SCC's confidence was crushed so bad regardless of how she shows that she's okay she still doesn't love her self enough to be sure that she can be loved by some one..and it's a pity it seems like she's getting comfortable with that at this point...
people wondering how anything was going to get solved soon including the revelation the dating and so on but I trusted the writer on this one..all it took was one episode to clear the air about the revelation without making it feel rushed..and now we left with 9 episodes for the rest to be wrapped up and Iam saying that with sorrow because damn Iam gonna miss this drama THIS DRAMA AHHH😩
Okay why are Netflix originals so good this year Iam not complaining really Iam eating them all up...first trauma code Heroes on call then Melo movie and Iam only two episodes in on this but Iam already seeing good reviews....
I like how realistic YF character is. But I dislike SY's character. Tooo unrealistic imo. Noone waits for someone…
Sang Yan isn't all too unrealistic he grew up with love so he knows how to give it whole heartedly at that such people exist...Yifan leaving can be seen in a two way basis firstly you can understand why she left and secondly call her out for leaving with no explanation....but at the same time also understand why she didn't explain.. things and rather went with that impulsive decision of what she thought was right at the moment.
idk how I managed to finish ep 25.. I've been crying since the first 5 minutes of ep 24 .. she really went through…
That last part is so beautifully written...like I understand you can't easily evaluate or imagine the pain of another but Iam more than sure you can try to empathize or related to this..with that you definitely won't have a problem understanding their actions...
Here is a text version of the link below..Iam sorry if it's long..so only read if interested!
ARE SOME OF US NOT READY FOR COMPLEX FLAWED CHARACTERS?
Viewers often express a desire for flawed, imperfect, and relatable characters that they can truly connect with, hoping to understand their actions by putting themselves in their shoes. However, when faced with these very characters, many struggle to accept their imperfections and the decisions they make that don’t align with their own moral compass. This contradiction highlights a significant issue: while audiences crave authenticity and human-like complexity, they frequently judge these characters against their own standards of right and wrong, overlooking the essence of what makes them relatable.
It seems that we have become accustomed to flawless characters, leading to difficulty in accepting a narrative where a character exhibits human responses to challenging situations. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the recent female leads of various ongoing dramas, where audiences react negatively to their imperfections. It’s essential to recognize that trying to understand a character doesn’t equate to justifying their actions; rather, it involves viewing situations from their perspective to analyze the broader context of their choices.
Growth is inherently tied to mistakes, regrets, and the journey toward redemption. If we expect characters to reflect the complexities of human experience, we must allow them the space to act authentically, embodying the flawed nature we all possess. Embracing this duality in character development can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the audience, fostering an environment where growth and understanding can flourish.
I personally enjoy delving into a character and attempting to understand them based on how they are presented. I find that their experiences and backstories play a significant role in shaping their decision-making processes. I often think about what led them to their current situation and how I might handle similar circumstances if I were in their position. Even when I struggle to fully grasp their choices because I haven’t faced the same challenges, I still make an effort to empathize. While it’s true that you can never entirely imagine what someone else is going through, the attempt is what matters.
This approach might just be my perspective, but it seems to be a common sentiment. We all have different tastes and opinions, and while criticism is part of engaging with flawed characters, it should ideally be rooted in an understanding of their experiences. If we ask for complex, flawed characters, we should also be prepared to analyze their actions from their point of view. I've noticed this disconnect in shows like "Filter," "The Best Thing," and "First Frost." It appears that many viewers are not quite ready for characters that embody the complexities of human emotions, including clouded judgment and contradictions. Embracing these elements can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the characters we watch.
Being main characters in a show doesn’t negate the possibility of them being written as imperfect and flawed. In fact, I truly appreciate when a character is complex enough to spark debate among viewers—some criticize their actions while others strive to understand their motivations. This dynamic creates a richer viewing experience, allowing us to engage with the characters on a deeper level. It’s through their imperfections that we can explore the nuances of human behavior and the various perspectives that come into play. When characters are multi-dimensional, it not only enhances the storytelling but also invites us to reflect on our own judgments and experiences.ANYWAYS PERSONAL OPINION!!! ( Iam afraid it will seem like Iam talking for all if I don't include this..)
https://www.reddit.com/r/CDrama/s/2mqZC7jB9w I actually wanted to write this here because I've noticed the same pattern of reactions in almost all the ongoing three dramas that is filter the best thing and now first frost.
People often claim they want complex characters, but when faced with them, they struggle to accept the flaws and…
That it They always claim they want relatable human characters with flaws and have room for growth and development but when they given those similar characters they use their own views of morality and what's wrong and right to define how they should have handled the situation knowing damn well that they are just being human and every one chooses to cope in a way they see fit...MDL fans some MDL fans aren't ready for flawed characters because they just aren't ready to understand them even though they claim they would...
Tang qi has always been a loser in love what he wants now is an explanation in order for his mental health to…
I read comments below and I was like do these people even know Tang qi or the flow of the drama or did they just pop up after watching some tiktok edits and mistakened this for a dark revenge drama😭
Lol! 😹 Here goes everyone's expectations of revenge n redemption in gutter 🤣. Jealous loser in love tang…
Tang qi has always been a loser in love what he wants now is an explanation in order for his mental health to get back on track but people were projecting him shooting her in the head, slitting her neck and burying her alive..well I guess🤣😂
I am in jail with Su Chengcheng now 🤭It is always fascinating for me how some viewers can judge a character…
No because I like to judge these characters as they are given to me without inflicting my view of morality to them..and to me SCC is a girl that has messed up so bad she probably doesn't know how to get her self out of the situation either she's made bad decisions just to keep this secret..I see a mess of a girl not a psycho villain like most are painting her I just literally read a comment that wished that TQ slit her throat like you kidding me..give one of those people a filter and see if they will do as they are suggesting...with that I'll argue in court and make sure SCC pays for the mental health damage and the lies maybe the murder of her personas and nothing more than that 🤭
yah because him consistently following su Miao even after her evident lack of interest and rejection is some how…
SCC is to blame for the lies that went on for so long but she isn't to be blamed for Tang qi seemingly falling for Su Miao and continuously following her..I actually more than anything agreed with her decision to just kill her off because he wasn't going to let go any time soon...Su Cheng Cheng is to blame for letting the lies grow bigger but for other things y'all just need to put yourself in her shoes to realise that she had no choice and as much as that doesn't justify anything it tries
Oho poor Tang Qi! ☹️ Don't forgive SCC easily u stupidest fool then😤, make her grovel n redeem herself,…
yah because him consistently following su Miao even after her evident lack of interest and rejection is some how Su Cheng Cheng's fault as well * Scoffs *
Tbh at this point, there is no point is engaging with the same users who keep on saying the same things about…
and to think that we all watching the same things when some people are just deliberately living things out to make their narrative more solid anyways to each on their own we all view things differently....and Iam personally all in for the journey..nothing about this drama is worthy of my complaint do far and I hope it stays that way till the end I've got everything I need complex interesting characters, plot consistency, depth and humour, dark and light comedy, smart writing, development and more so you right
1 
3 
ARE SOME OF US NOT READY FOR COMPLEX FLAWED CHARACTERS?
Viewers often express a desire for flawed, imperfect, and relatable characters that they can truly connect with, hoping to understand their actions by putting themselves in their shoes. However, when faced with these very characters, many struggle to accept their imperfections and the decisions they make that don’t align with their own moral compass. This contradiction highlights a significant issue: while audiences crave authenticity and human-like complexity, they frequently judge these characters against their own standards of right and wrong, overlooking the essence of what makes them relatable.
It seems that we have become accustomed to flawless characters, leading to difficulty in accepting a narrative where a character exhibits human responses to challenging situations. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the recent female leads of various ongoing dramas, where audiences react negatively to their imperfections. It’s essential to recognize that trying to understand a character doesn’t equate to justifying their actions; rather, it involves viewing situations from their perspective to analyze the broader context of their choices.
Growth is inherently tied to mistakes, regrets, and the journey toward redemption. If we expect characters to reflect the complexities of human experience, we must allow them the space to act authentically, embodying the flawed nature we all possess. Embracing this duality in character development can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the audience, fostering an environment where growth and understanding can flourish.
I personally enjoy delving into a character and attempting to understand them based on how they are presented. I find that their experiences and backstories play a significant role in shaping their decision-making processes. I often think about what led them to their current situation and how I might handle similar circumstances if I were in their position. Even when I struggle to fully grasp their choices because I haven’t faced the same challenges, I still make an effort to empathize. While it’s true that you can never entirely imagine what someone else is going through, the attempt is what matters.
This approach might just be my perspective, but it seems to be a common sentiment. We all have different tastes and opinions, and while criticism is part of engaging with flawed characters, it should ideally be rooted in an understanding of their experiences. If we ask for complex, flawed characters, we should also be prepared to analyze their actions from their point of view. I've noticed this disconnect in shows like "Filter," "The Best Thing," and "First Frost." It appears that many viewers are not quite ready for characters that embody the complexities of human emotions, including clouded judgment and contradictions. Embracing these elements can lead to richer storytelling and deeper connections with the characters we watch.
Being main characters in a show doesn’t negate the possibility of them being written as imperfect and flawed. In fact, I truly appreciate when a character is complex enough to spark debate among viewers—some criticize their actions while others strive to understand their motivations. This dynamic creates a richer viewing experience, allowing us to engage with the characters on a deeper level. It’s through their imperfections that we can explore the nuances of human behavior and the various perspectives that come into play. When characters are multi-dimensional, it not only enhances the storytelling but also invites us to reflect on our own judgments and experiences.ANYWAYS PERSONAL OPINION!!! ( Iam afraid it will seem like Iam talking for all if I don't include this..)