Presidential Candidate: Shit, I want to watch in front of the window where the bomb will explode.Presidential…
I know but it kills the immersion because it's distracting.
You were deep into it and suddenly you are back in reality because of a poor decision.
"Suspension of disbelief" is only applicable in situations where there is no possible logic or valid explanation. For example, in the movie Β«WantedΒ» where bullets curve. Now that's suspension of disbelief because it will never become impossible, the physics simply can't support it. Unless of course they use an advance smart bullet. Or, say how a loom can give orders on who to assassinate next.
But in this particular case where no sane person will stand in front of the window where the bomb would explode, and a Presidential candidate whose security ran to safety first, it's totally different from suspension of disbelief. It's just simple common sense to not stand in front of the window where a bomb you know will explode.
They were doing great in getting audiences immersed, and then they wasted that effort by a very poor scene.
Could it be her husband's US contact? They seem to be very close to risk their lives sharing highly sensitive…
So, the question is, who are truly anti-war and willing to spend billions to guarantee that Valkyrie will only work in favor of the FL?
Not only that, they actually moved very fast. Probably already hired Valkyrie before the assassination. It was far too fast. Same day of the assassination, the ML got the offer to protect the FL.
Could it be the FL's husband? "If something happens to me, protect my wife at all costs. I'm paying you this much in advance. And keep my identity secret to your agents, no one must know, especially my enemies."
I really hate it when screenwriters and/or directors make characters act like a complete fool just to elicite an emotional response from their audience. It's the 21st century already, that method is obsolete. No one wants it anymore.
Tell me, is there a Presidential candidate:
1. Where their security detail stays very far from them? 2. The Presidential candidate stands right in front of where the bomb would explode? 3. Not a single security detail, or anyone, rushed back to pick up the dumb and stupid Presidential candidate standing in front of where the bomb would explode?
Who writes and/or directs such a scene using a very obsolete method? "Make-the-characters-dumb-and-stupid-so-we-have-a-very-dramatic-scene" π€¦π½π€·π½ππ½
It's 2020s already and they're still using a method from the 1970s. That's 50 years obsolete.
The potential epidemic episode was like a premonition of SARS-CoV-2.
1. Filmed in 2018. 2. Released in 2019. 3. SARS-CoV-2 started spreading in 2019. 4. Late December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 developed into COVID-19 5. March 2020 worldwide Nationwide lockdowns. (Except Korea, they only did lockdowns per area as needed.)
What I don't understand here is what's their problem if he can't feel pain?I had an appendicitis, is it illegal…
And following their silly logic, psychiatrists and psychologists have absolutely no rights whatsoever to diagnose other people if they themselves haven't lived through the diagnosis they are giving others.
Only Autistics can diagnose an Autistic, for example.
You were deep into it and suddenly you are back in reality because of a poor decision.
"Suspension of disbelief" is only applicable in situations where there is no possible logic or valid explanation. For example, in the movie Β«WantedΒ» where bullets curve. Now that's suspension of disbelief because it will never become impossible, the physics simply can't support it. Unless of course they use an advance smart bullet. Or, say how a loom can give orders on who to assassinate next.
But in this particular case where no sane person will stand in front of the window where the bomb would explode, and a Presidential candidate whose security ran to safety first, it's totally different from suspension of disbelief. It's just simple common sense to not stand in front of the window where a bomb you know will explode.
They were doing great in getting audiences immersed, and then they wasted that effort by a very poor scene.
But at least, her stylist should've made sure it isn't obvious. π
If anything, as doctors, they should defend him. He has rights not to disclose information about his health if it won't affect patients.
It's like saying a woman cannot work as a Doctor if they have Turner Syndrome.
My apologies. ππ½
Not only that, they actually moved very fast. Probably already hired Valkyrie before the assassination. It was far too fast. Same day of the assassination, the ML got the offer to protect the FL.
Could it be the FL's husband? "If something happens to me, protect my wife at all costs. I'm paying you this much in advance. And keep my identity secret to your agents, no one must know, especially my enemies."
Everyone giving them a warning about the ML and Valkyrie.
It's a classic move. If you know you were beaten in hiring a group, you spread false information about them β¦ fast.
Since Valkyrie was already hired to protect the FL, the pro-war started to expose Valkyrie and their top agen in Korea.
So, pretty much it's a given those are pro-war.
Presidential security detail in a very safe place: GET OUT OF THERE!
Presidential Candidate: *looks but ignored him* No, I must watch up-close-and-personal if he will survive.
*kaboom*
Scene: There's a nail that got stuck halfway through the window.
Presidential Candidate: *nonchalant*
ML: *nonchalant after seeing her still there*
Tell me, is there a Presidential candidate:
1. Where their security detail stays very far from them?
2. The Presidential candidate stands right in front of where the bomb would explode?
3. Not a single security detail, or anyone, rushed back to pick up the dumb and stupid Presidential candidate standing in front of where the bomb would explode?
Who writes and/or directs such a scene using a very obsolete method? "Make-the-characters-dumb-and-stupid-so-we-have-a-very-dramatic-scene" π€¦π½π€·π½ππ½
It's 2020s already and they're still using a method from the 1970s. That's 50 years obsolete.
1. Filmed in 2018.
2. Released in 2019.
3. SARS-CoV-2 started spreading in 2019.
4. Late December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 developed into COVID-19
5. March 2020 worldwide Nationwide lockdowns. (Except Korea, they only did lockdowns per area as needed.)
That's f**** discrimination. Being "normal" doesn't give you any exclusive rights whatsoever to diagnosing other people.
People and their f**** "Normal" superiority complex sh*t.
Only Autistics can diagnose an Autistic, for example.
I had an appendicitis, is it illegal for a doctor who haven't felt appendicitis to treat me and operate on me?
I have gout. Is it illegal for a doctor who haven't experienced having gout to diagnose me and give prescriptions?
What kind of silly logic do they have that it's an Earth-shattering issue for a Doctor who can't feel pain to diagnose a patient?