In a way, yes, it is a continuation.And no, it actually make a lot of sense that Part 2 is about a different main…
But if you want spoilers…
"The Witch" franchise is referring to the twins the sister scientists created.
Part 1 was about the eldest twin who is in a Korean lab. Part 2 is about the younger twin who was in a Jeju lab.
The eldest twin is more intelligent and wiser. She plans. She manipulates. She's a strategist and she's action.
The younger twin is far more powerful. She's a weapon of mass destruction. She's intelligent too but not as intelligent as her older twin. She also lacks training with her powers because they practically kept her in isolation. Not like the older twin, the Korean lab was more humane, they let the kids study in a library.
The older twin also have social skills since she grew up outside. While the younger twin is still learning the world because she's already in her late teens when she got out.
So, telling the story of the younger twin is as important as telling the story of the older twin.
They more likely plannid a trilogy, where eventually they'll team up.
None of the kids born in thosi labs weri given a name. They are weapons, not people, as far as the governments involved are concerned.
Even the FL in Part 1 didn't have a name. Her name was given by the couple and eventually ended up in the updated records of various companies hunting the perfect superhumans.
Wow u r watching this drama? How is it? I remember u from Tastefuly yours comments.
😃
This one is more on mystery, thriller, crime. Serious tone and makes the audience try to analyse the story and solve it.
If you want to give it a try, watch in batches similar to how they released it. 6 episodes first batch. 3 episodes next batch. 2 episodes for last batch.
The plot flows well with the way they released the episodes in batches.
The old "newbie" was only assumed to still be fainted.What if he faked it so he can set up the crime scene?1.…
Which part of E09? Hmm… did I miss something?
Yep, the caretaker knows far more but she's keeping her mouth shut. It could be the best way to not be dragged in, "just keep quiet, you don't know anything".
Ina, as per official explanation, is a character who was mentally scarred because of what she witnessed when she…
No. I'm explaining why things are the way it is. I dod not say nor imply that she cannot fix things.
Allow me to try again:
1. You said: "yoon ina character is still same compared to past she playing like a game ,i don't know if she is serious about the case"
The official explanation is: traumatized The fan explanation is: Autistic-coded
2. You said: "it's not she forgot completely when happened back then"
My response is: she did forget parts of her memories because of the trauma
3. You said: "she didn't even tried to get those memories back"
My response is: She has been trying to regain her memories for the past 10 years.
4. You said: "she is a profiler who can read people face and she didn't find anything unusual"
My response is: she wasn't a profiler until 5 years ago, and while she made a name for herself, she needs plenty of real-world experience. She can make mistakes and she xan miss clues.
5. Regarding "there is no way to fix things like getting her memories back even though she tries to fix it"
No. She is regaining the parts of her memories which were previously blocked by her brain. Even in real-world cases it has been observed and studied.
Did you know that there is an order to the murders? It wasn't random. It follows a pattern and for a reason.
The pattern is: the Fibonacci sequence in reverse.
1. The first puzzle piece was at the top-right corner 2. Center-right side 3. Bottom-right 4. Center-bottom 5. Bottom-left 6. Center-left side 7. Top-left 8. Center-top side 9. Center piece
Who was first target? - Someone totally outside of the conspiracy. As far as relationship and connections go, the first target was at the outer circle. - What followed was, the relationship and connections gets more and more interconnected. As an example, Ina's uncle's murder was still a bit outside, hence, it was hard to find any connections. But the apartment connection was too easy and obvious. They just need to look at the right place.
This tells us that the order of the murders were not random. It hints at their relationship and connection with the person at the center.
It also tells Ina to hone her skills. To look where it matters. To ask the hardest questions. That, "Hey Ina, I'm giving you all the clues! Find the pattern and you'll figure out the rest! It's important so you can build a case to the final target!"
Now let's look deeper at the Fibonacci sequence: 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55
If we lay it vertically in reverse: 1. 55 2. 34 3. 21 4.13 5. 8 6. 5 7. 3 8. 2 9. 1
Combine it with the puzzle pieces:
- Piece №1 top-right = 55 = reporter who sensationalized issues at the expense of the victims; father of Ina's friend - №2 center-right = 34 = Ina's uncle who were forced to close cases - №3 bottom-right = 21 = 3rd apartment owner; lady in red - №4 center-bottom = 13 = 2nd apartment owner; the chop-chop guy - №5 bottom-left = 8 = 1st apartment owner; rude CEO - №6 center-left = 5 = someone who knows deeply but did nothing (yacht guy) - №7 top-left = 3 = the buffer and potential escapegoat to protect the mastermind - №8 center-top = 2 = close collaborator; right-hand man - №9 center = 1 = prime target; top of the pyramid/hierarchy; mastermind
The Fibonacci numbers could very well state how far in relationship and connection with the prime target a person is.
So, the reporter was "55". Practically outside. But he was targeted because he's a trash reporter.
Ina's uncle is "34". Also practically outside. Just an unlucky person caught in the middle, but he still did what he was ordered to despite knowing it was wrong.
The yacht guy is "5". He knows a lot things. Even told Ina things she didn't know about her parents. But he turned a blind eye and a deaf ear. He's as guilty as everyone else, far more guilty at that.
if it is all linked to ina's parents, they were probably the first victims, murder disguised as accident so the…
It's possible, but there's a circular or fibonacci pattern to how the pieces/murders occur.
The serial killer isn't just killing his targets randomly. There's an order to it. With the way the puzzles where revealed, it's similar to a fibonacci sequence, only, he started outside of the pattern and goes inward towards the center.
The center, without a doubt, is the person at the center of it all. The wuestion is, a target to be killed or a target meticulously designed to reveal the crimes of the elite which were swept under the rug? Someone like the top person who ordered to hide things or someone like Ina, respectively?
Ina, as per official explanation, is a character who was mentally scarred because of what she witnessed when she…
I'm confused with your reply. My reply was explaining why Ina is the way she is. It was an answer to your feedback, and I quote, "yoon ina character is still same compared to past she playing like a game ,i don't know if she is serious about the case".
Anyway… she did forget and she was trying to remember the scene.
1. That was why she kept visiting her psychologist 2. It was why she kept talking to her psychologist about the past and she even complained almost every single time that she can't remember it; or why is she remembering more pieces "now" but not before 3. She even visits and stand at her uncle's crime scene to force her memories to surface, and said she's been doing it since and only "now" did the other part of her memories started surfacing
Also: - She was not a profiler when she was 19, she was a Grade 12 student preparing for her national exams. - Based on when she was assigned a psychologist that is the officially sanctioned partner of the police force, we can deduce that she joined 5 years ago. She only met those psychologists 5 years ago, and no doubt, she met them after the police force ordered her to. - Forgetting memories, or parts of it, is usually because of a traumatic experience. Seeing a dead body, of a family member at that, and as a 19-year old, can be traumatic. Her brain went into self-preservation mode and blocked parts of her memories of that night. It's not fiction, it's well-observed and studied in real life.
It’s listed on her page that she’s a guest star. Is MLD info inaccurate? Idk I just find it really weird if…
No, don't rely on MDL cast list.
1st: they have weird rules that often don't align with industry standards and practices 2nd: they refuse any updates despite the obvious facts and sources provided, it's very tiring arguing with them
The "guest" is wrong for both psychologists. Whoever submitted that and whoever in the MDL team who approved it, did not check and not watching the series at all. Obviously, the two psychologists are not guests, but any update attempts were probably being declined—which again is not surprising.
If you're suspecting one or both of the psychologists, that's good because: 1. Both actors are celebrities. No production team will pay a fortune on celebrities only to give them "extra" characters. 2. If those characters are played by celebrity actors, then those characters are not "extras" or "guests". They are integral to the story. (It doesn't mean they're the real serial killers, being a misdirection is itself integral to the plot.)
How did I Na find those psychatrists? How was it arranged? I mean Lee Seung-ju's actress, Park Gyu Young, is just…
Government agencies always have a partner psychologists, it's SOP. The company of those two psychologists are the police force's partner in their jurisdiction.
So basically, detective was covering for the male therapist who is the actual killer ig. At this point i think…
The old "newbie" was only assumed to still be fainted.
What if he faked it so he can set up the crime scene?
1. The moment the Captain left, he stood and positioned himself holding the shotgun. 2. He intentionally planned the Captain to choke him and to steal his gun. 3. He wanted his target to shoot the Captain because he's getting too close or he failed in doing his instructions (to use the Press). 4. After shooting his target, he left to hide the shotgun, and then pretended waking up rfter he fainted. 5. Perfect alibi.
I'm not saying that he is the serial killer. However, Ina is committing elementary mistakes: not suspecting everyone, even her caretaker.
1 
https://kisskh.at/profile/YourOnlyOne/review/459024
"The Witch" franchise is referring to the twins the sister scientists created.
Part 1 was about the eldest twin who is in a Korean lab.
Part 2 is about the younger twin who was in a Jeju lab.
The eldest twin is more intelligent and wiser. She plans. She manipulates. She's a strategist and she's action.
The younger twin is far more powerful. She's a weapon of mass destruction. She's intelligent too but not as intelligent as her older twin. She also lacks training with her powers because they practically kept her in isolation. Not like the older twin, the Korean lab was more humane, they let the kids study in a library.
The older twin also have social skills since she grew up outside. While the younger twin is still learning the world because she's already in her late teens when she got out.
So, telling the story of the younger twin is as important as telling the story of the older twin.
They more likely plannid a trilogy, where eventually they'll team up.
And no, it actually make a lot of sense that Part 2 is about a different main character. You'll understand if you watch Part 2 without skipping.
Even the FL in Part 1 didn't have a name. Her name was given by the couple and eventually ended up in the updated records of various companies hunting the perfect superhumans.
Hmm… The Tyrant?
This one is more on mystery, thriller, crime. Serious tone and makes the audience try to analyse the story and solve it.
If you want to give it a try, watch in batches similar to how they released it. 6 episodes first batch. 3 episodes next batch. 2 episodes for last batch.
The plot flows well with the way they released the episodes in batches.
You'll be missed on this Earth, plane, dimension, world but know that you lived a good life and gave everyone good memories.
Mabuhay! Shalom!
✨🌌
Watch S03E04 of Whenever Possible, her first appearance in a variety show.
Yep, the caretaker knows far more but she's keeping her mouth shut. It could be the best way to not be dragged in, "just keep quiet, you don't know anything".
Allow me to try again:
1. You said: "yoon ina character is still same compared to past she playing like a game ,i don't know if she is serious about the case"
The official explanation is: traumatized
The fan explanation is: Autistic-coded
2. You said: "it's not she forgot completely when happened back then"
My response is: she did forget parts of her memories because of the trauma
3. You said: "she didn't even tried to get those memories back"
My response is: She has been trying to regain her memories for the past 10 years.
4. You said: "she is a profiler who can read people face and she didn't find anything unusual"
My response is: she wasn't a profiler until 5 years ago, and while she made a name for herself, she needs plenty of real-world experience. She can make mistakes and she xan miss clues.
5. Regarding "there is no way to fix things like getting her memories back even though she tries to fix it"
No. She is regaining the parts of her memories which were previously blocked by her brain. Even in real-world cases it has been observed and studied.
---
Now, I'm curious, have you watched up to E09?
Did you know that there is an order to the murders? It wasn't random. It follows a pattern and for a reason.
The pattern is: the Fibonacci sequence in reverse.
1. The first puzzle piece was at the top-right corner
2. Center-right side
3. Bottom-right
4. Center-bottom
5. Bottom-left
6. Center-left side
7. Top-left
8. Center-top side
9. Center piece
Who was first target?
- Someone totally outside of the conspiracy. As far as relationship and connections go, the first target was at the outer circle.
- What followed was, the relationship and connections gets more and more interconnected. As an example, Ina's uncle's murder was still a bit outside, hence, it was hard to find any connections. But the apartment connection was too easy and obvious. They just need to look at the right place.
This tells us that the order of the murders were not random. It hints at their relationship and connection with the person at the center.
It also tells Ina to hone her skills. To look where it matters. To ask the hardest questions. That, "Hey Ina, I'm giving you all the clues! Find the pattern and you'll figure out the rest! It's important so you can build a case to the final target!"
Now let's look deeper at the Fibonacci sequence: 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55
If we lay it vertically in reverse:
1. 55
2. 34
3. 21
4.13
5. 8
6. 5
7. 3
8. 2
9. 1
Combine it with the puzzle pieces:
- Piece №1 top-right = 55 = reporter who sensationalized issues at the expense of the victims; father of Ina's friend
- №2 center-right = 34 = Ina's uncle who were forced to close cases
- №3 bottom-right = 21 = 3rd apartment owner; lady in red
- №4 center-bottom = 13 = 2nd apartment owner; the chop-chop guy
- №5 bottom-left = 8 = 1st apartment owner; rude CEO
- №6 center-left = 5 = someone who knows deeply but did nothing (yacht guy)
- №7 top-left = 3 = the buffer and potential escapegoat to protect the mastermind
- №8 center-top = 2 = close collaborator; right-hand man
- №9 center = 1 = prime target; top of the pyramid/hierarchy; mastermind
The Fibonacci numbers could very well state how far in relationship and connection with the prime target a person is.
So, the reporter was "55". Practically outside. But he was targeted because he's a trash reporter.
Ina's uncle is "34". Also practically outside. Just an unlucky person caught in the middle, but he still did what he was ordered to despite knowing it was wrong.
The yacht guy is "5". He knows a lot things. Even told Ina things she didn't know about her parents. But he turned a blind eye and a deaf ear. He's as guilty as everyone else, far more guilty at that.
And so on.
More here: https://kisskh.at/discussions/752975-nine-puzzle/141360-analyses-theories?pid=3326972&page=1#p3326972
The serial killer isn't just killing his targets randomly. There's an order to it. With the way the puzzles where revealed, it's similar to a fibonacci sequence, only, he started outside of the pattern and goes inward towards the center.
The center, without a doubt, is the person at the center of it all. The wuestion is, a target to be killed or a target meticulously designed to reveal the crimes of the elite which were swept under the rug? Someone like the top person who ordered to hide things or someone like Ina, respectively?
Anyway… she did forget and she was trying to remember the scene.
1. That was why she kept visiting her psychologist
2. It was why she kept talking to her psychologist about the past and she even complained almost every single time that she can't remember it; or why is she remembering more pieces "now" but not before
3. She even visits and stand at her uncle's crime scene to force her memories to surface, and said she's been doing it since and only "now" did the other part of her memories started surfacing
Also:
- She was not a profiler when she was 19, she was a Grade 12 student preparing for her national exams.
- Based on when she was assigned a psychologist that is the officially sanctioned partner of the police force, we can deduce that she joined 5 years ago. She only met those psychologists 5 years ago, and no doubt, she met them after the police force ordered her to.
- Forgetting memories, or parts of it, is usually because of a traumatic experience. Seeing a dead body, of a family member at that, and as a 19-year old, can be traumatic. Her brain went into self-preservation mode and blocked parts of her memories of that night. It's not fiction, it's well-observed and studied in real life.
🖖🏽
1st: they have weird rules that often don't align with industry standards and practices
2nd: they refuse any updates despite the obvious facts and sources provided, it's very tiring arguing with them
The "guest" is wrong for both psychologists. Whoever submitted that and whoever in the MDL team who approved it, did not check and not watching the series at all. Obviously, the two psychologists are not guests, but any update attempts were probably being declined—which again is not surprising.
If you're suspecting one or both of the psychologists, that's good because:
1. Both actors are celebrities. No production team will pay a fortune on celebrities only to give them "extra" characters.
2. If those characters are played by celebrity actors, then those characters are not "extras" or "guests". They are integral to the story. (It doesn't mean they're the real serial killers, being a misdirection is itself integral to the plot.)
What if he faked it so he can set up the crime scene?
1. The moment the Captain left, he stood and positioned himself holding the shotgun.
2. He intentionally planned the Captain to choke him and to steal his gun.
3. He wanted his target to shoot the Captain because he's getting too close or he failed in doing his instructions (to use the Press).
4. After shooting his target, he left to hide the shotgun, and then pretended waking up rfter he fainted.
5. Perfect alibi.
I'm not saying that he is the serial killer. However, Ina is committing elementary mistakes: not suspecting everyone, even her caretaker.