TheStarsOfTheLion

My take in this is that: Palana used to say that because they know each other's secret so they wouldn't betray each other; Palana ended up betrayed by Prea and her gang; then Prea was seemingly betrayed by her friends who was the only ones know about her secret so it's like a revenge in karma.

I don't care about the actor you said and haven't bother to read comments about him yet. However, based on the things you said here, I see you're the one that are "unacceptable and getting out of hand".
I would like to use the same things you said to say back at you: You want to admire him and be his fan, then fine, go and admire him, IGNORE what others say and let them express their own view on the actor in peace.
No one stop you from having your own opinion on him and express it, and you also have no right to stop others doing the same. From your complaints, it seem your problem with some people here is because of their disfavor his acting, then at least they were talking about something relating to the purpose of this page: quality of a drama/series/film. Unlike yours which is just an attack on people and their speaking right. This is not his fan page; you're in wrong place if you want to see only positive talk about him.
Not only that, what's the meaning of this "Remember well he is not alone and what goes around eventually comes around"? Are you threatening people?
Such a tantrum from a spoiled kid.

P.S. Frankly speaking, after watching Ohm both in this series and Until We Meet Again, I'm not impressed with his acting.

I have heard of Darth Vader. Star War, isn't it. But I haven't watched it yet, so I can't say anything about him.
"We don't need to "call out" characters' behavior as if ours is perfect. It's a little insulting, as if the rest of us can't tell right from wrong." - While I agree with most of your post, I think that you're being too optimistic with that part here. I believe that many people can tell right from wrong, but not all are; otherwise we wouldn't have wife-beaters, mothers-know-best, racist slurs, you-say-no-but-your-body-say-yes rapists and many others. Maybe they can't tell, or maybe they can but they need someone to point it out to bring it to their attention. It happens.

Not "unacceptable", but wrong behaviors need to be called out. Simple as that.

I'm not familiar with those characters you mention, except Severus Snape. And in Severus Snape's case, while he had some redeemable actions, he still need to be criticized for his jealousy, his bias, his past terrorism actions (he wanted to protect Lily but he helping Voldemort might had a hand in her demise in the first place). There exists some fans who like to romanticize his actions and paint him as a misunderstood loving saint, but I doubt everyone would agree with them (at least I don't).

Back to the topic here, pointing out a character's wrong behaviors doesn't necessary the same as bashing that character, for people are flawed so characters can be flawed. People can still watch the series and come to accept that character somewhat, or even love them after they fix their way; but those behaviors are still needed to be called out and viewed as it is: a problem.
After all, if people didn't complain about "I don't like boy, I only like you", feminine "uke", ridiculous kiss while falling, turning a straight boy gay, etc then the quality of BL series wouldn't have the need to move forward and we wouldn't have things like A Tale Of A Thousand Stars, KinnPorsche or Bad Buddy.

The first part of your comment might make sense. However, the last sentence does not.
Don't use "fiction" as excuse.
It's true that a writing that reflects or mentions problems in real life can have positive effects, as it makes people aware of the problems and move toward fixing them (the cruelty of slavery, the oppression of women in the old era, etc.). However, those problem need to be called out, not to be kept in silence. Don't use "It's Fiction" then turn a blind eye. For sometimes, silence is the same as approval.

However, the film-making crew gains nothing from your watch on dramacool. If you can watch on iQIYI or YT, then I encourage you to watch on those platform.

I know how to ride a motorbike, but I don't know to to change its tires :v
I don't know how to drive a car so I can't say about that; but in real life there are people knowing how to use something even though they don't know about its mechanics.

Regarding "And doesn't know the most famous person on campus, even though EVERYONE else knows EVERYTHING about him", I think his friends were exaggerating. Payu can be famous and well-known, but not every-single-body knows him. In my days of college, I sticked to my own business and my group of friends, didn't bother to care who is the top-scorer or who are the son/daughter of millionaires; I didn't even remember all of the students within my major :p It's not like everybody likes gossiping.

There are still bits and pieces of Phu and Khun's scene while Phu's part in this story seem to have ended long ago. It makes me wonder whether it's just fan-service or Phu still has a role in this whole fiasco.

"i am gonna block you so no need for your replies" - Suit yourself. It would help to show your immaturity.
And it seem you intentionally refuse to understand my example, so I will be more clear so you cannot use "dish and network is not a person" as excuses.
By your logic, if I can't prove that I know how to act and have experience in acting then I cannot say that Jimmy's acting is bad. Then vice versa (ironic isn't it?), the opposite also apply: if you cannot prove that you have experience in acting then you cannot say that Jimmy's acting is good either. Which is what you did. Your very own actions disproved your own logic; you spat on your own words.
Also on same line of your logic, if one isn't a film-maker then they don't have the right to say whether a series is good or not, they cannot give rating. Then why people come here? Why you are here? You shouldn't be here in the first place.

Do you need to know how to cook to say whether a dish is bad or good? Or do you just close eyes and chow down everything people give you even if it's too salty and stink?
Do you need to know how to run cable link to complain about slow network connection? Or do you just shut your mouth and pay your money for crappy network?
Not gonna happen, isn't it? So your argument is very immature and childish.

You would DARE to say that? You can only praise and say good things about the actors/series; if not, you must keep silence and get out!
Ha ha. Just kidding. Many people here (and on social media in general) love their double standard in an immature way.

Back to acting, in Bad Buddy, Jimmy's role is a support role, so the demand on acting isn't high. After the series, he seem to gather some attention and hype, so using him in a main role would gain some good attention for the series (at least one of the reasons I'm interested in Vice Versa was him). With a good script and good directing, his acting can be overlooked, as many of GMMTV series before. Too bad the script is kinda a flop (as of now) so it shows.
However, just cut him some slack as this is only his 2nd works; new actors need to start off somewhere, after all. For example, Ohm's acting is good, I might say, in Bad Buddy and He's Coming To Me, but should you see him in his early works (Make It Right and War of High School), you would feel awkward or be cringed :)

One of the four criteria one has to give when write a review is ACTING, isn't it? And here they talk about acting; it's on point to the purpose of this page. Unlike yours which is just an attack on person.
And why hide your comments in spoiler tags when it's not a spoiler? Afraid of others seeing your inappropriate behaviors or something?
And yes, Jimmy's acting is stiff.

"Also, If it wasn' t for OhmNanon this show wouldn't be even talked so much in the first place." - I would like to contradict that. I actually feel annoyed when they put Ohm and Nanon in the pilot trailer, for I feel that they're milking OhmNannon's hype.
My interest was piqued by the alternative universe concept, hidden identity of the person we know (we can see their outward appearance but they're someone else on the inside), searching for our own destined person.
So far, they didn't make good uses of those elements.

Wee is disgusting indeed, but I think... May deserves that.
Lies. Envious. Two-faced. She's no innocent; she just meet a more skillful player than herself.

You seem to be prejudicial, not the reasonable type. I would stop here too.

Five episodes in.
While it's still good until now, I can't help but get annoyed by ML's mother, irritated even. She keeps pressuring him to get married, if not with FL then must be with someone else, using the respect and love of her son to blackmail. If he takes the marriage before he's ready and it turns out bad, who would take the consequence? The time loss, the career's set back, the emotional damage, the chance for the one he may want to get married to, and the children. Not her, but her son. For the best of their child, they always say, but deep down it's for their selfish need.
Those ridiculous arranged marriage turning happy ending send out bad message, in my opinion.

Coming here to voice their dislike everyday is quite toxic indeed.
However, as I check, the thread creator posted 2 days ago, and her (based on the avatar) closest posts are 4 and 5 days ago to reply, not to create a ranting thread of her own, then her next posts are 15 days ago. A far cry from "everyday". So it is not the case here; thus I find the claim of SenfFak, whom you support, unfounded.

I have a different taste.
The few K-dramas I have watched have too much cliche, overuse cancer and leukemia, and the way people talk seems like they want to bite each other's head off. Even though I do like some of them (High Kick and Witch's Diner for examples), I tend to stay away from K-dramas.
Besides, I like to watch gay or supernatural (magic, superpower, etc.) series, and K-dramas seem to be lacking in those (as of I know). If you know some good K-dramas that are about gay romance or action with supernatural elements, then I'm open to recommendations.

Double standard.
When people deem a series bad right at episode 1 or 2, you guys say "Don't judge too soon! It's still to early!" and "Those who haven't watch all of the series shouldn't have the right to review".
And when people keep watching the series and gave their opinion as the series progress, you guys say "If don't like, just leave" and "Haters".
As long as they are criticism or negative review, they are all invalid in one way or another. Only positive review is allowed, and overhyped reaction is welcome (masterpiece, talented, top notch, wonderful, best).

The actor of Term the lieutenant got chubbier than when he was in Boy For Rent, making him less handsome but more cute. Wanna pinch those cheeks (>.<)
But wait! The actress of Saras who he is hitting on was also the one acted as his soon-to-be-ex-girlfriend in Boy For Rent wasn't it? History repeats itself.