This drama is not that bad,it is just that FML's character is toxic and dumb as fk ,ML,SML & SFML are really nice...
Now she's toxic..y'all be saying anything 😠mind you all the characters in this drama are flawed...calling the female lead toxic because of her actions that were gladly assisted by the second female lead ( her friend ) and Iam not even complaining I love the loyalty....what Iam trying to say is that why is the female lead suddenly a villain just because y'all think she did a couple of things more flawed than the rest of the characters..all the characters of this drama have imperfections and have made decisions or even had misconceptions about eachother that were not right..no one is a saint and neither is the world black and white...there is a grey line and female lead and all the other characters fall into the line...you either embrace that or not that's your choice..I mean how don't we get this when it's exactly what the drama is trying to show..NO ONE IS PERFECT
mind you female lead can be naive and ignorant but you don't pull off such a lie when you dumb she had help yes but most of the quirky wierd quick witted ideas came from her and Iam not even trying to praise her because what she did was wrong..Iam just trying to put a point across... HAPPY WOMEN'S DAY
Do you know why the rainbow is beautiful? It is beautiful because it has different colors. If it were just pure white, red, or yellow, it wouldn't be as stunning. Women who wear heels, gowns, and pearl necklaces are beautiful, but women in cold labs who typically wear shirts, trousers, and flat shoes are also beautiful. Just like the rainbow, the world can contain and present all kinds of colors. That's why even the most ordinary person like me finds it interesting to live in. - SCC
Some women stand out for their beauty, some shine because of their kindness, some are remarkable due to their bravery, and some dazzle with their wisdom. They are beautiful in their own unique ways. So why do you limit the definition of beauty to just appearance and think that a woman can only be confident when she looks pretty? - Su Miao
I find dramas leaning towards more comedic element often have lower ratings in general, and I don’t even know…
right like never give up the Chinese drama..like come on who doesn't like sitcoms Ofcourse no one was laughing in the back ground but that was the most stress relieving series I've watched and it was so funny but rated below an 8
Tang qi finding out that all the people he fell for were one person so he can now finally clear himself free of the " Jerk who falls easily in love with every one allegations" ðŸ˜ðŸ˜‚
Making Su Chengcheng a terrible person after today's episodes should feel outdated.Tang Qi has listened to her…
I spent my energy defending her and making people try to understand her yesterday so for today Iam just skipping the negativity and focussing on the fact that we getting sweetness tomorrow ðŸ¤
SCC's confidence was crushed so bad regardless of how she shows that she's okay she still doesn't love her self enough to be sure that she can be loved by some one..and it's a pity it seems like she's getting comfortable with that at this point...
Okay why are Netflix originals so good this year Iam not complaining really Iam eating them all up...first trauma code Heroes on call then Melo movie and Iam only two episodes in on this but Iam already seeing good reviews....
I like how realistic YF character is. But I dislike SY's character. Tooo unrealistic imo. Noone waits for someone…
Sang Yan isn't all too unrealistic he grew up with love so he knows how to give it whole heartedly at that such people exist...Yifan leaving can be seen in a two way basis firstly you can understand why she left and secondly call her out for leaving with no explanation....but at the same time also understand why she didn't explain.. things and rather went with that impulsive decision of what she thought was right at the moment.
idk how I managed to finish ep 25.. I've been crying since the first 5 minutes of ep 24 .. she really went through…
That last part is so beautifully written...like I understand you can't easily evaluate or imagine the pain of another but Iam more than sure you can try to empathize or related to this..with that you definitely won't have a problem understanding their actions...
Here is a text version of the link below..Iam sorry if it's long..so only read if interested!
ARE SOME OF US NOT READY FOR COMPLEX FLAWED CHARACTERS?
Viewers often express a desire for flawed, imperfect, and relatable characters that they can truly connect with, hoping to understand their actions by putting themselves in their shoes. However, when faced with these very characters, many struggle to accept their imperfections and the decisions they make that don’t align with their own moral compass. This contradiction highlights a significant issue: while audiences crave authenticity and human-like complexity, they frequently judge these characters against their own standards of right and wrong, overlooking the essence of what makes them relatable.
It seems that we have become accustomed to flawless characters, leading to difficulty in accepting a narrative where a character exhibits human responses to challenging situations. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the recent female leads of various ongoing dramas, where audiences react negatively to their imperfections. It’s essential to recognize that trying to understand a character doesn’t equate to justifying their actions; rather, it involves viewing situations from their perspective to analyze the broader context of their choices.
Growth is inherently tied to mistakes, regrets, and the journey toward redemption. If we expect characters to reflect the complexities of human experience, we must allow them the space to act authentically, embodying the flawed nature we all possess. Embracing this duality in character development can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the audience, fostering an environment where growth and understanding can flourish.
I personally enjoy delving into a character and attempting to understand them based on how they are presented. I find that their experiences and backstories play a significant role in shaping their decision-making processes. I often think about what led them to their current situation and how I might handle similar circumstances if I were in their position. Even when I struggle to fully grasp their choices because I haven’t faced the same challenges, I still make an effort to empathize. While it’s true that you can never entirely imagine what someone else is going through, the attempt is what matters.
This approach might just be my perspective, but it seems to be a common sentiment. We all have different tastes and opinions, and while criticism is part of engaging with flawed characters, it should ideally be rooted in an understanding of their experiences. If we ask for complex, flawed characters, we should also be prepared to analyze their actions from their point of view. I've noticed this disconnect in shows like "Filter," "The Best Thing," and "First Frost." It appears that many viewers are not quite ready for characters that embody the complexities of human emotions, including clouded judgment and contradictions. Embracing these elements can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the characters we watch.
Being main characters in a show doesn’t negate the possibility of them being written as imperfect and flawed. In fact, I truly appreciate when a character is complex enough to spark debate among viewers—some criticize their actions while others strive to understand their motivations. This dynamic creates a richer viewing experience, allowing us to engage with the characters on a deeper level. It’s through their imperfections that we can explore the nuances of human behavior and the various perspectives that come into play. When characters are multi-dimensional, it not only enhances the storytelling but also invites us to reflect on our own judgments and experiences.ANYWAYS PERSONAL OPINION!!! ( Iam afraid it will seem like Iam talking for all if I don't include this..)
https://www.reddit.com/r/CDrama/s/2mqZC7jB9w I actually wanted to write this here because I've noticed the same pattern of reactions in almost all the ongoing three dramas that is filter the best thing and now first frost.
1 
3 
mind you female lead can be naive and ignorant but you don't pull off such a lie when you dumb she had help yes but most of the quirky wierd quick witted ideas came from her and Iam not even trying to praise her because what she did was wrong..Iam just trying to put a point across... HAPPY WOMEN'S DAY
Some women stand out for their beauty, some shine because of their kindness, some are remarkable due to their bravery, and some dazzle with their wisdom. They are beautiful in their own unique ways. So why do you limit the definition of beauty to just appearance and think that a woman can only be confident when she looks pretty? - Su Miao
HAPPY WOMEN'S DAY💜
ARE SOME OF US NOT READY FOR COMPLEX FLAWED CHARACTERS?
Viewers often express a desire for flawed, imperfect, and relatable characters that they can truly connect with, hoping to understand their actions by putting themselves in their shoes. However, when faced with these very characters, many struggle to accept their imperfections and the decisions they make that don’t align with their own moral compass. This contradiction highlights a significant issue: while audiences crave authenticity and human-like complexity, they frequently judge these characters against their own standards of right and wrong, overlooking the essence of what makes them relatable.
It seems that we have become accustomed to flawless characters, leading to difficulty in accepting a narrative where a character exhibits human responses to challenging situations. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the recent female leads of various ongoing dramas, where audiences react negatively to their imperfections. It’s essential to recognize that trying to understand a character doesn’t equate to justifying their actions; rather, it involves viewing situations from their perspective to analyze the broader context of their choices.
Growth is inherently tied to mistakes, regrets, and the journey toward redemption. If we expect characters to reflect the complexities of human experience, we must allow them the space to act authentically, embodying the flawed nature we all possess. Embracing this duality in character development can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the audience, fostering an environment where growth and understanding can flourish.
I personally enjoy delving into a character and attempting to understand them based on how they are presented. I find that their experiences and backstories play a significant role in shaping their decision-making processes. I often think about what led them to their current situation and how I might handle similar circumstances if I were in their position. Even when I struggle to fully grasp their choices because I haven’t faced the same challenges, I still make an effort to empathize. While it’s true that you can never entirely imagine what someone else is going through, the attempt is what matters.
This approach might just be my perspective, but it seems to be a common sentiment. We all have different tastes and opinions, and while criticism is part of engaging with flawed characters, it should ideally be rooted in an understanding of their experiences. If we ask for complex, flawed characters, we should also be prepared to analyze their actions from their point of view. I've noticed this disconnect in shows like "Filter," "The Best Thing," and "First Frost." It appears that many viewers are not quite ready for characters that embody the complexities of human emotions, including clouded judgment and contradictions. Embracing these elements can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the characters we watch.
Being main characters in a show doesn’t negate the possibility of them being written as imperfect and flawed. In fact, I truly appreciate when a character is complex enough to spark debate among viewers—some criticize their actions while others strive to understand their motivations. This dynamic creates a richer viewing experience, allowing us to engage with the characters on a deeper level. It’s through their imperfections that we can explore the nuances of human behavior and the various perspectives that come into play. When characters are multi-dimensional, it not only enhances the storytelling but also invites us to reflect on our own judgments and experiences.ANYWAYS PERSONAL OPINION!!! ( Iam afraid it will seem like Iam talking for all if I don't include this..)