Replying to latteholic • Sep 13, 2020
Title Alice
But fluid can branch and still flow in that different branches, no? So I don't understand why the statement that…
using the kidnapping mother as example, her time was flowing prior to her trip. she went back, did what she did the last time, changed the past and created parallel worlds. When she returned to the future, she returned to her future which based on the show's construct means that there is a timeline existing where the life the future mother lived still exists but the paradigm is that she can no longer access this timeline. Why can't she access this timeline? Given that she branched time the daughter now has at least 2 new constructs where she either lives or still dies even with the change. These new constructs are accessible to future mother but her original timeline is not. How can time be fluid in this instance? If you use Alice to make changes in the past, a door closes cutting off the pre existing timeline that according to the show still exists because you can return to it in the future but you cannot access it between the point of branching to the point of travel (back in time). This introduces a whole new theory. So yeah that's why time fluidity contradicts parallel worlds theorem in this show.