical " at all. They are blanket statements with nothing to explain where this opinion is coming from - ie no reference to the drama itself. LAZY and totally unhelpful for anyone trying to figure out whether to watch said drama, in other words.
Your insulting insinuation that catzzz123456 is somehow just a fangirl actually is far more demeaning and ridiculous than anything he said. Please point out, using textual references, what makes YOU think catzzz123456 is somehow to be trivialized as a fangirl?
You in fact are doing exactly what you are accusing him of - you are assuming you know his motivations with nothing overt to support that, and trying to both edit and censor his comments based on this faulty conclusion.
Nothing you've written leads me to believe you enjoy "a range of different opinions, ideas, and debate about the qualities of a drama". In fact you seem pretty reactionary.

So why are YOU insulting catzz123456 opinion then? I totally get what's being said here.

Oh, sweetie, you obviously have very little reading comprehension to think that.
The immature person would be the one who just offers up vague insults instead of engaging in an actual debate.
Mature people tend to address points brought up and counter them with their own perspectives.
You of course cannot do that effectively.