Never watched C-Drama before. Would you recommend Pursuit of Jade as the first C-Drama?
Personally, no, I would not. Starting your c-drama journey with Pursuit of Jade would be setting the bar too high in my opinion. If the setting of Pursuit of Jade pleases you, I would watch Legend of the Female General or Princess Agents first. Or maybe, something with a modern setting, like Time and Him Are Just Right.
The Romance of Tiger and Rose is another good recommendation to start.
YOU NEED TO ASAP! the best slowburn modern cdrama to date.
Of course theyāre different genres, comparison doesnāt require them to be identical. Iām talking about the quality of writing, character depth, and narrative cohesion, not whether a drama is set in modern or historical times. Good pacing and well-developed characters arenāt genre-specific. Moreover, MDL ratings arenāt divided by genre, so itās hard not to find it unfair when better-executed shows end up with ratings similar to far more mediocre dramas like Shine On Me. This is factual criticism, not hate.
YOU NEED TO ASAP! the best slowburn modern cdrama to date.
The fact that the general public enjoyed it doesnāt make it any less overrated. For comparison, Prisoner of Beauty holds an 8.9 rating, and it is endlessly superior in terms of plot, costumes, OST, character development, depth, and overall execution. Just to be clear, Iām not hating on this drama at all. But calling it āthe best slow-burn modern C-drama to dateā is, to say the least, a stretch.
YOU NEED TO ASAP! the best slowburn modern cdrama to date.
I disagree! You're My Glory was a way better slow-burn than this. This rating is overly generous. In my opinion, this drama is a 7.0 at most. :/ But, oh well.
Thank you very much for this! Itās very difficult to maintain our composure indeed, but I think itās important for us all to always try to engage in discussions like this, while remaining respectful at all times. I have noticed that it always seems left wingers are gaining more ground, especially in the new generations. The reason for that is also because we (conservatives) have a tendency to try to avoid confrontation⦠Because our ideals are contrary to what is considered mainstream now, which is very disheartening. But that can change if we try! Each step is precious and every new discussion is valid as long as thereās logic and respect involved. God bless you! Here in Brazil things are getting out of hand, we are currently under a judicial dictatorship, we are being silenced and censored, thereās no one to turn to. I hope youāll pray for us!
I agree with most of your statements, but the case is still not closed, we don't know if the scandal is really…
I have no bias. I donāt even follow this actress. My opinions where made based on what has been published in the media so far. I am giving my opinion while believing the ones who reported and published it have done their work and have checked the facts. I wish you well! God bless you
Iām not sure I completely understood what you were trying to say here, so Iāll return to my main point which is accountability. If itās revealed that a celebrity or anyone else with influence has committed a grave offense, they should be held responsible and suffer the consequences of their wrongs. I believe this should be a must all over the world, but I understand that in some places, it goes unpunished. But, returning to the case being originally discussed here, in Korea specifically such acts are taken seriously and as you know, people lose their careers. As they should, again, in my opinion.
I agree with most of your statements, but the case is still not closed, we don't know if the scandal is really…
I am certainly entitled to the right of forming my opinion and voicing it. If youāre unhappy, please walk away peacefully. Donāt try to stop me from saying what I think.
Well, thatās where our opinions differ. I believe they do. Spider Manās cliche quote is true, āWith great power comes great responsibilityā. And this is true not only to celebrities, but to any individual whose profession enables their actions great visibility to the general public, such as politicians and public servants in general (who are the face of the Government), even more so the people that work directly with the law. Imagine a public prosecutor committing a crime or a police officer. Their responsibility to keep up setting good examples is a must in my opinion and the reason why is so more shocking and widely spread when it turns out theyāve committed an ofense. As I said, being a celebrity comes with onus and bonus. The bonus is makings lots of money, being famous, having certain privileges, being loved and admired by many. The onus is having to walk a certain moral line that if they stray too far, theyāll face consequences great enough to lose their profession, since their job is directly affected by their popularity and the way the public views their work and persona.
Those people are sick. Letās refrain from using extreme examples because that doesnāt really count. What says what is morally correct or not is simple: common sense.
Btw, my comment above yours what not directed at you, but at the other person I was previously conversing with. I just wanted to make this clear since youāve been polite and ready to have a clean discussion using normal reasonsing, which is something I welcome very much.
You are right, unless someone can read minds, itās impossible to know for sure who is genuinely good or not. But still, I think that every job has an onus and a bonus. Celebrities become celebrities knowing beforehand about the pressure theyāre going to have to endure⦠So I donāt think thatās a very good point to be made. I am not saying they must become Jesus, but that they have a certain duty that comes with their profession choice to always try to set good examples for society.
The Romance of Tiger and Rose is another good recommendation to start.