When Park Eun Bin's adult character came into the story, there were scenes wherein it was clearly a Lee Re act.
I've seen previous works of Lee Re, and the young version she did for Castway Diva was totally hers. And yet, Eun Bin displayed the same acting as Lee Re did.
Either Eun Bin studied Re's acting after she filmed her scenes. Or, she watched Re during her filming, or worked with her.
Usually, actors for young and adult versions don't care much about consistencies. Sure, the audience will understand the change of acting, two different actors, right? But in episodes 01 and 02, there was a proper transition.
Because of this, and the fact that they look alike in this show, left the impression that they are indeed one person (and one actor).
Agree with your 2nd point. There were times in ep 2 where her acting was exactly the same as Attorney Woo. Annoyed…
Yep!
I hope it just grew on her, or it was an Easter egg / fan service. I mean, like the kimbap, I think it was an Easter egg scene.
But, yeah, same reaction. I don't recall her doing those little acts before EAW. Or, maybe it was the director's idea. Hopefully, episode 2 was the last of it.
I mean, I have nothing against it. It's just… I dunno, too soon? Unless they are subtlely promoting EAW? Hehe.
He was vehemently denying to Kang Woo Hak that he (Woo Hak) was Ki Ho, regardless of how many times Woo Hak pieced things together.
Why? Because Bo Geol knew.
Also, the inspirational quote. Ki Ho's mother was the one who said it. Yet, the mother in 2022 said it to both boys exactly the same.
The mother in 2022 and Bo Geol knew something, and they're keeping quiet about it to ensure Bo Geol's real abusive father wouldn't find them.
Some would probably ask, “If Bo Geol was Ki Ho, then why is he non-chalant about the re-appearance of Seo Mok Ha?”
A good question, to which there is possibly a simple answer: they parted ways 15 years ago, and he moved on.
As Mok Ha said herself, they ran away from their abusive fathers. That was everything between them. He doesn't need to see Mok Ha, mission accomplished. And his brother Woo Hak is doing things for Mok Ha anyway.
However, once Bo Geol crosses paths with Mok Ha, it will probably trigger the past and stir up his emotions. He probably won't be able to stop himself and will start to watch out for Mok Ha from a distance (no pun intended, it's a song).
Since everyone is talking about who is KH. There's one clue I don't see everyone mentioning. In ep 1 when they're…
Yep. I think it's Bo Geol. He's vehemently denying Woo Hak was Jung Ki Ho, it appears that he knows something and is not willing to say anything about that past because his father is still somewhere.
Episode 01 was great. It showed the things that happen in real life that most people choose to ignore. The things that happen that people turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to, like those bystanders who just watched someone else's boy be bitten to death by an adult.
While this episode depicts physical child abuse, so there is evidence and all that. Don't be mistaken dear readers, there are a hundred ways of child abuse, especially from parents. Right from their HOMES where supposedly there should be love.
It saddens me deeply that the majority of comments and reactions I've read about the premiere episode failed to see this problem and instead focused on the actors and shipping and the entertainment value.
Q: Who is the Director? Theory 1: How can the Director (fictional) know so much unless she was Bang Da Mi?
Theory 2: The only other reason that's possible is they know Bang Da Mi is alive, and they are hiding her.
However, Matthew is not aware of it. That means, there is a 3rd camp: Bang Da Mi's. Bang Da MI is probably doing her own revenge, and the Director is under Bang Da Mi's salary.
Q: Who really is “K”?
They revealed that Kang Ki Tak is impersonating K. So, who really is K?
Could it be that Kang Ki Tak is the real K? By the name itself, Kang Ki Tak = K.
If Ki Tak is K, then who is the fake son? Why is he being dragged into this K business? And why is it he is acting insane as if he is K?
It doesn't look like the fake son and Ki Tak are allies.
Q: Who is Matthew Lee?
Is Matthew Lee really Lee Hwi So?
What if Matthew Lee is the real father of Bang Da Mi?
But if he is, then what is in it for him to pretend to be Lee Hwi So?
Q: Who is that person in captive?
Is that the real Lee Hwi So?
If he is not Lee Hwi So, then who is he? Why is he scribbling?
Triplets? Or they also did cloning?EDIT: Quintuplets!There are 4 addresses!1. Singapore: 1320 Depot Rd 109708,…
I'm thinking two things:
1. Ro Hee of Korea wants to show her that being a genius is not the solution, when she said that not all geniuses are happy.
And Ro Hee of Singapore appeared to be a loner even though she's in school. And when she turned around, she has that look of someone scheming, or a person with a mind left on its own that started to think of things a genius should not think (which leads to being a psychopath if not guided).
2. Ro Hee of Korea probably hates her clones, or waging a war against them. So she gave them the addresses so they, instead of her, will be used for further experiments.
The thing with "clones", the question of who is the original becomes a very important factor. There can be only 1 original, and the rest are fakes.
Ro Hee of Korea probably started to make a move to solidify her claim as the original.
But, if Ro Hee of Singapore's somewhat suspicious look is any indication, she is also probably aware she has clones and is already planning to claim that she is the original and was thrown in Singapore to hide her.
About the kidnapping thing, can't they just say that while Myung Joon was driving, a girl (Rohee) ran towards…
Unfortunately, it doesn't matter anymore because instead of bringing her to the hospital, he kept her for days; and they also ran; and he ran too.
Whatever the reasons were, at that point, it turned into a kidnapping.
And, the law in most countries doesn't give any weight to the voice of minors. In Korea, a minor is anyone under the age of 20. The law automatically assumes that a minor cannot think on their own and can be easily coerced or manipulated.
I know, it's silly and illogical, but that's the kind of world we are living in today, and yes, it sucks. Laws in the ancient times were not like what we have today; and the way they interpret it was better than how we interpret it today.
1 
Although, good point. I was wondering what was so different with the way the young and adult versions spoke. Very good catch!
When Park Eun Bin's adult character came into the story, there were scenes wherein it was clearly a Lee Re act.
I've seen previous works of Lee Re, and the young version she did for Castway Diva was totally hers. And yet, Eun Bin displayed the same acting as Lee Re did.
Either Eun Bin studied Re's acting after she filmed her scenes. Or, she watched Re during her filming, or worked with her.
Usually, actors for young and adult versions don't care much about consistencies. Sure, the audience will understand the change of acting, two different actors, right? But in episodes 01 and 02, there was a proper transition.
Because of this, and the fact that they look alike in this show, left the impression that they are indeed one person (and one actor).
I hope it just grew on her, or it was an Easter egg / fan service. I mean, like the kimbap, I think it was an Easter egg scene.
But, yeah, same reaction. I don't recall her doing those little acts before EAW. Or, maybe it was the director's idea. Hopefully, episode 2 was the last of it.
I mean, I have nothing against it. It's just… I dunno, too soon? Unless they are subtlely promoting EAW? Hehe.
It's denial or ignore it so as not to open a can of worms thing, more to himself. Especially since his father is still looking for him.
He was vehemently denying to Kang Woo Hak that he (Woo Hak) was Ki Ho, regardless of how many times Woo Hak pieced things together.
Why? Because Bo Geol knew.
Also, the inspirational quote. Ki Ho's mother was the one who said it. Yet, the mother in 2022 said it to both boys exactly the same.
The mother in 2022 and Bo Geol knew something, and they're keeping quiet about it to ensure Bo Geol's real abusive father wouldn't find them.
Some would probably ask, “If Bo Geol was Ki Ho, then why is he non-chalant about the re-appearance of Seo Mok Ha?”
A good question, to which there is possibly a simple answer: they parted ways 15 years ago, and he moved on.
As Mok Ha said herself, they ran away from their abusive fathers. That was everything between them. He doesn't need to see Mok Ha, mission accomplished. And his brother Woo Hak is doing things for Mok Ha anyway.
However, once Bo Geol crosses paths with Mok Ha, it will probably trigger the past and stir up his emotions. He probably won't be able to stop himself and will start to watch out for Mok Ha from a distance (no pun intended, it's a song).
2. I noticed Park Eun Bin is repeating some of her acting from Extraordinary Attorney Woo. I guess it grew on her.
While this episode depicts physical child abuse, so there is evidence and all that. Don't be mistaken dear readers, there are a hundred ways of child abuse, especially from parents. Right from their HOMES where supposedly there should be love.
It saddens me deeply that the majority of comments and reactions I've read about the premiere episode failed to see this problem and instead focused on the actors and shipping and the entertainment value.
Episode 01 is loaded.
Theory 1:
How can the Director (fictional) know so much unless she was Bang Da Mi?
Theory 2:
The only other reason that's possible is they know Bang Da Mi is alive, and they are hiding her.
However, Matthew is not aware of it. That means, there is a 3rd camp: Bang Da Mi's. Bang Da MI is probably doing her own revenge, and the Director is under Bang Da Mi's salary.
Q: Who really is “K”?
They revealed that Kang Ki Tak is impersonating K. So, who really is K?
Could it be that Kang Ki Tak is the real K? By the name itself, Kang Ki Tak = K.
If Ki Tak is K, then who is the fake son? Why is he being dragged into this K business? And why is it he is acting insane as if he is K?
It doesn't look like the fake son and Ki Tak are allies.
Q: Who is Matthew Lee?
Is Matthew Lee really Lee Hwi So?
What if Matthew Lee is the real father of Bang Da Mi?
But if he is, then what is in it for him to pretend to be Lee Hwi So?
Q: Who is that person in captive?
Is that the real Lee Hwi So?
If he is not Lee Hwi So, then who is he? Why is he scribbling?
1. Ro Hee of Korea wants to show her that being a genius is not the solution, when she said that not all geniuses are happy.
And Ro Hee of Singapore appeared to be a loner even though she's in school. And when she turned around, she has that look of someone scheming, or a person with a mind left on its own that started to think of things a genius should not think (which leads to being a psychopath if not guided).
2. Ro Hee of Korea probably hates her clones, or waging a war against them. So she gave them the addresses so they, instead of her, will be used for further experiments.
The thing with "clones", the question of who is the original becomes a very important factor. There can be only 1 original, and the rest are fakes.
Ro Hee of Korea probably started to make a move to solidify her claim as the original.
But, if Ro Hee of Singapore's somewhat suspicious look is any indication, she is also probably aware she has clones and is already planning to claim that she is the original and was thrown in Singapore to hide her.
Read here: https://kisskh.at/discussions/day-of-kidnapping/120735-theories-on-the-season-01-finale-reveal-of-the-kidnapping-day
If they are not natural quintuplets, that means that family has been doing cloning.
Hmm…
I think what happened.
Grandpa perfected the experiment on enhancing intelligence.
Meanwhile, the father was perfecting cloning.
I mean, those 5 are of the same age, 12. So that means, they already had the perfect DNA 12 years ago and they started cloning in 5 locations.
I hope there's a sequel.
HAve to check it again lol.
EDIT: Oh yeah. 4!
Singapore
Hong Kong
Shanghai
Macao
Whatever the reasons were, at that point, it turned into a kidnapping.
And, the law in most countries doesn't give any weight to the voice of minors. In Korea, a minor is anyone under the age of 20. The law automatically assumes that a minor cannot think on their own and can be easily coerced or manipulated.
I know, it's silly and illogical, but that's the kind of world we are living in today, and yes, it sucks. Laws in the ancient times were not like what we have today; and the way they interpret it was better than how we interpret it today.