my biggest problem (I am almost halfway through) so far is that her character completely changed from her college…
a close second is the two very different accounts of how they separated. Normally you have the opposing versions of events and the actual truth is somewhere in the middle. But what they have shown so far leaves little to no room in the middle especially considering how they go about and tell others what happened
my biggest problem (I am almost halfway through) so far is that her character completely changed from her college days, which makes it kinda hard to watch her act a fool and not speaking up. Of course people change over the years and there were external circumstances that very much affected her. But I feel like that shift is way too harsh to be reasonable.
ML's "father" uses the fact that FL's adoptive father is in the hospital only as an excuse to not declare his paternity. I don't see him worrying for any of his children.
Back to finish what I started (I was already too far in) I believe the screenwriter had only one note for the…
Here I thought she couldn't get any worse...at least she is consistent...after stealing all his savings and other valuebles, the first thing she does after he's in a coma is stealing his house. Damn. I mean this in the worst way possible: even a concentration camp would be too kind for her
Back to finish what I started (I was already too far in) I believe the screenwriter had only one note for the aunt..."SHAMELESS" There is nothing to even remotely consider a positive trait so far (as of Ep. 40)
Also it makes no sense that she would be a trigger for those suppressed memories, because he would have been triggered…
Also...I personally HATE the martyr trope.
"I have to push you away because this is best for you even though you and I will be miserable and of course you don't know why I do this because this will hurt you as well but I have already decided to sacrifice us" Something like that just infuriates me beyond words
one plot point is really stupid. It seems like the screenwriter forgot that FL is a Psychologist. She should know…
Also it makes no sense that she would be a trigger for those suppressed memories, because he would have been triggered already. Also it is naive of her to assume that he would just cause an accident. Of course we know already there was tempering but every accident has a reason/source. Her not questioning anything makes her seem like a gullible fool
one plot point is really stupid. It seems like the screenwriter forgot that FL is a Psychologist. She should know that Trauma needs to be treated and not suppressed.
I think it's really annoying that the SFL keeps on saying "everything I worked so hard for" when in reality she just got married to an old influential dude.
Here you become a victim of your own prejudices, why should it be feminine to serve water or give out food?They…
I apologise for getting defensive. It's just I felt like being lectured and that my point of view was the result of my wrong way of thinking- like you were saying "this is a YOU problem"
FIrst of all it's perfectly fine if you don't see it the way I do. I also acknowledge that this all might be just a coincidence with the roles they were handling during the let's call it outing. My point is that whether we want it or not everything in the world is somewhat coded. Of course we do know that roles in terms of vocation can be genderless. But that doesn't mean we don't automatically associate certain acts and roles with certain types. Coming back to the coding. Manual labour is very masculin coded. Also as for this outing it is the active part of the things they want to achieve. I don't deminish the role Ing and Ai played during this. However their part is portrayed more in a supportive way. Also something like providing food is more often then not feminine coded. It's the nurturing mother's love.
Honestly if you don't see that at all that's amazing. And also I don't say that this was intentionally done by the writers. Sometimes it is just a subliminal thing that we are not even aware of. Just as you said that this is my prejudice.
1 
I believe the screenwriter had only one note for the aunt..."SHAMELESS" There is nothing to even remotely consider a positive trait so far (as of Ep. 40)
"I have to push you away because this is best for you even though you and I will be miserable and of course you don't know why I do this because this will hurt you as well but I have already decided to sacrifice us"
Something like that just infuriates me beyond words
FIrst of all it's perfectly fine if you don't see it the way I do. I also acknowledge that this all might be just a coincidence with the roles they were handling during the let's call it outing. My point is that whether we want it or not everything in the world is somewhat coded. Of course we do know that roles in terms of vocation can be genderless. But that doesn't mean we don't automatically associate certain acts and roles with certain types. Coming back to the coding. Manual labour is very masculin coded. Also as for this outing it is the active part of the things they want to achieve. I don't deminish the role Ing and Ai played during this. However their part is portrayed more in a supportive way. Also something like providing food is more often then not feminine coded. It's the nurturing mother's love.
Honestly if you don't see that at all that's amazing. And also I don't say that this was intentionally done by the writers. Sometimes it is just a subliminal thing that we are not even aware of. Just as you said that this is my prejudice.