No, it is actually very realistic.Many first-world countries often have issues where couples get married and then…
There's that too. Destination countries ends up carrying the burden if they don't get strict on who can enter, or don't get strict in deportations.
The border system, economic system, and our "national pride" / patriotism / nationalism, are what's causing these inequality, discrimination, desperation, and poverty. It's really sad we can't get over these artificial systems our forefathers created.
GalacticTheory said it was Burmese (Myanmar). Since she's brown, yeah, definitely Asian.
In another thread somewhere, Bangladeshi. Which is also possible since these countries are neighbours and the Burmese language has a wider spread than it's current State borders. (Burmese is also spoken in some parts of Tibet for example.)
did they explain why she married re tard boy in the first place? seems very unrealistic. for citizenship? she…
No, it is actually very realistic.
Many first-world countries often have issues where couples get married and then divorce later. The native gets paid for it.
It is actually no longer easy of couples, where one is Korean, to travel to Korea together. Korean embassies often ask ridiculous proofs to prove they're actually a couple. It doesn't matter if.they have a kid or is married because again, under the right conditions, they can divorce in Korea without the spouse getting deported, even naturalised as a Korean citizen.
The strictness is understandable because there really are bad actors abusing the system.
So, yep, it is realistic. It still is happening to this day and will always happen for as long as there is poverty and borders.
Leave the developed and developing country debate aside for a moment, just go through the epstein files and you…
This.
To summarize what Socialpulse said, not because you're not seeing it in news and social media does it mean it isn't happening.
To Blue_Umbrella: It's no different from Japan. Foreigners worship Japan as if it is a utopia. Foreigners will even defend Japan if people are saying negative things about it—they'll even dismiss a native Japanese, as if they know better than the locals. They look down on their own country to protect themselves worhipping Japan.
But behind all that, there is one major issue that many Japanese are crying out for help—Japanese women's rights. The world is obliviously about it because: 1. Japan is so damn good at hiding the issue, or toning it down 2. Foreigners are worshipping Japan as the perfect country and culture. Thus they deny the negative things because it will destroy that image.
For decades, many mangaka, especially women, are limited to voicing their plea through their works because if they literally voice it, they're systematically cancelled by the patriarchy system. Yes, there have been improvements, but it still is a far cry from being a decent improvement.
Sure, South Korea is this and that. But that's only what we are seeing as foreigners. For one, not every news from S.K. is being translated into English.
I'm from the Philippines, and you'll see a lot of vloggers and bloggers—local and foreigners alike—talk about the Philippines like some paradise. That's only the surface. No one is talking about the ugly parts because you'll either get cancelled or branded as a communist.
I think it is safe to say that every country is like that. We're good at hiding the ugly truth from foreigners.
Look at Australia. Instead of calling out the pathetic incompetence of Australia's intelligence and security networks, they invented a fake news that the Philippines is an IS training ground. That is Australia's way of hiding their pathetic incompetence, use another country as a scapegoat, change narrative. The suspects are Australians and they blame another country. Epicly pathetic and incompetent.
The asylum argument is logically sound and solid but is also equally ridiculous. The Pro Bono team, especially the ex-judge, was correct that they'll lose the trial but win the case.
If they pursued it instead of accepting the deal, they'll eventually lose in the Supreme Court even if they win in the appeal court. The Supreme Court will never accept that there are two countries occupying the Constitutionally defined territory of the State. That's bullocks. If the Supreme Court accepts that argument, then there will a Constitutional crisis and open civil war. The State will be divided. Blood will be spilled.
This episode is a very good topic in Political Science subject. I wish I'm still in college because I will definitely force our PolSci professor to discuss this. I love arguments like this.
Good point. It was a last minute addition to the mechanics of the body switch. Like it was only added to solve a dilemma because the two characters are too far away from each other. 😅
When they switched, the ML-in-FL was trying to escape after capture. But when the ML returned to his body, he did not remember it.
He even asked where the FL was and they told him that she was with the former Queen. But it was him while in the FL's body who split with the former Queen.
Forgetting their memories every switch was not part of the mechanics. In fact, even if he did forget, he did not forget anything up to when he was running with the former Queen. The only part he forgot was from the time he split up with the former Queen up to while he was trying to escape, just before they switched back.
I can't find any in-universe explanation to explain it. I have no choice but to accept that there was a continuity error. 🤣🤣 They probably filmed those scenes before the filmed the running and his capture.
If you're reading this, wrong page!---Anyone noticed that S03 is more brutal and violent?
If you're reading this, wrong page!
---
- They're not doing hit-and-run, twice the same person at that. He probably died the second time because they never showed him again. - The business partner, boom, dead. - The CEO, wasn't it obvious she'll fall if they corner her at the roof top?
1 
The border system, economic system, and our "national pride" / patriotism / nationalism, are what's causing these inequality, discrimination, desperation, and poverty. It's really sad we can't get over these artificial systems our forefathers created.
In another thread somewhere, Bangladeshi. Which is also possible since these countries are neighbours and the Burmese language has a wider spread than it's current State borders. (Burmese is also spoken in some parts of Tibet for example.)
Many first-world countries often have issues where couples get married and then divorce later. The native gets paid for it.
It is actually no longer easy of couples, where one is Korean, to travel to Korea together. Korean embassies often ask ridiculous proofs to prove they're actually a couple. It doesn't matter if.they have a kid or is married because again, under the right conditions, they can divorce in Korea without the spouse getting deported, even naturalised as a Korean citizen.
The strictness is understandable because there really are bad actors abusing the system.
So, yep, it is realistic. It still is happening to this day and will always happen for as long as there is poverty and borders.
To summarize what Socialpulse said, not because you're not seeing it in news and social media does it mean it isn't happening.
To Blue_Umbrella:
It's no different from Japan. Foreigners worship Japan as if it is a utopia. Foreigners will even defend Japan if people are saying negative things about it—they'll even dismiss a native Japanese, as if they know better than the locals. They look down on their own country to protect themselves worhipping Japan.
But behind all that, there is one major issue that many Japanese are crying out for help—Japanese women's rights. The world is obliviously about it because:
1. Japan is so damn good at hiding the issue, or toning it down
2. Foreigners are worshipping Japan as the perfect country and culture. Thus they deny the negative things because it will destroy that image.
For decades, many mangaka, especially women, are limited to voicing their plea through their works because if they literally voice it, they're systematically cancelled by the patriarchy system. Yes, there have been improvements, but it still is a far cry from being a decent improvement.
Sure, South Korea is this and that. But that's only what we are seeing as foreigners. For one, not every news from S.K. is being translated into English.
I'm from the Philippines, and you'll see a lot of vloggers and bloggers—local and foreigners alike—talk about the Philippines like some paradise. That's only the surface. No one is talking about the ugly parts because you'll either get cancelled or branded as a communist.
I think it is safe to say that every country is like that. We're good at hiding the ugly truth from foreigners.
Look at Australia. Instead of calling out the pathetic incompetence of Australia's intelligence and security networks, they invented a fake news that the Philippines is an IS training ground. That is Australia's way of hiding their pathetic incompetence, use another country as a scapegoat, change narrative. The suspects are Australians and they blame another country. Epicly pathetic and incompetent.
If they pursued it instead of accepting the deal, they'll eventually lose in the Supreme Court even if they win in the appeal court. The Supreme Court will never accept that there are two countries occupying the Constitutionally defined territory of the State. That's bullocks. If the Supreme Court accepts that argument, then there will a Constitutional crisis and open civil war. The State will be divided. Blood will be spilled.
This episode is a very good topic in Political Science subject. I wish I'm still in college because I will definitely force our PolSci professor to discuss this. I love arguments like this.
Thank you for sharing! Superb! 🙇🏽
---
When they switched, the ML-in-FL was trying to escape after capture. But when the ML returned to his body, he did not remember it.
He even asked where the FL was and they told him that she was with the former Queen. But it was him while in the FL's body who split with the former Queen.
Forgetting their memories every switch was not part of the mechanics. In fact, even if he did forget, he did not forget anything up to when he was running with the former Queen. The only part he forgot was from the time he split up with the former Queen up to while he was trying to escape, just before they switched back.
I can't find any in-universe explanation to explain it. I have no choice but to accept that there was a continuity error. 🤣🤣 They probably filmed those scenes before the filmed the running and his capture.
Mystery solved by Dahlin! See: https://kisskh.at/778864-the-moon-flows-over-the-river#comment-24529364
---
S03 is like a fan-service. Every desire of audiences to kill the evil character, that's exactly what they're doing.
LOL.
And when are they going to show us the "main" plot they teased before the premiere? You know, fighting an even bigger global crime than S02?
Let's get to it! 😆😆
---
- They're not doing hit-and-run, twice the same person at that. He probably died the second time because they never showed him again.
- The business partner, boom, dead.
- The CEO, wasn't it obvious she'll fall if they corner her at the roof top?
---
Anyone noticed that S03 is more brutal and violent?